Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

EasyInstruct: An Easy-to-use Instruction Processing Framework for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.03049 v4 pith:YS7XIGSZ submitted 2024-02-05 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HCcs.IRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCcs.IRcs.LG
keywords instructionprocessingdataeasyinstructframeworkdemoeasy-to-uselanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, instruction tuning has gained increasing attention and emerged as a crucial technique to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). To construct high-quality instruction datasets, many instruction processing approaches have been proposed, aiming to achieve a delicate balance between data quantity and data quality. Nevertheless, due to inconsistencies that persist among various instruction processing methods, there is no standard open-source instruction processing implementation framework available for the community, which hinders practitioners from further developing and advancing. To facilitate instruction processing research and development, we present EasyInstruct, an easy-to-use instruction processing framework for LLMs, which modularizes instruction generation, selection, and prompting, while also considering their combination and interaction. EasyInstruct is publicly released and actively maintained at https://github.com/zjunlp/EasyInstruct, along with an online demo app and a demo video for quick-start, calling for broader research centered on instruction data and synthetic data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can AI Extract Antecedent Factors of Human Trust in AI? An Application of Information Extraction for Scientific Literature in Behavioural and Computer Sciences

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces the first English annotated corpus for extracting factors that influence human trust in AI from scientific text, and shows supervised NER and RE models outperform prompt-based LLMs.

Pith tools