Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Model Stealing Attack against Recommender System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.11571 v2 pith:YTV6UECP submitted 2023-12-18 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modeldatatargetattacksrecommenderstealingsystemsattack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the vulnerability of recommender systems to data privacy attacks. However, research on the threat to model privacy in recommender systems, such as model stealing attacks, is still in its infancy. Some adversarial attacks have achieved model stealing attacks against recommender systems, to some extent, by collecting abundant training data of the target model (target data) or making a mass of queries. In this paper, we constrain the volume of available target data and queries and utilize auxiliary data, which shares the item set with the target data, to promote model stealing attacks. Although the target model treats target and auxiliary data differently, their similar behavior patterns allow them to be fused using an attention mechanism to assist attacks. Besides, we design stealing functions to effectively extract the recommendation list obtained by querying the target model. Experimental results show that the proposed methods are applicable to most recommender systems and various scenarios and exhibit excellent attack performance on multiple datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Context Attribution Handles What the Model Already Knows

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Context attribution methods cannot disentangle in-context from in-weight knowledge and assign unfaithful scores under overlap; new metrics and WMDP-Cyber++ quantify the failure.

  2. LLM4MEA: Data-free Model Extraction Attacks on Sequential Recommenders via Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-driven agent generates synthetic interaction sequences that, when queried against a target sequential recommender, produce surrogate models with higher agreement to the target than random or autoregressive data...

Pith tools