REVIEW 5 cited by
ProjectEval: A Benchmark for Programming Agents Automated Evaluation on Project-Level Code Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ProjectEval: A Benchmark for Programming Agents Automated Evaluation on Project-Level Code Generation
read the original abstract
Recently, LLM agents have made rapid progress in improving their programming capabilities. However, existing benchmarks lack the ability to automatically evaluate from users' perspective, and also lack the explainability of the results of LLM agents' code generation capabilities. Thus, we introduce ProjectEval, a new benchmark for LLM agents project-level code generation's automated evaluation by simulating user interaction. ProjectEval is constructed by LLM with human reviewing. It has three different level inputs of natural languages or code skeletons. ProjectEval can evaluate the generated projects by user interaction simulation for execution, and by code similarity through existing objective indicators. Through ProjectEval, we find that systematic engineering project code, overall understanding of the project and comprehensive analysis capability are the keys for LLM agents to achieve practical projects. Our findings and benchmark provide valuable insights for developing more effective programming agents that can be deployed in future real-world production.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
RigorBench: Benchmarking Engineering Process Discipline in Autonomous AI Coding Agents
RigorBench is the first benchmark for process discipline in autonomous AI coding agents, reporting 41% higher process quality scores and 17% higher outcome correctness when agents follow structured engineering practices.
-
RigorBench: Benchmarking Engineering Process Discipline in Autonomous AI Coding Agents
RigorBench evaluates AI coding agents on process discipline via five pillars and reports 41% higher process scores and 17% better outcome correctness with structured approaches on 30 tasks.
-
ClassEval-Pro: A Cross-Domain Benchmark for Class-Level Code Generation
ClassEval-Pro benchmark shows frontier LLMs achieve at most 45.6% Pass@1 on class-level code tasks, with logic errors (56%) and dependency errors (38%) as dominant failure modes.
-
From Execution to Education: A Bloom-Aligned Framework for Measuring Educational Control in LLMs
On 2,520 programming tasks, matched Qwen general and coder models reliably raise Bloom cognitive demand but fail to lower it, so execution skill does not imply educational control.
-
From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review
A survey consolidating benchmarks, agent frameworks, real-world applications, and protocols for LLM-based autonomous agents into a proposed taxonomy with recommendations for future research.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.