Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Coarse-Tuning Models of Code with Reinforcement Learning Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.18341 v2 pith:YVFSOUNM submitted 2023-05-25 cs.PL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.PLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords codefeedbackllmsmodelsrlcffunctiongroundinglearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained on code have recently emerged as the dominant approach to program synthesis. However, these models are trained using next-token prediction, which ignores the syntax and semantics of code. We propose RLCF, that further trains a pre-trained LLM via reinforcement learning, using feedback from a grounding function that scores the quality of the code. The grounding function uses (i) compiler-derived feedback on whether the code it generates passes a set of correctness checks; and (ii) feedback from a different LLM that compares the generated code to a reference code. RLCF is model- and language-agnostic. We empirically evaluate it on the MBJP and MathQA tasks for Java. Our experiments show that RLCF raises the odds that an LLM-generated program compiles, is executable, and produces the right output on tests, often allowing LLMs to match the performance of 2x-8x larger LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tests as Prompt: A Test-Driven-Development Benchmark for LLM Code Generation

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper builds a 1000-task test-driven development benchmark for LLMs and concludes that instruction following and in-context learning matter more than general coding proficiency.

  2. Cyber Shadows: Neutralizing Security Threats with AI and Targeted Policy Measures

    cs.CR 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    No new empirical result; the paper reviews known AI security risks and argues that AI-driven defenses plus targeted regulation are both necessary.

Pith tools