Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Detecting Harmful Content On Online Platforms: What Platforms Need Vs. Where Research Efforts Go

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.00153 v2 pith:YWTP6G6A submitted 2021-02-27 cs.CL cs.SI

Detecting Harmful Content On Online Platforms: What Platforms Need Vs. Where Research Efforts Go

classification cs.CL cs.SI
keywords contentplatformsharmfulonlinewhatautomaticallydetectingdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The proliferation of harmful content on online platforms is a major societal problem, which comes in many different forms including hate speech, offensive language, bullying and harassment, misinformation, spam, violence, graphic content, sexual abuse, self harm, and many other. Online platforms seek to moderate such content to limit societal harm, to comply with legislation, and to create a more inclusive environment for their users. Researchers have developed different methods for automatically detecting harmful content, often focusing on specific sub-problems or on narrow communities, as what is considered harmful often depends on the platform and on the context. We argue that there is currently a dichotomy between what types of harmful content online platforms seek to curb, and what research efforts there are to automatically detect such content. We thus survey existing methods as well as content moderation policies by online platforms in this light and we suggest directions for future work.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Toxic Memes: A Survey of Computational Perspectives on the Detection and Explanation of Meme Toxicities

    cs.CL 2024-06 accept novelty 6.0

    A PRISMA-based survey of 158 computational works on toxic meme detection introduces a new toxicity taxonomy and a framework linking target, intent, and conveyance tactics while noting trends in LLMs and cross-modal methods.