REVIEW 5 cited by
A Primer on PAC-Bayesian Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Generalised Bayesian learning algorithms are increasingly popular in machine learning, due to their PAC generalisation properties and flexibility. The present paper aims at providing a self-contained survey on the resulting PAC-Bayes framework and some of its main theoretical and algorithmic developments.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Selective Safety Steering via Value-Filtered Decoding
Value-filtered decoding steers LLM outputs for safety at decoding time using a value criterion with an explicit bound on false interventions controlled by one threshold hyperparameter.
-
Tighter Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds via a Novel Class of Change of Measure Inequalities
A unified DPI-based framework yields novel change-of-measure inequalities that produce tighter high-probability generalization bounds.
-
PAC-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Trains Generalizable Policies
A mixing-time-aware PAC-Bayes bound is turned into PB-SAC, an algorithm that computes tightening certified performance lower bounds during SAC training on MuJoCo tasks.
-
A Generalized-Bayes Perspective on Counterfactual Explanations: Posterior-Based Decision-Making and Evaluation
Counterfactual explanation by distance minimization is re-derived as MAP inference in a generalized Bayes posterior, and additional posterior-based decision rules are proposed and evaluated.
-
Position: There Is No Free Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification
Bayesian updating is reframed as an optimization problem without inherent uncertainty quantification, and a PAC-style calibration step is proposed to give predictive intervals frequentist coverage.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.