REVIEW 2 cited by
Challenges to the Good-Walker paradigm in coherent and incoherent photoproduction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Challenges to the Good-Walker paradigm in coherent and incoherent photoproduction
abstract
High-energy vector meson photoproduction is an important tool for studying the partonic structure of matter at low Bjorken$-x$. In the Good-Walker (GW) paradigm, the cross-section $d\sigma/dt$ for coherent production of vector mesons or other final states, depends the average transverse distribution of gluons, while the incoherent cross-section depends on fluctuations in the nuclear structure, due to variations in nucleon positions, and/or gluonic hot spots. However, predictions of the the GW paradigm seemingly conflict with data from multiple experiments which observe coherent production of vector mesons accompanied by nuclear excitation, or in peripheral relativistic heavy-ion collisions. These data are consistent with a simpler, semi-classical approach. We will discuss this contradiction and explore how and why GW fails. We will also contrast the significant differences in incoherent photoproduction on $^{197}$Au and $^{208}$Pb targets in the GW approach with the much smaller expected differences in their low$-x$ gluon content.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Exclusive $\mathrm{J}/\psi$ production off a dilute proton within a refined hotspot description
A hot-spot model with saturation-scale and hotspot-number fluctuations plus a relativistic wave-function correction reproduces HERA exclusive J/psi data, with saturation-scale fluctuations dominating.
-
Ultra-peripheral Collisions
Ultra-peripheral collisions of heavy ions are reviewed as the energy frontier for photon physics; the paper consolidates a decade of LHC/RHIC results and proposes no new measurement.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.