Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Rethinking Certification for Trustworthy Machine Learning-Based Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.16822 v4 pith:YYT2SGEY submitted 2023-05-26 cs.LG cs.DCcs.SE

Rethinking Certification for Trustworthy Machine Learning-Based Applications

classification cs.LG cs.DCcs.SE
keywords applicationscertificationassurancemachinenon-deterministicschemesaddressadoption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine Learning (ML) is increasingly used to implement advanced applications with non-deterministic behavior, which operate on the cloud-edge continuum. The pervasive adoption of ML is urgently calling for assurance solutions assessing applications non-functional properties (e.g., fairness, robustness, privacy) with the aim to improve their trustworthiness. Certification has been clearly identified by policymakers, regulators, and industrial stakeholders as the preferred assurance technique to address this pressing need. Unfortunately, existing certification schemes are not immediately applicable to non-deterministic applications built on ML models. This article analyzes the challenges and deficiencies of current certification schemes, discusses open research issues, and proposes a first certification scheme for ML-based applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.