Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explicit Planning Helps Language Models in Logical Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.15714 v4 pith:YZ5B3ZK4 submitted 2023-03-28 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords planningsystemexplicitlanguagemodelsgpt-3reasoninglogical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models have been shown to perform remarkably well on a wide range of natural language processing tasks. In this paper, we propose LEAP, a novel system that uses language models to perform multi-step logical reasoning and incorporates explicit planning into the inference procedure. Explicit planning enables the system to make more informed reasoning decisions at each step by looking ahead into their future effects. Moreover, we propose a training strategy that safeguards the planning process from being led astray by spurious features. Our full system significantly outperforms other competing methods on multiple standard datasets. When using small T5 models as its core selection and deduction components, our system performs competitively compared to GPT-3 despite having only about 1B parameters (i.e., 175 times smaller than GPT-3). When using GPT-3.5, it significantly outperforms chain-of-thought prompting on the challenging PrOntoQA dataset. We have conducted extensive empirical studies to demonstrate that explicit planning plays a crucial role in the system's performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Laws for State Dynamics in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLM next-state prediction accuracy degrades with larger state spaces and sparser transitions, with state tracking distributed across several attention heads.

Pith tools