Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Correcting Underrepresentation and Intersectional Bias for Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.11112 v4 pith:YZJEL5IR submitted 2023-06-19 cs.LG cs.CYcs.DSstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CYcs.DSstat.ML
keywords intersectionallearningbiasdataunderrepresentationalgorithmempiricaleven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of learning from data corrupted by underrepresentation bias, where positive examples are filtered from the data at different, unknown rates for a fixed number of sensitive groups. We show that with a small amount of unbiased data, we can efficiently estimate the group-wise drop-out rates, even in settings where intersectional group membership makes learning each intersectional rate computationally infeasible. Using these estimates, we construct a reweighting scheme that allows us to approximate the loss of any hypothesis on the true distribution, even if we only observe the empirical error on a biased sample. From this, we present an algorithm encapsulating this learning and reweighting process along with a thorough empirical investigation. Finally, we define a bespoke notion of PAC learnability for the underrepresentation and intersectional bias setting and show that our algorithm permits efficient learning for model classes of finite VC dimension.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding and evaluating computer vision models through the lens of counterfactuals

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Counterfactual-based methods for concept attribution in classifiers and for dynamic bias evaluation and mitigation in text-to-image models.

  2. Mitigate One, Skew Another? Tackling Intersectional Biases in Text-to-Image Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BiasConnect predicts how mitigating bias on one axis shifts bias on another axis in text-to-image models, and InterMit uses that to guide efficient multi-axis bias mitigation.

  3. Algorithmic Approaches to Sequential Decision-Making and Social Epistemology

    cs.DS 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    For improving multi-armed bandits, randomized algorithms achieve a near-tight Θ~(√k) worst-case competitive ratio, and polynomially many historical instances suffice to tune a curvature parameter; pessimism traps and ...

Pith tools