pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16155 · v1 · pith:Z2TGBVN2new · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Study of dark interactions through strong gravitational lenses

F. Villalobos , J. Magana , T. Verdugo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords interacting dark energystrong gravitational lensingcosmic accelerationdark sector interactiondeceleration parameterAbell 1689expansion history reconstructionearly-type galaxy lenses
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong gravitational lensing data support interacting dark energy models with an earlier transition to cosmic acceleration than the standard model predicts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors test three models in which dark matter and dark energy exchange energy through a coupling that flips sign according to the deceleration parameter. They use strong lensing measurements from early-type galaxies and the Abell 1689 cluster to bound the interaction strength. The data prefer negative coupling values larger than those found with supernovae or CMB data. This shifts the redshift at which the universe begins accelerating to between 1.8 and 2.1, while still agreeing with direct expansion-rate measurements from cosmic chronometers. The work demonstrates that lensing provides a fresh, independent route to studying whether the dark sector components interact.

Core claim

Combining strong lensing data on galaxy and cluster scales with three sign-changeable interaction models shows that the interaction parameter beta is negative for all choices of the coupling term Q. These beta values exceed in magnitude those obtained from Type Ia supernovae, CMB, and BAO analyses. The models reconstruct an expansion history in which cosmic acceleration begins at redshifts z_t approximately 1.8 to 2.1, earlier than the LambdaCDM expectation, yet the results stay consistent with cosmic chronometer constraints inside the derived confidence intervals. This establishes strong gravitational lensing as a viable and competitive probe of dark-sector interactions.

What carries the argument

Sign-changeable interaction coupling Q that depends on the deceleration parameter q and scales with dark matter density, dark energy density, or total density, constrained using strong gravitational lensing time-delay and image-position data from early-type galaxies and Abell 1689.

If this is right

  • The interaction strength beta is negative in all three models, pointing to energy transfer between dark components.
  • Beta values are larger in magnitude than those reported from supernovae, CMB, and BAO observations.
  • The deceleration-to-acceleration transition occurs at z_t between 1.8 and 2.1.
  • Reconstructed expansion histories agree with cosmic chronometer data within uncertainties.
  • Strong lensing observations can independently test interacting dark energy scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If these earlier transition redshifts hold, they may ease apparent discrepancies between high-redshift and low-redshift expansion measurements.
  • Applying the same lensing approach to larger samples could help decide which form of the coupling term Q best describes the data.
  • Extensions to weak lensing or other intermediate-redshift probes might map the redshift dependence of any dark interaction.

Load-bearing premise

The measured lensing quantities are assumed to trace the background expansion history cleanly, without substantial bias from uncertainties in modeling the lens mass distributions or from selection effects in the galaxy and cluster samples.

What would settle it

Finding a transition redshift near 0.7 from independent high-redshift expansion measurements or detecting positive interaction strengths across multiple probes would contradict the reported constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16155 by F. Villalobos, J. Magana, T. Verdugo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Joint posterior distributions for the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of the deceleration parameter q(z) (left panels) and the Hubble parameter H(z) (right panels) for three interacting dark energy models. Panels top, middle, and bottom correspond respectively to Q = q(3βHρdm), Q = q(3βHρtot), and Q = q(3βHρDE). Solid lines denote the interacting scenarios, dashed lines the ΛCDM model. The vertical red dashed line indicates the transition redshift zt . Shaded regio… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Evolution of the effective equation of state weff(z) as a function of redshift for the three interacting dark energy models considered in this work: Q ∝ ρdm, Q ∝ ρtot, and Q ∝ ρDE. Solid curves show the posterior me￾dian reconstructions obtained from the strong-lensing joint constraints, while shaded regions represent the 3σ confidence regions. Dashed curves correspond to reconstruction from the constraint… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of the dimensionless interaction parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The possible interaction between the dark components of the Universe (dark matter and dark energy) stands as an attractive alternative to the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model. In this work, we present a novel analysis of three sign-changeable interaction models whose coupling term $Q$ depends explicitly on the deceleration parameter $q$ and is proportional to different energy densities: dark matter, dark energy, and total energy density. To constrain these models, we combine strong gravitational lensing data on two complementary scales: a sample of early-type galaxies acting as lenses and the galaxy cluster Abell 1689. Our results show that the interaction strength $\beta$ depends on the choice of the coupling term $Q$, with all models yielding negative values of $\beta$, indicative of a dark interaction scenario. The $\beta$ values obtained in this work are significantly larger in magnitude than those previously reported using Type Ia supernovae, CMB, and BAO. The strong-lensing constraints indicate a transition to cosmic acceleration at earlier redshifts ($z_t \sim 1.8-2.1$) than that predicted by the $\Lambda$CDM model, while remaining consistent with cosmic chronometer measurements within the reconstructed confidence regions. Therefore, our study shows that strong gravitational lensing data provide an independent and competitive cosmological probe capable of testing interacting dark energy scenarios. The sensitivity of lensing observables to the expansion history enables access to complementary information about dark-sector dynamics beyond standard cosmological probes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines three sign-changeable interacting dark-energy models in which the coupling term Q is proportional to the deceleration parameter q and to one of three energy densities (dark matter, dark energy, or total). Strong-lensing observables from a sample of early-type galaxies and the cluster Abell 1689 are used to constrain the interaction strength β. The reported results are negative β values of larger magnitude than those obtained from SNIa+CMB+BAO, together with an acceleration transition redshift z_t ≈ 1.8–2.1 that is earlier than the ΛCDM prediction while remaining consistent with cosmic-chronometer data.

Significance. If the lensing-derived constraints prove robust, the work establishes strong gravitational lensing as a competitive, independent probe of interacting dark-sector models. The use of two complementary scales (galaxy and cluster) and the explicit q-dependence in Q are positive features that could supply falsifiable predictions for future surveys.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Data and Methodology): the central claim that lensing observables directly encode the background expansion history and yield z_t ∼ 1.8–2.1 rests on the assumption that Einstein radii and image positions are free of significant contamination from lens-mass-profile systematics (SIS or power-law for galaxies; multi-component NFW or free-form for Abell 1689). No explicit marginalization over profile parameters or selection effects is described; any residual mismatch propagates directly into the inferred distance ratios and therefore into β and q(z). This is load-bearing for the reported deviation from ΛCDM.
  2. [§5] §5 (Results): the abstract states negative β values and an earlier z_t without accompanying error budgets, covariance matrices, or tables of best-fit parameters and χ² values. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the larger |β| and the shift in z_t are statistically significant or sensitive to the choice of priors on the lens redshifts and velocity dispersions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] Define the three explicit functional forms of Q(q,ρ) in the introduction or §2 so that the reader can immediately see how each model differs.
  2. [§4] Add a table listing the lens redshifts, Einstein radii, and velocity dispersions used for the early-type galaxy sample.
  3. [Figures] Ensure all figures display 1σ and 2σ contours and label the ΛCDM reference line for direct visual comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. We address each major comment in turn below, indicating where revisions have been made to improve the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Data and Methodology): the central claim that lensing observables directly encode the background expansion history and yield z_t ∼ 1.8–2.1 rests on the assumption that Einstein radii and image positions are free of significant contamination from lens-mass-profile systematics (SIS or power-law for galaxies; multi-component NFW or free-form for Abell 1689). No explicit marginalization over profile parameters or selection effects is described; any residual mismatch propagates directly into the inferred distance ratios and therefore into β and q(z). This is load-bearing for the reported deviation from ΛCDM.

    Authors: We agree that the mass-profile assumptions are important and that explicit checks strengthen the analysis. The original manuscript adopted the SIS profile for the early-type galaxy sample and a multi-component NFW model for Abell 1689, choices justified by the well-studied properties of these systems and consistent with prior lensing studies. To address the referee’s concern directly, the revised §4 now includes marginalization over the power-law density slope for the galaxies and over the NFW concentration parameter for the cluster. A short discussion of possible selection effects has also been added. The updated constraints on β and z_t remain consistent with the original results within the enlarged uncertainties and are reported in the revised §5. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Results): the abstract states negative β values and an earlier z_t without accompanying error budgets, covariance matrices, or tables of best-fit parameters and χ² values. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the larger |β| and the shift in z_t are statistically significant or sensitive to the choice of priors on the lens redshifts and velocity dispersions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the statistical presentation was insufficient. The revised manuscript adds a new table in §5 that reports the best-fit values and 1σ uncertainties for β and z_t in each model, together with χ²/dof and the covariance matrix for the key parameters. We have also added an explicit test of sensitivity to priors on lens redshifts and velocity dispersions, confirming that the negative β values and the shift in z_t are robust. The abstract has been updated to quote the uncertainties on the reported β values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: lensing observables fitted to interaction models yield independent z_t and β constraints

full rationale

The paper constrains three Q(q)-dependent interaction models by fitting β directly to strong-lensing data (Einstein radii and image positions from early-type galaxies plus Abell 1689). The reported transition redshift z_t ∼ 1.8–2.1 is obtained by solving the fitted Friedmann equation for the deceleration-parameter zero-crossing; this is a standard forward prediction from the posterior, not a re-expression of the input data or a self-citation chain. No equations redefine observables in terms of the target quantities, no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior author work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external lensing and chronometer benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on three postulated interaction forms for Q, the assumption that lensing data constrain only the background expansion, and standard FLRW cosmology; no independent evidence is supplied for the interaction term itself.

free parameters (1)
  • β
    Interaction strength parameter fitted to the lensing data for each of the three models.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Background evolution follows the standard Friedmann equations modified by the interaction term Q.
    Invoked to translate lensing observables into constraints on the interaction models.
invented entities (1)
  • sign-changeable interaction term Q(q, ρ) no independent evidence
    purpose: To parameterize energy exchange between dark matter and dark energy that changes sign with the deceleration parameter.
    Postulated in the three models; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the fit is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5799 in / 1327 out tokens · 52781 ms · 2026-05-20T16:11:01.112604+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Caminha, G. B. and Suyu, S. H. and Grillo, C. and Rosati, P. Galaxy cluster strong lensing cosmography - Cosmological constraints from a sample of regular galaxy clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 2022. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141994. arXiv:2110.06232

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141994 2022

  2. [2]

    Discriminating interacting dark energy models using Statefinder diagnostic

    Carrasco, Raul and Rincon, Angel and Saavedra, Joel and Videla, Nelson. Discriminating interacting dark energy models using Statefinder diagnostic. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2024. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12733-6. arXiv:2310.04324

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12733-6 2024

  3. [3]

    On sign-changeable interaction in FLRW cosmology

    Arevalo, Fabiola and Cid, Antonella and Chimento, Luis P. and Mella, Patricio. On sign-changeable interaction in FLRW cosmology. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2019. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6872-7. arXiv:1901.04300

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6872-7 2019

  4. [4]

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    Di Valentino, Eleonora and others. The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics. Phys. Dark Univ. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965. arXiv:2504.01669

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 2025

  5. [5]

    Bolotin, Yu. L. and Kostenko, A. and Lemets, O. A. and Yerokhin, D. A. Cosmological Evolution With Interaction Between Dark Energy And Dark Matter. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 2014. doi:10.1142/S0218271815300074. arXiv:1310.0085

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271815300074 2014

  6. [6]

    Can interacting dark energy solve the $H_0$ tension?

    Can interacting dark energy solve the H _ 0 tension?. Physical Review D , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.043503 , archivePrefix =. 1704.08342 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.043503

  7. [7]

    and Hern \'a ndez-Almada, Alberto and Maga \ n a, Juan and Verdugo, Tom \'a s

    Motta, Ver \'o nica and Garc \' a-Aspeitia, Miguel A. and Hern \'a ndez-Almada, Alberto and Maga \ n a, Juan and Verdugo, Tom \'a s. Taxonomy of Dark Energy Models. Universe. 2021. doi:10.3390/universe7060163. arXiv:2104.04642

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7060163 2021

  8. [8]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    Scolnic, Dan and others. The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release. Astrophys. J. 2022. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a. arXiv:2112.03863

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a 2022

  9. [9]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s ^ -1 Mpc ^ -1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. The Astrophysical Journall , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b , archivePrefix =. 2112.04510 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b 2041

  10. [10]

    G., Filippenko, A

    Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. The Astronomical Journal , year = 1998, volume = 116, pages =. doi:10.1086/300499 , adsurl =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/300499 1998

  11. [11]

    1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

    Measurements of and from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal , year = 1999, volume = 517, pages =. doi:10.1086/307221 , adsurl =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307221 1999

  12. [12]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy and Astrophysics , year = 2020, volume = 641, pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  13. [13]

    Cosmological Constraints on the Sign-Changeable Interactions , volume=

    Wei, Hao , year=. Cosmological Constraints on the Sign-Changeable Interactions , volume=. Communications in Theoretical Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/5/29 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/5/29

  14. [14]

    Testing dark energy models with a new sample of strong-lensing systems , volume=

    Amante, Mario H and Magaña, Juan and Motta, V and García-Aspeitia, Miguel A and Verdugo, Tomás , year=. Testing dark energy models with a new sample of strong-lensing systems , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2760 , number=

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2760

  15. [15]

    Science , year = 2010, volume = 329, pages =

    Cosmological Constraints from Strong Gravitational Lensing in Clusters of Galaxies. Science , year = 2010, volume = 329, pages =. doi:10.1126/science.1185759 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1185759 2010

  16. [16]

    European Physical Journal C , keywords =

    Synchronize your chrono-brane: testing a variable brane tension model with strong gravitational lensing. European Physical Journal C , keywords =. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12434-0 , archivePrefix =. 2401.06376 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12434-0

  17. [17]

    Moresco, Michele and Pozzetti, Lucia and Cimatti, Andrea and Jimenez, Raul and Maraston, Claudia and Verde, Licia and Thomas, Daniel and Citro, Annalisa and Tojeiro, Rita and Wilkinson, David. A 6 \. JCAP. 2016. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014. arXiv:1601.01701

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014 2016

  18. [19]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    In the realm of the Hubble tension-a review of solutions. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d , archivePrefix =. 2103.01183 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d

  19. [20]

    Strong Lensing Modeling in Galaxy Clusters as a Promising Method to Test Cosmography. I. Parametric Dark Energy Models. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aada7d , archivePrefix =. 1711.00829 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aada7d

  20. [21]

    Dynamics of dark energy

    Dynamics of Dark Energy. International Journal of Modern Physics D , keywords =. doi:10.1142/S021827180600942X , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0603057 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x

  21. [22]

    Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests

    Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests. Astrophysics and Space Science , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8 , archivePrefix =. 1205.3421 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1181-8

  22. [23]

    Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures

    Dark matter and dark energy interactions: theoretical challenges, cosmological implications and observational signatures. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096901 , archivePrefix =. 1603.08299 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096901

  23. [24]

    Echo of interactions in the dark sector

    Echo of interactions in the dark sector. Physical Review D , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.103511 , archivePrefix =. 1702.02143 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.103511

  24. [25]

    Cai, Rong-Gen and Su, Qiping , title =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2010 , doi =. 0912.1943 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [26]

    and Ehlers, J

    Schneider, P. and Ehlers, J. and Falco, E. E. , Title =. 1992 , Pages =

    work page 1992

  26. [27]

    Peebles, P. J. E. and Ratra, Bharat , title =. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume =. 2003 , doi =

    work page 2003

  27. [28]

    2020 , publisher =

    Dodelson, Scott and Schmidt, Fabian , title =. 2020 , publisher =

    work page 2020

  28. [29]

    and Richard, J

    Limousin, M. and Richard, J. and Jullo, E. and Kneib, J.-P. and Fort, B. and Soucail, G. and El. Combining Strong and Weak Gravitational Lensing in Abell 1689 , journal =. 2007 , month =

    work page 2007

  29. [30]

    and Kneib, J.-P

    Jullo, E. and Kneib, J.-P. and Limousin, M. and. A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters , journal =. 2007 , volume =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/447 , note =

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/447 2007

  30. [31]

    1999 , note =

    Distance measures in cosmology , author =. 1999 , note =

    work page 1999

  31. [32]

    IEEE transactions on automatic control , volume=

    A new look at the statistical model identification , author=. IEEE transactions on automatic control , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

    work page 1974

  32. [33]

    The annals of statistics , volume=

    Estimating the dimension of a model , author=. The annals of statistics , volume=. 1978 , publisher=

    work page 1978

  33. [34]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant , author =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 1999 , doi =

    work page 1999

  34. [35]

    Model Selection with Strong-lensing Systems

    Leaf, Kyle and Melia, Fulvio , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2018 , doi =. 1805.08640 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [36]

    and Biesiada, M

    Cao, S. and Biesiada, M. and Gavazzi, R. and Pi. Cosmology with Strong Lensing Systems , journal =. 2015 , doi =

    work page 2015

  36. [37]

    Chevallier and D

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , volume =. 2001 , eprint =

    work page 2001

  37. [38]

    Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 2003

  38. [39]

    Jassal, H. K. and Bagla, J. S. and Padmanabhan, T. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.08577.x , url =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.08577.x 2005

  39. [40]

    and Alcaniz, J.S

    Barboza, E.M. and Alcaniz, J.S. , year=. A parametric model for dark energy , volume=. Physics Letters B , publisher=. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.012 , number=

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.012 2008

  40. [41]

    A new class of parametrization for dark energy without divergence , volume=

    Feng, Chao-Jun and Shen, Xian-Yong and Li, Ping and Li, Xin-Zhou , year=. A new class of parametrization for dark energy without divergence , volume=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/023 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/023 2012

  41. [42]

    Sendra, Irene and Lazkoz, Ruth , year=. Supernova and baryon acoustic oscillation constraints on (new) polynomial dark energy parametrizations: current results and forecasts: Constraints on dark energy parametrizations , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20661.x , number=

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20661.x 2012

  42. [43]

    Moresco and A

    M. Moresco and A. Cimatti and R. Jimenez and L. Pozzetti and G. Zamorani and M. Bolzonella and J. Dunlop and F. Lamareille and M. Mignoli and H. Pearce and P. Rosati and D. Stern and L. Verde and E. Zucca and C.M. Carollo and T. Contini and J.-P. Kneib and O. Le Fèvre and S.J. Lilly and V. Mainieri and A. Renzini and M. Scodeggio and I. Balestra and R. Go...

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/006 2012

  43. [44]

    Constraining the expansion rate of the Universe using low-redshift ellipticals as cosmic chronometers , volume=

    Moresco, Michele and Jimenez, Raul and Cimatti, Andrea and Pozzetti, Lucia , year=. Constraining the expansion rate of the Universe using low-redshift ellipticals as cosmic chronometers , volume=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/045 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/045 2011

  44. [45]

    Effects of Anisotropic Stress in Interacting Dark Matter - Dark Energy Scenarios

    Effects of anisotropic stress in interacting dark matter - dark energy scenarios. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2789 , archivePrefix =. 1804.08455 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2789

  45. [46]

    Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =

    Exploring parametrized dark energy models in interacting scenario. Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101951 , archivePrefix =. 2505.16438 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101951 2025

  46. [47]

    Mapping the Cosmological Expansion

    Mapping the cosmological expansion. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/71/5/056901 , archivePrefix =. 0801.2968 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0034-4885/71/5/056901

  47. [48]

    Constraints on cosmological models from strong gravitational lensing systems

    Constraints on cosmological models from strong gravitational lensing systems. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/016 , archivePrefix =. 1105.6226 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/016 2012

  48. [49]

    A magnified glance into the dark sector: probing cosmological models with strong lensing in A1689

    A Magnified Glance into the Dark Sector: Probing Cosmological Models with Strong Lensing in A1689. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/69 , archivePrefix =. 1509.08162 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/1/69

  49. [50]

    Strong Gravitational Lensing and Dark Energy Complementarity

    Strong gravitational lensing and dark energy complementarity. Physical Review D , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043534 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0401433 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.043534

  50. [51]

    Lensing Time Delays and Cosmological Complementarity

    Lensing time delays and cosmological complementarity. Physical Review D , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.123529 , archivePrefix =. 1109.2592 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.123529

  51. [52]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =

    Cosmological constraints on the phenomenological interacting dark energy model with Fermi gamma-ray bursts and DESI DR2. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100534 , archivePrefix =. 2511.16032 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100534 2025

  52. [53]

    Nuclear Physics B , keywords =

    The peculiar case of the Viaggiu holographic dark energy. Nuclear Physics B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117368 , archivePrefix =. 2603.15067 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117368 2026

  53. [54]

    Viaggiu holographic dark energy in light of DESI DR2

    Viaggiu holographic dark energy in light of DESI DR2. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.15178 , archivePrefix =. 2603.15178 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.15178

  54. [55]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Reconstructing the cosmic expansion with a generalized q(z) parameterization: A decelerating Universe from late-time constraints. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    work page

  55. [56]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =

    Further understanding the interaction between dark energy and dark matter: current status and future directions. Reports on Progress in Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad2527 , archivePrefix =. 2402.00819 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad2527

  56. [57]

    Constraints on interacting dark energy models from Planck 2015 and redshift-space distortion data

    Constraints on interacting dark energy models from Planck 2015 and redshift-space distortion data. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/028 , archivePrefix =. 1605.04138 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/028 2015

  57. [58]

    Physical Review D , keywords =

    Interacting dark energy after DESI DR2: A challenge for the CDM paradigm?. Physical Review D , keywords =. doi:10.1103/5y21-k39n , archivePrefix =. 2504.00994 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1103/5y21-k39n

  58. [59]

    Aspects of Everpresent . Part I. A fluctuating cosmological constant from spacetime discreteness. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/047 , archivePrefix =. 2304.03819 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/047 2023

  59. [60]

    The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2

    The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.24732 , archivePrefix =. 2505.24732 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.24732

  60. [61]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Is local H _ 0 at odds with dark energy EFT?. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/004 , archivePrefix =. 2202.03906 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/004 2022

  61. [62]

    Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =

    How much has DESI dark energy evolved since DR1?. Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102268 , archivePrefix =. 2504.04417 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102268 2026

  62. [63]

    Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123519 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.123519 2024