Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Scaling Laws and Representation Learning in Simple Hierarchical Languages: Transformers vs. Convolutional Architectures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.07070 v1 pith:Z3GDLMSL submitted 2025-05-11 cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nnstat.ML

Scaling Laws and Representation Learning in Simple Hierarchical Languages: Transformers vs. Convolutional Architectures

classification cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nnstat.ML
keywords learningscalingstructuredatahierarchicallanguagelawsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

How do neural language models acquire a language's structure when trained for next-token prediction? We address this question by deriving theoretical scaling laws for neural network performance on synthetic datasets generated by the Random Hierarchy Model (RHM) -- an ensemble of probabilistic context-free grammars designed to capture the hierarchical structure of natural language while remaining analytically tractable. Previously, we developed a theory of representation learning based on data correlations that explains how deep learning models capture the hierarchical structure of the data sequentially, one layer at a time. Here, we extend our theoretical framework to account for architectural differences. In particular, we predict and empirically validate that convolutional networks, whose structure aligns with that of the generative process through locality and weight sharing, enjoy a faster scaling of performance compared to transformer models, which rely on global self-attention mechanisms. This finding clarifies the architectural biases underlying neural scaling laws and highlights how representation learning is shaped by the interaction between model architecture and the statistical properties of data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Why Larger Models Learn More: Effects of Capacity, Interference, and Rare-Task Retention

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Larger models succeed on rare and complex tasks by reducing gradient interference from common tasks, allowing rare-task features to accumulate, as shown via synthetic task mixtures and OLMo pretraining from 4M to 4B p...