pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31280 · v1 · pith:Z4HC3KS6new · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-th

Galaxy bias renormalization: Two-loop Power Spectrum, One-loop Trispectrum and Bispectrum

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th
keywords galaxy biasrenormalizationpower spectrumbispectrumtrispectrumloop integralslarge scale structureUV divergences
0
0 comments X

The pith

A complete fifth-order renormalized galaxy bias framework absorbs UV divergences in two-loop power spectra and one-loop bispectra and trispectra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a full treatment of galaxy bias renormalization up to fifth order, including gradient corrections at next-to-leading order. It computes the two-loop power spectrum along with one-loop bispectrum and trispectrum for biased tracers using this framework. Stochastic counterterms are included via operator product expansion to handle UV limits. This matters because it enables consistent joint modeling of multiple clustering statistics in large-scale structure analyses without residual divergences.

Core claim

We present a complete treatment of fifth-order renormalized galaxy bias at the one- and two-loop level in real space, including gradient corrections to deterministic bias operators at next-to-leading order, and provide complete computations of the two-loop power spectrum as well as the one-loop bispectrum and trispectrum, with all UV limits absorbed by the counterterms.

What carries the argument

Renormalized bias operators with stochastic renormalization via operator product expansion at leading order in gradients, solved through renormalization group equations.

If this is right

  • Scale-dependence of higher-gradient bias coefficients becomes pronounced after solving the RG equations.
  • The framework extends easily to higher N-point functions and higher loop orders.
  • Joint modeling of power spectrum, bispectrum, and trispectrum is possible in a fully renormalized way.
  • Results apply to field-level analyses at the operator level.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such renormalization might reduce systematic errors in cosmological inferences from galaxy surveys at small scales.
  • Connections to effective field theory of large-scale structure could be explored by comparing counterterm structures.
  • Testable by comparing predicted scale dependences with simulation measurements of bias coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

That stochastic renormalization of products of operators at coincidence can be captured at leading order in gradients using an operator product expansion.

What would settle it

A direct computation of a loop integral in the trispectrum showing a UV divergence not canceled by the proposed counterterms would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

We present a complete treatment of fifth-order renormalized galaxy bias at the one- and two-loop level in real space, including gradient corrections to deterministic bias operators at next-to-leading order. We then provide a complete computation of the two-loop power spectrum as well as the one-loop bispectrum and trispectrum of biased tracers, and demonstrate how to jointly model these statistics in a fully renormalized framework. These statistics also require stochastic renormalization of products of two, three or four operators at coincidence, which we include at leading order in gradients by means of an operator product expansion. We verify that all UV limits of loop integrals are absorbed by the counterterms we consider. Upon solving the resulting renormalization group equations, we find a pronounced scale-dependence of higher-gradient bias coefficients. Since our renormalization prescription is performed manifestly at the operator level, our results can also easily be extended to higher $N$-point functions, higher loop orders and field-level analyses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a complete treatment of fifth-order renormalized galaxy bias at the one- and two-loop level in real space, including gradient corrections to deterministic bias operators at next-to-leading order. It provides computations of the two-loop power spectrum as well as the one-loop bispectrum and trispectrum of biased tracers in a fully renormalized framework. Stochastic renormalization of products of operators at coincidence is included at leading order in gradients via an operator product expansion. The authors verify that all UV limits of loop integrals are absorbed by the counterterms and solve the renormalization group equations, finding a pronounced scale-dependence of higher-gradient bias coefficients. The operator-level approach allows easy extension to higher N-point functions, higher loop orders, and field-level analyses.

Significance. If the explicit verifications hold, this work advances the modeling of galaxy clustering by supplying a systematic, operator-level renormalization framework for bias at fifth order that consistently handles the two-loop power spectrum and one-loop higher-point functions. The absorption of all UV limits by the included counterterms plus the solved RG equations constitute a clear strength, supporting joint modeling of multiple statistics and extensions beyond the current scope.

minor comments (2)
  1. The notation and definitions for the stochastic OPE contributions could be introduced with one or two explicit low-order examples to improve readability for readers less familiar with the operator product expansion in this context.
  2. Section headings and equation numbering in the renormalization and RG flow parts would benefit from a brief summary table of all counterterms and their scale dependence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, assessment of significance, and recommendation of minor revision. The report contains no specific major comments requiring point-by-point replies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central derivation performs renormalization manifestly at the operator level, explicitly verifies that all UV poles in the two-loop power spectrum, one-loop bispectrum, and trispectrum are absorbed by the included deterministic counterterms plus stochastic OPE contributions, and solves the resulting RG equations to obtain scale dependence. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled from prior work; the verification of pole cancellation and the operator-level treatment are independent of the target statistics. This is the most common honest non-finding for a self-contained EFT calculation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework builds on standard assumptions in cosmological perturbation theory and bias modeling; no new entities are postulated. The bias coefficients themselves function as free parameters whose scale dependence is determined via RG flow but fitted in applications.

free parameters (1)
  • higher-gradient bias coefficients
    Their pronounced scale dependence is found upon solving the renormalization group equations; specific numerical values are not derived from first principles but would be constrained by data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Validity of the perturbative bias expansion up to fifth order in real space
    Invoked throughout the treatment of renormalized bias operators at one- and two-loop level.
  • domain assumption Standard loop integrals in cosmological perturbation theory have UV divergences that can be absorbed by local counterterms
    Central to the verification that all UV limits are absorbed by the considered counterterms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5705 in / 1490 out tokens · 57834 ms · 2026-07-01T04:41:15.714938+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

    R. Akeson, L. Armus, E. Bachelet, V. Bailey, L. Bartusek, A. Bellini et al.,The wide field infrared survey telescope: 100 hubbles for the 2020s, 2019. [5]LSSTcollaboration,LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products,Astrophys. J.873(2019) 111 [0805.2366]

  2. [2]

    Kaiser,On the Spatial correlations of Abell clusters,Astrophys

    N. Kaiser,On the Spatial correlations of Abell clusters,Astrophys. J. Lett.284(1984) L9. – 65 – T able 4: Coefficients fors1L ab2. Continues in Tab. 5. s1L ab2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 − 61 630 − 67 7546 6103 339570 − 1336 18865 − 55679 926100 6585457 44144100 173443573 5562156600 1677259 142619400 422783 19864845 − 930469 15846600 2703971 618017400 −...

  3. [3]

    J. N. Fry and E. Gaztanaga,Biasing and hierarchical statistics in large scale structure, Astrophys. J.413(1993) 447 [astro-ph/9302009]

  4. [4]

    Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS

    P. McDonald and A. Roy,Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS,JCAP08(2009) 020 [0902.0991]

  5. [5]

    Nonlinear Perturbation Theory Integrated with Nonlocal Bias, Redshift-space Distortions, and Primordial Non-Gaussianity

    T. Matsubara,Nonlinear Perturbation Theory Integrated with Nonlocal Bias, Redshift-space Distortions, and Primordial Non-Gaussianity,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 083518 [1102.4619]

  6. [6]

    K. C. Chan, R. Scoccimarro and R. K. Sheth,Gravity and Large-Scale Non-local Bias, Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 083509 [1201.3614]

  7. [7]

    Biased Tracers and Time Evolution

    M. Mirbabayi, F. Schmidt and M. Zaldarriaga,Biased Tracers and Time Evolution,JCAP 07(2015) 030 [1412.5169]. – 66 – T able 5: Coefficients fors1L ab2. See also Tab. 4. s1L ab2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 668 56595 − 668 66885 668 66885 2 − 256 2205 21314 72765 − 23651 56595 100354 509355 − 338 3465 0 2672 18865 − 2672 18865 3 − 256 2205 21314 7276...

  8. [8]

    Bias in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures

    L. Senatore,Bias in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,JCAP11(2015) 007 [1406.7843]

  9. [9]

    Bias Loop Corrections to the Galaxy Bispectrum

    A. Eggemeier, R. Scoccimarro and R. E. Smith,Bias Loop Corrections to the Galaxy Bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 123514 [1812.03208]

  10. [10]

    Large-Scale Galaxy Bias

    V. Desjacques, D. Jeong and F. Schmidt,Large-Scale Galaxy Bias,Phys. Rept.733(2018) 1 [1611.09787]

  11. [11]

    Clustering of dark matter tracers: renormalizing the bias parameters

    P. McDonald,Clustering of dark matter tracers: Renormalizing the bias parameters,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 103512 [astro-ph/0609413]

  12. [12]

    Renormalized Halo Bias

    V. Assassi, D. Baumann, D. Green and M. Zaldarriaga,Renormalized Halo Bias,JCAP 08(2014) 056 [1402.5916]. – 67 – T able 6: Coefficients fors1L a2b2. Continues in Tab. 7. s1L a2b2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 68 21 254 2205 2624 735 0− 2644 13475 0 141664 101871 5856 18865 457616 2546775 0 0 0 3 68 21 254 2205 2624 735 0− 2644 134...

  13. [13]

    Precision measurement of the local bias of dark matter halos

    T. Lazeyras, C. Wagner, T. Baldauf and F. Schmidt,Precision measurement of the local bias of dark matter halos,JCAP02(2016) 018 [1511.01096]

  14. [14]

    Linear response to long wavelength fluctuations using curvature simulations

    T. Baldauf, U. Seljak, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,Linear response to long wavelength fluctuations using curvature simulations,JCAP09(2016) 007 [1511.01465]

  15. [15]

    Y. Li, W. Hu and M. Takada,Separate Universe Consistency Relation and Calibration of Halo Bias,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 063507 [1511.01454]

  16. [16]

    T. Bakx, M. Garny, H. Rubira and Z. Vlah,Two-loop renormalization and running of galaxy bias,JCAP03(2026) 056 [2507.13905]

  17. [17]

    Rubira and F

    H. Rubira and F. Schmidt,Galaxy bias renormalization group,JCAP01(2024) 031 [2307.15031]

  18. [18]

    Rubira and F

    H. Rubira and F. Schmidt,The renormalization group for large-scale structure: origin of galaxy stochasticity,JCAP10(2024) 092 [2404.16929]

  19. [19]

    R. K. Sheth, K. C. Chan and R. Scoccimarro,Nonlocal Lagrangian bias,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 083002 [1207.7117]

  20. [20]

    Schmidt,Sigma-Eight at the Percent Level: The EFT Likelihood in Real Space,JCAP 04(2021) 032 [2009.14176]

    F. Schmidt,Sigma-Eight at the Percent Level: The EFT Likelihood in Real Space,JCAP 04(2021) 032 [2009.14176]. – 68 – T able 7: Coefficients fors1L a2b2. See also Tab. 6. s1L a2b2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 ...

  21. [21]

    Donath, M

    Y. Donath, M. Lewandowski and L. Senatore,Direct signatures of the formation time of galaxies,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 123510 [2307.11409]

  22. [22]

    Fujita and Z

    T. Fujita and Z. Vlah,Perturbative description of biased tracers using consistency relations of LSS,JCAP10(2020) 059 [2003.10114]

  23. [23]

    D’Amico, M

    G. D’Amico, M. Marinucci, M. Pietroni and F. Vernizzi,The large scale structure bootstrap: perturbation theory and bias expansion from symmetries,JCAP10(2021) 069 [2109.09573]

  24. [24]

    Ansari, A

    A. Ansari, A. Banerjee, S. Jain and S. Lalsodagar,Bootstrapping time non-locality in LSS perturbation theory,JCAP11(2025) 084 [2504.01078]

  25. [25]

    Large-Scale Structure of the Universe and Cosmological Perturbation Theory

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga and R. Scoccimarro,Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory,Phys. Rept.367(2002) 1 [astro-ph/0112551]

  26. [26]

    Non-Gaussian Covariance of the Matter Power Spectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure

    D. Bertolini, K. Schutz, M. P. Solon, J. R. Walsh and K. M. Zurek,Non-Gaussian Covariance of the Matter Power Spectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 123505 [1512.07630]

  27. [27]

    The Trispectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure

    D. Bertolini, K. Schutz, M. P. Solon and K. M. Zurek,The Trispectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure,JCAP06(2016) 052 [1604.01770]. – 69 – T able 8: Coefficients ford(5),0 aδ , ˜d(5),1 aδ ,d (5),0 a∇2δ and ˜d(5),i a∇2δ. d(5),0 aδ ˜d(5),1 aδ d(5),0 a∇2δ ˜d(5),1 a∇2δ ˜d(5),2 a∇2δ ˜d(5),3 a∇2δ 1 0 0 0− 1931 859950 79 171990 256 143325 ...

  28. [28]

    The Bispectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure

    T. Baldauf, L. Mercolli, M. Mirbabayi and E. Pajer,The Bispectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure,JCAP05(2015) 007 [1406.4135]

  29. [29]

    Baldauf, M

    T. Baldauf, M. Garny, P. Taule and T. Steele,Two-loop bispectrum of large-scale structure,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123551 [2110.13930]

  30. [30]

    Garny, D

    M. Garny, D. Laxhuber and R. Scoccimarro,Perturbation theory with dispersion and higher cumulants: Nonlinear regime,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 063540 [2210.08089]

  31. [31]

    O. H. E. Philcox, M. M. Ivanov, G. Cabass, M. Simonović, M. Zaldarriaga and T. Nishimichi,Cosmology with the redshift-space galaxy bispectrum monopole at one-loop order,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 043530 [2206.02800]

  32. [32]

    D’Amico, Y

    G. D’Amico, Y. Donath, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore and P. Zhang,The one-loop bispectrum of galaxies in redshift space from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale – 70 – T able 9: Coefficients fors1L ab δ. s1L ab δ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 230 21 230 21 6 10 3 2 82 21 3 0 230 21 230 21 6 10 3 2 82 21 4 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 10 3 10 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 ...

  33. [33]

    Anastasiou, A

    C. Anastasiou, A. Favorito, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore and H. Zheng,Efficient evaluation of the dark-matter two-loop power spectrum in the EFT of LSS,2509.05187

  34. [34]

    Anomalous dimension of subleading-power N-jet operators

    M. Beneke, M. Garny, R. Szafron and J. Wang,Anomalous dimension of subleading-power N-jet operators,JHEP03(2018) 001 [1712.04416]

  35. [35]

    IR-safe and UV-safe integrands in the EFTofLSS with exact time dependence

    M. Lewandowski and L. Senatore,IR-safe and UV-safe integrands in the EFTofLSS with exact time dependence,JCAP08(2017) 037 [1701.07012]

  36. [36]

    S. M. Carroll, S. Leichenauer and J. Pollack,Consistent effective theory of long-wavelength cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 023518 [1310.2920]

  37. [37]

    Rubira and F

    H. Rubira and F. Schmidt,Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation,2511.05484

  38. [38]

    Non-Linear Evolution of the Bispectrum of Cosmological Perturbations

    R. Scoccimarro, S. Colombi, J. N. Fry, J. A. Frieman, E. Hivon and A. Melott,Nonlinear evolution of the bispectrum of cosmological perturbations,Astrophys. J.496(1998) 586 [astro-ph/9704075]

  39. [39]

    Steele and T

    T. Steele and T. Baldauf,Precise Calibration of the One-Loop Trispectrum in the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 103518 [2101.10289]

  40. [40]

    T. Bakx, M. M. Ivanov, O. H. E. Philcox and Z. Vlah,One-Loop Galaxy Bispectrum: Consistent Theory, Efficient Analysis with COBRA, and Implications for Cosmological Parameters,2507.22110. – 71 – T able 10: Coefficients fors1L abtr[Π [1]Π[1]]. s1L abtr[Π [1]Π[1]] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1784 2205 1784 2205 0 296 105 148 35 6376 2205 3 0 1784 2205 ...

  41. [41]

    Spezzati, M

    F. Spezzati, M. Marinucci and M. Simonović,Equivalence of the field-level inference and conventional analyses on large scales,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 063546 [2507.05378]

  42. [42]

    Dark matter clustering: a simple renormalization group approach

    P. McDonald,Dark matter clustering: a simple renormalization group approach,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 043514 [astro-ph/0606028]

  43. [43]

    Nikolis, H

    C. Nikolis, H. Rubira and F. Schmidt,The renormalization group for large-scale structure: primordial non-Gaussianities,JCAP08(2024) 017 [2405.21002]

  44. [44]

    Peron, T

    M. Peron, T. Nishimichi, M. Pietroni and A. Taruya,Renormalized perturbation theory at field-level: the LSS bootstrap in GridSPT,JCAP10(2025) 098 [2506.07105]

  45. [45]

    Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold

    M. Beneke and V. A. Smirnov,Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold, Nucl. Phys. B522(1998) 321 [hep-ph/9711391]

  46. [46]

    Lazeyras and F

    T. Lazeyras and F. Schmidt,A robust measurement of the first higher-derivative bias of dark matter halos,JCAP11(2019) 041 [1904.11294]

  47. [47]

    T. Bakx, N. E. Chisari and Z. Vlah,COBRA: Optimal Factorization of Cosmological Observables,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 191002 [2407.04660]

  48. [48]

    Anastasiou, D

    C. Anastasiou, D. P. L. Bragança, L. Senatore and H. Zheng,Efficiently evaluating loop integrals in the EFTofLSS using QFT integrals with massive propagators,JHEP01(2024) 002 [2212.07421]

  49. [49]

    Cosmological Perturbation Theory Using the FFTLog: Formalism and Connection to QFT Loop Integrals

    M. Simonović, T. Baldauf, M. Zaldarriaga, J. J. Carrasco and J. A. Kollmeier, Cosmological perturbation theory using the FFTLog: formalism and connection to QFT loop integrals,JCAP04(2018) 030 [1708.08130]. – 72 – T able 11: Coefficients fors1L abtr[Π [1]]tr[Π[1]]. s1L abtr[Π [1]]tr[Π[1]] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 17774 735 17774 735 230 7 606 35 ...

  50. [50]

    Fast Large Scale Structure Perturbation Theory using 1D FFTs

    M. Schmittfull, Z. Vlah and P. McDonald,Fast large scale structure perturbation theory using one-dimensional fast Fourier transforms,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 103528 [1603.04405]

  51. [51]

    Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space,Mon

    N. Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.227 (1987) 1

  52. [52]

    The Bispectrum as a Signature of Gravitational Instability in Redshift-Space

    R. Scoccimarro, H. M. P. Couchman and J. A. Frieman,The Bispectrum as a Signature of Gravitational Instability in Redshift-Space,Astrophys. J.517(1999) 531 [astro-ph/9808305]

  53. [53]

    Redshift-Space Distortions, Pairwise Velocities and Nonlinearities

    R. Scoccimarro,Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities and nonlinearities,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 083007 [astro-ph/0407214]

  54. [54]

    Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in 2D: Modeling Redshift-space Power Spectrum from Perturbation Theory

    A. Taruya, T. Nishimichi and S. Saito,Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in 2D: Modeling Redshift-space Power Spectrum from Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 063522 [1006.0699]

  55. [55]

    Precision modeling of redshift-space distortions from multi-point propagator expansion

    A. Taruya, T. Nishimichi and F. Bernardeau,Precision modeling of redshift-space distortions from a multipoint propagator expansion,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 083509 [1301.3624]

  56. [56]

    Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, T. Okumura and V. Desjacques,Distribution function approach to redshift space distortions. Part V: perturbation theory applied to dark matter halos,JCAP 10(2013) 053 [1308.6294]

  57. [57]

    On the EFT of Large Scale Structures in Redshift Space

    M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore, F. Prada, C. Zhao and C.-H. Chuang,EFT of large scale structures in redshift space,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 063526 [1512.06831]

  58. [58]

    Biased Tracers in Redshift Space in the EFT of Large-Scale Structure

    A. Perko, L. Senatore, E. Jennings and R. H. Wechsler,Biased Tracers in Redshift Space in the EFT of Large-Scale Structure,1610.09321

  59. [59]

    S.-F. Chen, Z. Vlah and M. White,Consistent Modeling of Velocity Statistics and Redshift-Space Distortions in One-Loop Perturbation Theory,JCAP07(2020) 062 [2005.00523]

  60. [60]

    Taruya, T

    A. Taruya, T. Nishimichi and D. Jeong,Grid-based calculations of redshift-space matter fluctuations from perturbation theory: UV sensitivity and convergence at the field level, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103507 [2109.06734]

  61. [61]

    Taule and M

    P. Taule and M. Garny,The two-loop power spectrum in redshift space,JCAP11(2023) 078 [2308.07379]

  62. [62]

    Eggemeier, N

    A. Eggemeier, N. Lee, R. Scoccimarro, B. Camacho-Quevedo, A. Pezzotta, M. Crocce et al.,Boosting galaxy clustering analyses with nonperturbative modeling of redshift-space distortions,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 063532 [2501.18597]

  63. [63]

    Z. Vlah, N. E. Chisari and F. Schmidt,An EFT description of galaxy intrinsic alignments, JCAP01(2020) 025 [1910.08085]. – 74 –