Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bombus Species Image Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.11374 v1 pith:Z6HHIX46 submitted 2020-06-09 cs.CV cs.LGstat.ML

Bombus Species Image Classification

classification cs.CV cs.LGstat.ML
keywords speciesbeesbumbleclassificationclassifiersdataimageimages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Entomologists, ecologists and others struggle to rapidly and accurately identify the species of bumble bees they encounter in their field work and research. The current process requires the bees to be mounted, then physically shipped to a taxonomic expert for proper categorization. We investigated whether an image classification system derived from transfer learning can do this task. We used Google Inception, Oxford VGG16 and VGG19 and Microsoft ResNet 50. We found Inception and VGG classifiers were able to make some progress at identifying bumble bee species from the available data, whereas ResNet was not. Individual classifiers achieved accuracies of up to 23% for single species identification and 44% top-3 labels, where a composite model performed better, 27% and 50%. We feel the performance was most hampered by our limited data set of 5,000-plus labeled images of 29 species, with individual species represented by 59 -315 images.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.