REVIEW 1 cited by
Is the information loss problem a paradox?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Is the information loss problem a paradox?
read the original abstract
The aim of this chapter is twofold. First, we introduce the information loss problem; second, we provide a critical assessment by thoroughly inspecting the assumptions underlying its formulations. In particular, we argue that if we work in the regime of validity of semiclassical gravity and do not add additional assumptions that are not necessary for the Hawking calculation, the answer to the question in the title is NO. In other words, the black hole evaporation is certainly unitary as predicted by quantum field theory in curved spacetime. However, if additional assumptions are added, such as a universal area bound on the entropy, contradictions may arise even in regimes where we would expect the semiclassical approximation to be valid. We show that a contradiction indeed arises, but not between the laws of semiclassical general relativity and quantum mechanics, but rather between the former and the additional (holographic) requirement of the area limit, according to which an exterior observer describes a black hole as a quantum system whose entropy is bounded by its area.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Remnant of an Evaporating Rotating Regular Black Hole from the Generalized Entropy in the Final Stage of Evaporation
A rotating regular black hole leaves a remnant because the correction term in the generalized entropy of Hawking radiation vanishes at a finite mass above the extremal limit.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.