Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Sharp Page transitions in generic Hamiltonian dynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Under generic chaotic local Hamiltonian dynamics with energy as the only conserved quantity, the min-entropy peak becomes a true cusp at a well-defined Page time, set by energy diffusion across the subsystem.

desk verdict Convincing Page-curve numerics in a non-integrable chain, but the sharp-cusp claim is extrapolated from Lindblad data that also fits a power law; worth review, not a slam dunk. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03524 v2 pith:Z7JA65YF submitted 2025-02-05 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-th

Lauren H. Li , Stefan Kehrein , Sarang Gopalakrishnan This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechhep-th
keywords Pagecurveentanglementtransitionmin-entropyHamiltonianhydrodynamicthermalizationlevelcrossingLindbladdynamicsRényientropies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the Page transition—the rise and fall of entanglement entropy as a hot subsystem cools—survives in generic, non-integrable local Hamiltonian dynamics where energy is the only conserved quantity. The central claim is that the peak of the min-entropy $S_\infty = -\log \lambda_{\max}$ sharpens to a cusp in the thermodynamic limit at a well-defined Page time, set by the time energy takes to diffuse across the subsystem. The mechanism is a first-order crossing in the entanglement spectrum: the top eigenvalue of the reduced density matrix swaps between two macroscopically distinct states, with a minimum gap that closes roughly exponentially with system size. If correct, singular Page-like transitions are generic in quantum many-body dynamics and remain invisible to local observables, and they can be captured by a hydrodynamic ansatz in which the entanglement Hamiltonian is a locally thermal state with a spatially varying inverse temperature $\beta(x,t)$.

What carries the argument

The central objects are (i) the entanglement Hamiltonian $H_A = -\log \rho_A$, whose low-energy spectrum determines the large eigenvalues of the reduced density matrix; (ii) the hydrodynamic ansatz $\rho_A(t) \propto \exp\big(-\int \beta(x,t)\, h(x)\, dx\big)$, with bond- and site-resolved inverse temperatures $\beta_i$ and a nonequilibrium current term; and (iii) the minimum gap $\min\{\ln \lambda_0 - \ln \lambda_1\}$ at a level crossing, which distinguishes a sharp transition (gap closes exponentially in system size) from a crossover (finite gap). The machinery works by tying each avoided crossing in the entanglement spectrum to a local sign change of $\beta(x,t)$: early crossings involve single local terms and remain open, while the Page-time crossing involves the whole subsystem flipping and closes exponentially. The Landau-Zener-like eigenvector swaps are quantified with the Bhattacharyya distance, and the Lindblad master equation provides a boundary-driven model in which larger systems ($M$ up to 12) can be simulated to test the scaling.

What would settle it

Compute the minimum gap $\min\{\ln \lambda_0 - \ln \lambda_1\}$ at the Page-time crossing in the Lindblad model for $M = 12$ and $M = 14$ with sufficiently fine time sweeps; if the gap saturates at a nonvanishing value rather than continuing to shrink with system size, the claimed exponential closure in the thermodynamic limit is falsified. A complementary check is to measure the $S_\infty$ peak in a cold-atom or superconducting implementation at $M \gtrsim 16$: a true cusp should keep sharpening as $M$ grows, whereas a crossover leaves a rounded maximum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that in a subsystem $A$ of size $M$ initialized in the ceiling state (negative temperature) and coupled to a much larger cold bath, the min-entropy $S_\infty = -\log \lambda_{\max}$ evolves non-monotonically and its maximum becomes a genuine cusp as $M \to \infty$, at a time $t_{\mathrm{Page}}$. This sharpness comes from an isolated level crossing between the top two eigenvalues of $\rho_A$: before $t_{\mathrm{Page}}$ the dominant eigenvector is close to the ground state of $-H$, and after it, the ground state of $H$, which are macroscopically distinct. Numerical evidence from a Lindblad master-equation model with $M = 5,\dots,10$ shows the minimum gap at the Page time decreasing roughly exponentially with $M$ (while the earliest avoided crossing keeps a finite gap), and metastability of the ground state of $H$ as a sharp resonance before the Page time. The paper also constructs a hydrodynamic ansatz $\rho_A(t) \propto \exp\big(-\int \beta(x,t)\, h(x)\, dx\big)$ with a nonequilibrium current correction, verified against exact dynamics for $M=6$, $N=18$ and Lindblad simulations for $M=12$, which accounts for the level crossings and reproduces the Page time. This supports the conclusion that the Page transition is a first-order transition in the entanglement spectrum, and that the Page time is the time at which the effective inverse temperature of the bulk of $A$ changes sign.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative claim of sharpness rests on extrapolating the minimum-gap scaling from Lindblad chains of 5 to 10 sites to the thermodynamic limit, where the data still allow a power-law decay and no size scaling exists for the full unitary dynamics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Page time is set by energy diffusion across region $A$, so in a diffusive system it should grow as $t_{\mathrm{Page}} \sim M^2$ with a system-dependent diffusion constant, rather than being set by scrambling.
  • In generic one-dimensional systems without a finite-temperature phase transition, only the min-entropy ($\alpha = \infty$) sharpens; finite-$\alpha$ Rényi entropies should remain smooth unless the Hamiltonian has a finite-temperature transition.
  • The sharp Page transition leaves local observables analytic: the cusp lives in the entanglement spectrum, so a phase transition appears in a quantity that local probes cannot see.
  • The hydrodynamic ansatz gives a compact description of $\rho_A(t)$, and with randomized-measurement tools it can be used to reconstruct the entanglement Hamiltonian and locate the Page time in experiments with ancilla-based reset, as in superconducting qubit arrays.
  • Boundary-driven Lindblad dynamics with only a few jump operators is enough to host a sharp Page transition, opening the study of entanglement transitions in dissipative spin chains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exponential gap scaling holds, the curvature of the cusp and the width of the metastable region should scale with the same length scale as the gap, giving a measurable exponent that distinguishes a first-order (exponential) from a continuous (power-law) entanglement transition.
  • The hydrodynamic sign-change mechanism suggests a sharp experimental test: measure the local inverse-temperature profile $\beta(x,t)$ via local energy densities and check that the Page time coincides with the zero crossing at the site farthest from the bath; a mismatch would indicate the ansatz misses the mechanism.
  • The gap-closure exponent may differ between unitary full-system dynamics and Lindblad dynamics because in the Lindblad case energy is lost at the boundary; checking whether $t_{\mathrm{Page}}$ still scales as $M^2$ in the unitary case with $N = 3M$ would clarify whether the Markovian bath modifies the transition.
  • By analogy with the island formula, a sharp finite-$\alpha$ Page transition in a two-dimensional system with a finite-temperature phase transition would give a non-analytic von Neumann entropy at $\alpha = 1$, potentially realizing in a tabletop system the type of singularity the island formula predicts for black holes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the entanglement dynamics of a subsystem initialized in a high-energy (negative-temperature) state and coupled to a cold bath, in a nonintegrable mixed-field Ising chain with energy as the only conserved quantity. The authors observe a Page-curve-like non-monotonic evolution of Rényi entropies, identify a sharp peak in the min-entropy at a well-defined Page time, and propose that this peak becomes a cusp in the thermodynamic limit through an exponentially closing gap in the entanglement spectrum. They support this with exact Krylov evolution for small full-system sizes and with larger Lindblad simulations, and they introduce a hydrodynamic ansatz for the entanglement Hamiltonian with site- and bond-dependent inverse temperatures plus a current correction. The paper claims the Page transition is a first-order transition between macroscopically distinct states and discusses implications for quantum simulation and black-hole information ideas.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper extends Page-transition physics from integrable/charge-conserving models to generic nonintegrable local Hamiltonian dynamics, giving a concrete hydrodynamic mechanism for a sharp entanglement transition in a closed quantum system. The strength of the work is that the Page-curve behavior is observed in exact evolution of a small but genuinely nonintegrable system and in an independent Lindblad model, and the entanglement-Hamiltonian ansatz is tested against exact reduced density matrices. The paper also makes falsifiable predictions, for example that finite-index Rényi entropies should become sharp when the Hamiltonian supports a finite-temperature phase transition. However, the quantitative evidence for the thermodynamic-limit sharpness is limited to M=5–10 Lindblad data, and the paper itself concedes that a power-law decay is also consistent with those data; the full-system unitary dynamics, which the title and abstract emphasize, has no size scaling beyond a single M=6, N=18 case. The hydrodynamic explanation also relies on fitting the same parameters that are then used to explain the transition, so the explanatory claim is partly circular.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III B, Fig. 2] The central claim that the min-entropy peak sharpens to a cusp in the thermodynamic limit rests on the minimum gap min{ln λ0 − ln λ1} at the Page time decreasing with system size M in the Lindblad model. Fig. 2b shows data only for M=5,...,10 on a log scale, and the caption explicitly states that a power-law decay could also be consistent with the data due to the large error bars. Since the distinction between an exponential closing and a power-law closing is exactly what decides whether the transition is sharp (first-order) or merely a crossover, this extrapolation is load-bearing and currently underdetermined. The authors should either obtain data over a wider range of M, quantify the goodness of fit for exponential versus power-law forms, or provide a theoretical argument that fixes the scaling form.
  2. [§III (first paragraph) and §II A] The abstract and title claim that the cusp occurs in 'generic Hamiltonian dynamics,' but the quantitative finite-size scaling is performed only in the Lindblad model, while the full-system unitary dynamics is shown only for M=6, N=18. Section III states this explicitly: 'for full-system dynamics, we are unable to study a sufficiently wide range of system sizes to address quantitative size-dependence.' Because the Lindblad dissipator breaks energy conservation and imposes a zero-temperature boundary, an exponential gap in that model does not by itself establish the behavior in the energy-conserving unitary setting. The authors should present at least a preliminary size scaling for the full-system case (even a few additional M values, e.g., M=4,5,6,7 with fixed ratio N=3M), or clearly restrict the sharpness claim to the Lindblad model and provide a separate argument for why the unitary case should behave identically.
  3. [§IV, Eqs. (8)–(9)] The hydrodynamic explanation fits the free parameters β_i(t), β_{i,i+1}(t), and J^ZX_i(t) to the exact reduced density matrix, and then uses those same fitted profiles to account for the Page transition and to conjecture finite-α sharpness. As presented, this is a consistency check rather than a predictive derivation. To make the explanation load-bearing, the authors should provide an independent test: for example, obtain β(x,t) from an energy-diffusion equation (with the diffusion constant and boundary condition computed independently) and compare the predicted Page time and gap scaling with the exact results, or verify that the fitted profiles reproduce observables not used in the fit. Without such a test, the hydrodynamic mechanism remains a plausible interpretation rather than a demonstrated mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§II B] There is a typo near 'This approach allows us to simulation systems with M = 10, 12'; it should read 'to simulate systems.'
  2. [§III A, Fig. 1 caption] The figure caption says 'The vertical lines mark the time of the first crossover and the Page time' for panels (g) and (h), but the main text does not explicitly define how the first crossover time is located; a short definition would improve clarity.
  3. [§III B, Fig. 2] The error bars in Fig. 2 are stated to be estimated from the resolution of the sampling; the authors should also discuss possible systematic errors from the finite time-step of the Trotterized Lindblad evolution, especially for the smallest gaps.
  4. [§V] The last sentence of the abstract promises 'conditions under which the Page transition should remain sharp even for Rényi entropies of finite index α,' but the discussion in §V formulates this only as a future direction dependent on the existence of a finite-temperature phase transition. The abstract should be phrased as a conjecture or the corresponding condition should be stated more precisely.
  5. [Supplemental S5] There is a typo in the phrase 'our ansatz is indeeed a good approximation'; it should read 'indeed.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the sharp Page-transition claim is anchored in direct, independently extracted entanglement-spectrum data, while the hydrodynamic ansatz is explicitly fitted and used descriptively; self-citations are background.

full rationale

The central claim that the min-entropy peak sharpens to a cusp at the Page time is established in Sec. III by direct numerical analysis of the exact dynamics: the largest eigenvalues of the reduced density matrix are tracked, the minimum gap at the avoided crossing is extracted as a function of M, and the eigenvector change is characterized via the Bhattacharyya distance. None of these observations requires the hydrodynamic ansatz, so the sharpness claim does not reduce to that ansatz. The hydrodynamic section (Sec. IV) is explicitly an interpretative layer: "In practice, since we are working with small systems, we determine the profile of β(x, t) by fitting the exact time-evolved state to the form of Eq. (8)." Because the β profiles are fitted in-sample, the statement that zeros of β coincide with the previously observed level crossings, and that the ansatz 'accounts for' the Page transition, is a descriptive mapping rather than an independent prediction of the transition; this is an interpretation and over-fitting caveat, not circularity in the sense of a prediction being equivalent to its input by construction. The paper itself flags the main evidence-quality limitations: Fig. 2's caption concedes "a power law decay could also be consistent with the data due to the large error bars", and Sec. III states that quantitative size-dependence is studied only in the Lindblad model, with only M=6, N=18 shown for full-system dynamics. These concessions weaken the thermodynamic-limit extrapolation for 'generic Hamiltonian dynamics', but they are robustness concerns, not circular steps. The self-citations ([16], [20], and the hydrodynamics reference [28] involving one author) are used as background for charge-conserved analogs or as a standard assumption; they are not load-bearing for the energy-only sharpness claim, and no external benchmark is contradicted. Therefore no circular step meets the quoted-reduction standard, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The direct Page-curve observation is independent of the ansatz, but the hydrodynamic interpretation and the finite-alpha conjecture rest on site and bond inverse temperatures and current coefficients that are fitted to the exact time-evolved state. The paper also assumes nonintegrability, local thermalization, diffusive energy transport, Markovian-bath faithfulness, and macroscopic distinctness of ground states of H and -H. No new physical entity is proposed; the only invented element is the fitted current correction in the ansatz.

free parameters (4)
  • Site inverse temperatures beta_i(t) = time-dependent, fitted to exact rho_A(t)
    Introduced in Eq. (8) and fitted to the exact time-evolved density matrix for each site i and time t; used to interpret crossings.
  • Bond inverse temperatures beta_{i,i+1}(t) = time-dependent, fitted to exact rho_A(t)
    Separate bond temperatures added in Eq. (10); fitted to the same exact state, with no independent prediction.
  • Current coefficients J^ZX_i(t) = time-dependent, fitted to exact rho_A(t)
    Nonequilibrium current terms added in Eq. (10) to reduce fitting error of the local-thermal ansatz; fitted, not predicted.
  • Lindblad dissipation rate gamma = unspecified
    Appears in Eq. (3) but no numerical value is given anywhere in the paper; required to reproduce the Lindblad simulations.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Mixed-field Ising chain at h = 0.809, g = 0.905, J = 1 is robustly nonintegrable.
    Sec. II and Ref. [25]; needed so ETH, local thermalization, and diffusive hydrodynamics apply.
  • domain assumption rho_A(t) rapidly becomes locally thermal with a slowly varying inverse temperature beta(x,t).
    Sec. IV Eq. (8); standard hydrodynamic assumption and the basis of the whole interpretation.
  • domain assumption Energy transport in the chain is diffusive and determines beta(x,t).
    Sec. IV; used to argue crossings accumulate and the Page time is set by the diffusion time; not derived.
  • domain assumption The Markovian Lindblad bath is a faithful stand-in for a large cold bath for the Page transition.
    Sec. II B and Sec. III; allows larger M, but only qualitative similarity to full-system dynamics is demonstrated.
  • domain assumption Ground states of H and -H are macroscopically distinct.
    Sec. IV toy model; used to call the Page transition first-order; no proof is provided.
  • domain assumption For highly excited eigenstates, rho_A is proportional to exp(-beta H) under ETH.
    Sec. I and Refs. [22-24]; motivates writing the entanglement Hamiltonian as beta H, not relied on by the direct numerics.
invented entities (1)
  • Nonequilibrium current operator J^ZX_i(t) sigma^z_i sigma^x_{i+1}
    purpose: Phenomenological correction to the local-thermal ansatz so Eq. (8) fits the exact rho_A(t) better.
    Introduced ad hoc in Sec. IV Eq. (10); the coefficients are fit to the same data being explained, and no out-of-sample prediction is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp Page transitions in generic Hamiltonian dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z7JA65YF

@misc{pith2026250203524,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp Page transitions in generic Hamiltonian dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z7JA65YF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03524}
}
abstract

We consider the entanglement dynamics of a subsystem initialized in a pure state at high energy density (corresponding to negative temperature) and coupled to a cold bath. The subsystem's R\'enyi entropies $S_\alpha$ first rise as the subsystem gets entangled with the bath and then fall as the subsystem cools. We find that the peak of the min-entropy, $\lim_{\alpha \to \infty} S_\alpha$, sharpens to a cusp in the thermodynamic limit at a well-defined time we call the Page time. We construct a hydrodynamic ansatz for the evolution of the entanglement Hamiltonian, which accounts for the sharp Page transition as well as the intricate dynamics of the entanglement spectrum before the Page time. Our results hold both when the bath has the same Hamiltonian as the system and when the bath is taken to be Markovian. Our ansatz suggests conditions under which the Page transition should remain sharp even for R\'enyi entropies of finite index $\alpha$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03524 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Existence of Page-curve in non-integrable systems. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Minimum difference between the log of the top two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Hydrodynamic interpretation. (a) Energy profile of the top eigenvector of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Page Curve and Entanglement Dynamics in an Interacting Fermionic Chain

    quant-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In an interacting fermionic chain coupled to a reservoir, the entanglement entropy follows a Page curve and the min-entropy develops a non-analyticity whose thermodynamic-limit critical time vanishes as interactions grow.

  2. Extreme dynamics and relaxation of quantum gases: A hydrodynamic approach

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    For a polytropic quantum gas, the paper claims a shock-front expansion with cloud size growing as a power of time, plus damped relaxation modes for a trapped gas; the vacuum shock result is physically problematic.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. Polchinski, in New Frontiers in Fields and Strings: TASI 2015 Proceedings of the 2015 Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (World Scientific, 2017) pp. 353–397

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Almheiri, D

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics 2013, 1 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Black Hole Complementarity and the Harlow-Hayden Conjecture

    L. Susskind, arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.4505 (2013)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Harlow and P

    D. Harlow and P. Hayden, Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, 1 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Akers, N

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, D. Harlow, G. Penington, and S. Vardhan, Journal of High Energy Physics 2024, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    I. H. Kim and J. Preskill, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    DeWolfe and K

    O. DeWolfe and K. Higginbotham, Journal of High En- ergy Physics 2023, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    R. Li, X. Wang, K. Zhang, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044005 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Engelhardt, ˚A

    N. Engelhardt, ˚A. Folkestad, A. Levine, E. Verheijden, and L. Yang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03425 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    D. N. Page, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013, 028 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Bianchi and P

    E. Bianchi and P. Don` a, Phys. Rev. D 100, 105010 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Blake and A

    M. Blake and A. P. Thompson, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 1 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Glatthard, Phys

    J. Glatthard, Phys. Rev. D 109, L081901 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Agarwal and N

    K. Agarwal and N. Bao, Phys. Rev. D 102, 086017 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Piroli, C

    L. Piroli, C. S¨ underhauf, and X.-L. Qi, Journal of High Energy Physics 2020, 1 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Kehrein, Phys

    S. Kehrein, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224308 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    M. Saha, M. Kulkarni, and A. Dhar, Physical Review Letters 133, 230402 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Glatthard, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09082 (2025)

    J. Glatthard, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09082 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ganguly, P

    K. Ganguly, P. Gopalakrishnan, A. Naik, B. K. Agar- walla, and M. Kulkarni, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12110 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    R. Jha, S. R. Manmana, and S. Kehrein, in preparation (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalat- tore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    J. R. Garrison and T. Grover, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021026 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    W. Zhu, Z. Huang, Y.-C. He, and X. Wen, Physical review letters 124, 100605 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Kim and D

    H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Physical review letters 111, 127205 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    X. Mi, A. Michailidis, S. Shabani, K. Miao, P. Klimov, J. Lloyd, E. Rosenberg, R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, T. An- dersen, et al., Science 383, 1332 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Fukunaga, Introduction to statistical pattern recogni- tion (Elsevier, 2013)

    K. Fukunaga, Introduction to statistical pattern recogni- tion (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    V. B. Bulchandani, S. Gopalakrishnan, and E. Ilievski, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment 2021, 084001 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Elben, S

    A. Elben, S. T. Flammia, H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 9 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    M. K. Joshi, C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, F. Kranzl, T. V. Zache, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, Nature 624, 539 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Kokail, R

    C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, A. Elben, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, Nature Physics 17, 936 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Brydges, A

    T. Brydges, A. Elben, P. Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P. Lanyon, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Science 364, 260 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    M. K. Joshi, A. Elben, B. Vermersch, T. Brydges, C. Maier, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 240505 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, J. High Energy Phys. 12, 1 (2019). 8

    2019

  27. [35]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, J. High Energy Phys. 5, 1 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    6yH12Vlz0niSDD67+EmJBnj08nE=

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, J. High Energy Phys. 3, 1 (2020). Supplemental Materials: Sharp Page transitions in generic Hamiltonian dynamics Lauren H. Li, 1 Stefan Kehrein, 2 and Sarang Gopalakrishnan 3 1Department of Physics, Princeton University, Prin...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.