Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

Agent RL Scaling Law: Agent RL with Spontaneous Code Execution for Mathematical Problem Solving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.07773 v4 pith:ZCMT7GW5 submitted 2025-05-12 cs.AI

Agent RL Scaling Law: Agent RL with Spontaneous Code Execution for Mathematical Problem Solving

classification cs.AI
keywords codeexecutionreasoningtrainingagentmathematicalasyncfindings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with mathematical reasoning tasks requiring precise, verifiable computation. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) from outcome-based rewards enhances text-based reasoning, understanding how agents autonomously learn to leverage external tools like code execution remains crucial. We investigate RL from outcome-based rewards for Tool-Integrated Reasoning, ZeroTIR, training base LLMs to spontaneously generate and execute Python code for mathematical problems without supervised tool-use examples. Our central contribution is we demonstrate that as RL training progresses, key metrics scale predictably. Specifically, we observe strong positive correlations where increased training steps lead to increases in the spontaneous code execution frequency, the average response length, and, critically, the final task accuracy. This suggests a quantifiable relationship between computational effort invested in training and the emergence of effective, tool-augmented reasoning strategies. We implement a robust framework featuring a decoupled code execution environment and validate our findings across standard RL algorithms and frameworks. Experiments show ZeroTIR significantly surpasses non-tool ZeroRL baselines on challenging math benchmarks. Our findings provide a foundational understanding of how autonomous tool use is acquired and scales within Agent RL, offering a reproducible benchmark for future studies. Code is released at \href{https://github.com/yyht/openrlhf_async_pipline}{https://github.com/yyht/openrlhf\_async\_pipline}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ReSum: Synergizing LLM Reasoning and Summarization with Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ReSum trains LLMs via RLVR to self-summarize reasoning trajectories, yielding 4% average performance gains and 18.6% shorter rollouts through contrastive rollout branches.

  2. CostBench: Evaluating Multi-Turn Cost-Optimal Planning and Adaptation in Dynamic Environments for LLM Tool-Use Agents

    cs.AI 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CostBench is a new travel-planning benchmark showing that leading LLM agents often fail to select cost-optimal tool sequences and drop sharply in performance when facing dynamic events like tool failures or cost changes.

  3. PruneTIR: Inference-Time Tool Call Pruning for Effective yet Efficient Tool-Integrated Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PruneTIR prunes erroneous tool-call trajectories during LLM inference via three trigger-based components to raise Pass@1 accuracy and efficiency while shortening context.

  4. Walk the Talk: Bridging the Reasoning-Action Gap for Thinking with Images via Multimodal Agentic Policy Optimization

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MAPO improves multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning by requiring explicit textual descriptions of visual tool results and using a novel advantage estimator that combines semantic alignment with task rewards.

  5. Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Radiology Report Generation

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MARL-Rad trains region-specific and global agents with reinforcement learning on clinical rewards to produce more accurate radiology reports than prior methods on MIMIC-CXR and IU X-ray datasets.

  6. ReSeek: A Self-Correcting Framework for Search Agents with Instructive Rewards

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ReSeek adds self-correction via a JUDGE action and a dense instructive reward (correctness plus utility) to RL training of search agents, yielding higher success and faithfulness on a new contamination-resistant benchmark.

  7. Latent Visual States for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    EVA generates adaptive Latent_slot tokens as internal visual thoughts, trained end-to-end with text tokens via D-GSPO on the EVA-230K dataset, claiming performance gains and better inference efficiency.

  8. STARE: Surprisal-Guided Token-Level Advantage Reweighting for Policy Entropy Stability

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    STARE applies surprisal-guided token-level advantage reweighting plus a target-entropy gate to stabilize entropy in GRPO RL for LLMs, yielding stable training and 4-8% gains on AIME24/25 over baselines.

  9. IAPO: Input Attribution-Aware Policy Optimization for Tool Use in Small Multimodal Agents

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    IAPO is an RL method that aligns model input attributions with a teacher to improve tool-calling in multimodal SLMs, reporting 3% average VQA accuracy gains on Qwen2.5-VL-3B across six tests.

  10. Mini-o3: Scaling Up Reasoning Patterns and Interaction Turns for Visual Search

    cs.CV 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Mini-o3 scales visual search reasoning to tens of interaction turns via a new probe dataset, iterative trajectory collection, and over-turn masking in RL, claiming SOTA performance while training only up to six turns.

  11. Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper reviews conceptual foundations, methodological innovations, effective designs, critical challenges, and future directions for LLM-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning.

  12. Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper surveys the conceptual foundations, methodological innovations, challenges, and future directions of agentic reinforcement learning frameworks that embed cognitive capabilities like meta-reasoning and self-r...

  13. Rethinking Agentic Reinforcement Learning In Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This review synthesizes conceptual foundations, methods, challenges, and future directions for agentic reinforcement learning in large language models.