Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.00273 v3 pith:ZJAT42LN submitted 2023-12-01 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords watermarklanguagetextbenchmarkdetectmarkmodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The capabilities of large language models have grown significantly in recent years and so too have concerns about their misuse. It is important to be able to distinguish machine-generated text from human-authored content. Prior works have proposed numerous schemes to watermark text, which would benefit from a systematic evaluation framework. This work focuses on LLM output watermarking techniques - as opposed to image or model watermarks - and proposes Mark My Words, a comprehensive benchmark for them under different natural language tasks. We focus on three main metrics: quality, size (i.e., the number of tokens needed to detect a watermark), and tamper resistance (i.e., the ability to detect a watermark after perturbing marked text). Current watermarking techniques are nearly practical enough for real-world use: Kirchenbauer et al. [33]'s scheme can watermark models like Llama 2 7B-chat or Mistral-7B-Instruct with no perceivable loss in quality on natural language tasks, the watermark can be detected with fewer than 100 tokens, and their scheme offers good tamper resistance to simple perturbations. However, they struggle to efficiently watermark code generations. We publicly release our benchmark (https://github.com/wagner-group/MarkMyWords).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimal Estimation of Watermark Proportions in Hybrid AI-Human Texts

    stat.ML 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For continuous-score text watermarks, the proportion of watermarked tokens in mixed AI-human text is identifiable and can be estimated at the minimax-optimal rate.

  2. StealthInk: A Multi-bit and Stealthy Watermark for Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A message-dependent token-reweighting method embeds multi-bit provenance data into LLM output while preserving the expected output distribution.

Pith tools