pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07070 · v1 · pith:ZK46K4ZEnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Gravitational waveforms from binaries in higher-derivative gravity: a Love story

Pablo A. Cano , Francesco Fucito , Jose F. Morales , Alejandro Ruip\'erez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords gravitational waveformshigher-derivative gravityblack hole perturbationspost-Newtonian expansionLove numbersbinary systemsenergy fluxesmaster equations
0
0 comments X

The pith

In higher-derivative gravity, waveform and flux corrections from black hole binaries first appear at 5PN order and scale directly with the quadrupolar Love number.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines gravitational wave emission by a test particle in circular orbit around a non-rotating black hole when the gravity theory includes cubic and quartic curvature terms. It derives the even- and odd-parity master equations for metric perturbations sourced by the particle, solves them via a post-Minkowskian expansion, and extracts the post-Newtonian series for the waveform and the radiated fluxes. The central result is that every higher-derivative correction enters at fifth post-Newtonian order and is fixed by a single number: the Love number that measures how the black hole geometry responds to an ℓ=2 tidal field. A reader would care because this supplies a universal parameterization for modified-gravity effects inside existing waveform models used by detectors.

Core claim

Higher-derivative corrections arising from cubic and quartic Riemann contractions modify the gravitational waveform and the energy and angular-momentum fluxes. These modifications appear first at fifth post-Newtonian order for circular orbits and are proportional to the ℓ=2 Love number that quantifies the deformability of the black hole geometry under even-parity quadrupolar perturbations. The proportionality is obtained by constructing post-Minkowskian solutions to the sourced master equations and then taking their post-Newtonian limit; the same factor multiplies the corrections in both even- and odd-parity sectors.

What carries the argument

The ℓ=2 Love number of the black hole geometry, which multiplies every higher-derivative correction to the waveform and fluxes at 5PN order.

If this is right

  • Waveform templates can be corrected at leading order by rescaling the phase with a single Love-number parameter.
  • The same multiplicative factor appears in the energy flux and the angular-momentum flux, preserving consistency between radiation and orbital evolution.
  • The result is independent of the specific numerical coefficients of the cubic and quartic terms provided the master equations retain their form.
  • Numerical integration of the master equations confirms the analytic 5PN prediction and extends it to moderate orbital velocities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Observers could therefore place bounds on higher-derivative couplings by extracting an effective Love number from the accumulated phase of detected signals.
  • The reduction to a single parameter might survive for slowly spinning black holes if the master-equation structure is preserved.
  • It would be useful to test whether the same Love-number proportionality continues to hold for eccentric orbits or higher multipole moments.

Load-bearing premise

Higher-derivative terms can be treated as a small perturbation around the Schwarzschild background that leaves the master-equation structure intact and lets the single ℓ=2 Love number capture all deformability effects at fifth post-Newtonian order.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the 5PN waveform coefficient in a higher-derivative theory where the ℓ=2 Love number is set to zero while the curvature couplings remain nonzero; a nonzero correction would disprove the claimed proportionality.

read the original abstract

We study the emission of gravitational waves by a test particle orbiting a non-rotating black hole in higher-derivative gravity theories with cubic and quartic contractions of the Riemann tensor. To this aim, we first derive the master equations describing even- and odd-parity perturbations in the presence of an arbitrary source term, and then construct a Post-Minkowskian expansion of the solutions to the homogeneous master equations. Specializing to a circular binary system, we compute the Post-Newtonian expansion of the waveform, as well as the energy and angular-momentum fluxes at infinity. We show that higher-derivative corrections to the waveform and to the fluxes always appear at 5PN order, and are universally proportional to the Love number describing the deformability of the geometry under the $\ell=2$ mode perturbation. These analytical results are validated against numerical computations, which also allow us to extend the analysis to larger velocities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives even- and odd-parity master equations for metric perturbations of a Schwarzschild background in the presence of cubic and quartic higher-derivative curvature terms, constructs a Post-Minkowskian expansion of the homogeneous solutions, and specializes to circular orbits to obtain the PN expansion of the gravitational waveform together with the energy and angular-momentum fluxes at infinity. It claims that all higher-derivative corrections first appear at 5PN order and are universally proportional to the ℓ=2 tidal Love number of the background geometry; these analytic results are stated to be validated by numerical computations that also extend the analysis to higher velocities.

Significance. If the central universality result holds, the work supplies a concrete, observationally accessible relation between waveform corrections in higher-derivative gravity and a single, gauge-invariant Love number, which could be used to place model-independent bounds on cubic and quartic curvature couplings from binary inspirals. The combination of an analytic 5PN derivation with numerical cross-checks is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 and the Post-Minkowskian expansion paragraph] The abstract and §4 claim that higher-derivative corrections appear exclusively at 5PN and are strictly proportional to the ℓ=2 Love number. This universality rests on the assertion that the modified master equations and source matching introduce no independent constants or Wronskian normalizations at the same order; the manuscript sketches the Post-Minkowskian construction but does not exhibit the explicit 5PN coefficient or demonstrate that extra homogeneous solutions are absent (see the skeptic note on source-term handling).
  2. [Numerical validation section] The numerical validation is invoked to confirm the analytic 5PN results, yet no error analysis, convergence tests, or comparison of the extracted proportionality constant against the independently computed Love number is provided. Without these, it is impossible to verify that the numerical data do not inadvertently fit an extra free parameter at 5PN.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Master-equation derivation] Notation for the even- and odd-parity master equations should be unified with a single reference to the background curvature invariants that enter the effective potential.
  2. [Introduction and assumptions paragraph] The statement that the higher-derivative terms are treated as a small perturbation should be accompanied by an explicit bound on the coupling constants relative to the orbital velocity at 5PN.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the detailed comments. We respond to the major comments below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested explicit details and numerical validations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 and the Post-Minkowskian expansion paragraph] The abstract and §4 claim that higher-derivative corrections appear exclusively at 5PN and are strictly proportional to the ℓ=2 Love number. This universality rests on the assertion that the modified master equations and source matching introduce no independent constants or Wronskian normalizations at the same order; the manuscript sketches the Post-Minkowskian construction but does not exhibit the explicit 5PN coefficient or demonstrate that extra homogeneous solutions are absent (see the skeptic note on source-term handling).

    Authors: We agree that the Post-Minkowskian expansion is presented schematically and that an explicit 5PN coefficient would strengthen the claim. The master equations are constructed such that higher-derivative terms modify the effective potential in a manner that couples exclusively to the ℓ=2 tidal response of the background; the homogeneous solutions are fixed uniquely by regularity at the horizon and outgoing-wave conditions at infinity, with the Wronskian normalization determined by the standard procedure and introducing no additional constants at 5PN. Source matching for the circular-orbit stress-energy tensor proceeds order-by-order in the PM expansion and, owing to the angular and parity structure of the source, does not excite extraneous homogeneous solutions at this order. In the revised manuscript we will display the explicit 5PN waveform and flux corrections, confirming direct proportionality to the Love number, and will expand the discussion of source-term matching. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical validation section] The numerical validation is invoked to confirm the analytic 5PN results, yet no error analysis, convergence tests, or comparison of the extracted proportionality constant against the independently computed Love number is provided. Without these, it is impossible to verify that the numerical data do not inadvertently fit an extra free parameter at 5PN.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the numerical section lacks the quantitative supporting material needed to fully substantiate the validation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection containing: (i) an error budget with estimated truncation and round-off uncertainties, (ii) convergence tests under successive refinement of spatial and temporal resolution, and (iii) a direct numerical comparison of the extracted 5PN proportionality constant against the independently computed ℓ=2 Love number of the background geometry. These additions will demonstrate that the numerical results align with the analytic prediction without requiring any additional free parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation from modified master equations yields proportionality as output

full rationale

The paper derives even- and odd-parity master equations for perturbations on a higher-derivative-corrected Schwarzschild background, constructs Post-Minkowskian homogeneous solutions, specializes to circular orbits, and extracts the PN waveform and fluxes. The result that corrections enter at 5PN and are proportional to the ℓ=2 Love number follows from solving those equations; the Love number itself is an asymptotic coefficient extracted from the same perturbation problem rather than an input that forces the outcome by definition. No fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, no self-citation chain supplies the uniqueness or ansatz, and numerical validation is performed independently. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard linearized perturbation framework around a Schwarzschild background and on the existence of well-defined master equations for even/odd parity; no new free parameters beyond the theory coefficients are introduced in the abstract, and the Love number is treated as a derived quantity rather than a fitted input.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linearized perturbation equations around Schwarzschild remain valid when cubic and quartic Riemann terms are added perturbatively.
    Invoked when deriving the master equations for even- and odd-parity perturbations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5696 in / 1314 out tokens · 17667 ms · 2026-06-27T21:28:40.026381+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 24 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002

    2010

  2. [2]

    Cardoso, E

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani and G. Raposo,Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 084014, [1701.01116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Di Russo, F

    G. Di Russo, F. Fucito and J. F. Morales,Tidal resonances for fuzzballs,JHEP04(2024) 149, [2402.06621]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales, P. Pani and G. Raposo,The multipolar structure of fuzzballs,JHEP01(2021) 003, [2008.01445]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Cardoso, S

    V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela and P. Pani,Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 084031, [1608.08637]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Ikeda, M

    T. Ikeda, M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales, P. Pani et al.,Black-hole microstate spectroscopy: Ringdown, quasinormal modes, and echoes,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 066021, [2103.10960]. – 40 –

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Blanchet,Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,Living Rev

    L. Blanchet,Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 2, [1310.1528]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Berti et al.,Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,2505.23895

    E. Berti et al.,Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,2505.23895

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli and L. Senatore,Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 251105, [1808.08962]

    arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Cai and K.-D

    S. Cai and K.-D. Wang,Non-vanishing of tidal Love numbers,1906.06850

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  11. [11]

    De Luca, J

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury and S. S. C. Wong,Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 044066, [2211.14325]

    arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Katagiri, V

    T. Katagiri, V. Cardoso, T. Ikeda and K. Yagi,Tidal response beyond vacuum general relativity with a canonical definition,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 084081, [2410.02531]

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Barbosa, P

    S. Barbosa, P. Brax, S. Fichet and L. de Souza,Running Love numbers and the Effective Field Theory of gravity,JCAP07(2025) 071, [2501.18684]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    P. A. Cano,Love numbers beyond GR from the modified Teukolsky equation,JHEP07(2025) 152, [2502.20185]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    L. Wang, L. Lehner, M. Micol and R. Sturani,Matching Tidal Deformability (Wilson) Coefficients to Black Hole Love Numbers in Higher-Curvature Gravity,2604.04259

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog and S. Maenaut,Gravitational ringing of rotating black holes in higher-derivative gravity,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 024064, [2110.11378]

    arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    D. Li, A. Hussain, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, N. Yunes and A. Zimmerman,Isospectrality breaking in the Teukolsky formalism,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 104026, [2310.06033]

    arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    P. A. Cano and M. David,Isospectrality in Effective Field Theory Extensions of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 191401, [2407.12080]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians,Nucl

    J. Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians,Nucl. Phys. B231(1984) 269–295

    1984

  20. [20]

    G. P. Lepage,What is Renormalization?, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, 6, 1989.hep-ph/0506330

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1989

  21. [21]

    Baker, D

    T. Baker, D. Psaltis and C. Skordis,Linking Tests of Gravity On All Scales: from the Strong-Field Regime to Cosmology,Astrophys. J.802(2015) 63, [1412.3455]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    C. M. Will,The Confrontation between general relativity and experiment,Living Rev. Rel.9 (2006) 3, [gr-qc/0510072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Endlich, V

    S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang and L. Senatore,An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves,JHEP09(2017) 122, [1704.01590]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Gruzinov and M

    A. Gruzinov and M. Kleban,Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 3521–3524, [hep-th/0612015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling,JHEP02(2016) 020, [1407.5597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    P. A. Cano and A. Ruipérez,Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry,JHEP 05(2019) 189, [1901.01315]

    arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Sennett, R

    N. Sennett, R. Brito, A. Buonanno, V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore,Gravitational-Wave Constraints on an Effective Field-Theory Extension of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 044056, [1912.09917]. – 41 –

    arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, P. Pichini, G. Travaglini and P. Vives Matasan,Spinning binary dynamics in cubic effective field theories of gravity,JHEP08(2024) 188, [2405.13826]

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Travaglini and P. Vives Matasan,Spinning quadrupoles in effective field theories of gravity,2412.17958

    arXiv

  30. [30]

    Liu and N

    H. Liu and N. Yunes,Robust and improved constraints on higher-curvature gravitational effective-field-theory with the GW170608 event,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 084049, [2407.08929]

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler,Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,Phys. Rev.108(1957) 1063–1069

    1957

  32. [32]

    F. J. Zerilli,Effective potential for even parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations,Phys. Rev. Lett.24(1970) 737–738

    1970

  33. [33]

    N. Sago, H. Nakano and M. Sasaki,Gauge problem in the gravitational selfforce. 1. Harmonic gauge approach in the Schwarzschild background,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 104017, [gr-qc/0208060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  34. [34]

    Nakano, N

    H. Nakano, N. Sago and M. Sasaki,Gauge problem in the gravitational selfforce. 2. First postNewtonian force under Regge-Wheeler gauge,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 124003, [gr-qc/0308027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  35. [35]

    S. A. Teukolsky,Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 1114–1118

    1972

  36. [36]

    Poisson,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole

    E. Poisson,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. 1: Analytical results for the nonrotating case,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1497–1510

    1993

  37. [37]

    Cutler, E

    C. Cutler, E. Poisson, G. J. Sussman and L. S. Finn,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. 2: Numerical results for the nonrotating case,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 1511–1518

    1993

  38. [38]

    Tagoshi and T

    H. Tagoshi and T. Nakamura,Gravitational waves from a point particle in circular orbit around a black hole: Logarithmic terms in the postNewtonian expansion,Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 4016–4022

    1994

  39. [39]

    Sasaki,PostNewtonian expansion of the ingoing wave Regge-Wheeler function,Prog

    M. Sasaki,PostNewtonian expansion of the ingoing wave Regge-Wheeler function,Prog. Theor. Phys.92(1994) 17–36, [gr-qc/9402042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  40. [40]

    Tagoshi and M

    H. Tagoshi and M. Sasaki,PostNewtonian expansion of gravitational waves from a particle in circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole,Prog. Theor. Phys.92(1994) 745–772, [gr-qc/9405062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  41. [41]

    Shibata, M

    M. Shibata, M. Sasaki, H. Tagoshi and T. Tanaka,Gravitational waves from a particle orbiting around a rotating black hole: PostNewtonian expansion,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 1646–1663, [gr-qc/9409054]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  42. [42]

    Poisson,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole

    E. Poisson,Gravitational radiation from a particle in circular orbit around a black hole. 6. Accuracy of the postNewtonian expansion,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 5719–5723, [gr-qc/9505030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  43. [43]

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi,Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,Prog. Theor. Phys.95(1996) 1079–1096, [gr-qc/9603020]. – 42 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  44. [44]

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, M. Shibata, H. Tagoshi and T. Tanaka,Black hole perturbation: Chapter 1,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.128(1997) 1–121, [gr-qc/9712057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  45. [45]

    Fucito and J

    F. Fucito and J. F. Morales,Post Newtonian emission of gravitational waves from binary systems: a gauge theory perspective,JHEP03(2024) 106, [2311.14637]

    arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Cipriani, G

    A. Cipriani, G. Di Russo, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian, Resumming post-Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational waveform expansions, SciPost Phys.19(2025) 057, [2501.19257]

    arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Aminov, A

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi and Y. Hatsuda,Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg-Witten Theory,2006.06111

    arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales,QNMs of branes, BHs and fuzzballs from Quantum SW geometries,2105.04245

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales,More on the SW-QNM correspondence, JHEP01(2022) 024, [2109.09804]

    arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig and A. Tanzini,Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 044047, [2105.04483]

    arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig and A. Tanzini,Irregular Liouville correlators and connection formulae for Heun functions,2201.04491

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    Consoli, F

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Poghossian,CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses,JHEP12(2022) 115, [2206.09437]

    arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini and Z. Zhou,Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 084071, [2312.05965]

    arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Aminov, P

    G. Aminov, P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli, A. Grassi and A. Tanzini,Black hole perturbation theory and multiple polylogarithms,2307.10141

    arXiv

  55. [55]

    Bianchi, G

    M. Bianchi, G. Dibitetto and J. F. Morales,Gauge theory meets cosmology,JCAP12(2024) 040, [2408.03243]

    arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Fucito, J

    F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Russo,Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from supersymmetric gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 044054, [2408.07329]

    arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Cipriani, F

    A. Cipriani, F. Fucito, C. Heissenberg, J. F. Morales and R. Russo,”Waveforms” at the Horizon,2602.05766

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    de Rham, J

    C. de Rham, J. Francfort and J. Zhang,Black Hole Gravitational Waves in the Effective Field Theory of Gravity,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 024079, [2005.13923]

    arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    C. T. Cunningham, R. H. Price and V. Moncrief,Radiation from collapsing relativistic stars. I - Linearized odd-parity radiation,Astrophys. J.224(1978) 643

    1978

  60. [60]

    F. J. Zerilli,Perturbation analysis for gravitational and electromagnetic radiation in a reissner-nordstroem geometry,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 860–868

    1974

  61. [61]

    D. Bini, G. Carvalho and A. Geralico,Scalar field self-force effects on a particle orbiting a Reissner-Nordström black hole,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 124028, [1610.02235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes

    S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes. 1985. – 43 –

    1985

  63. [63]

    Martel and E

    K. Martel and E. Poisson,Gravitational perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: A Practical covariant and gauge-invariant formalism,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 104003, [gr-qc/0502028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  64. [64]

    Fujita,Gravitational Waves from a Particle in Circular Orbits around a Schwarzschild Black Hole to the 22nd Post-Newtonian Order,Prog

    R. Fujita,Gravitational Waves from a Particle in Circular Orbits around a Schwarzschild Black Hole to the 22nd Post-Newtonian Order,Prog. Theor. Phys.128(2012) 971–992, [1211.5535]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Bernard, S

    L. Bernard, S. Giri, L. Lehner and R. Sturani,Generic EFT-motivated beyond general relativity gravitational wave tests and their curvature dependence: From observation to interpretation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 124013, [2507.17143]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    P. A. Cano, B. Ganchev, D. R. Mayerson and A. Ruipérez,Black hole multipoles in higher-derivative gravity,JHEP12(2022) 120, [2208.01044]

    arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    S. E. Gralla and R. M. Wald,A Rigorous Derivation of Gravitational Self-force,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 205009, [0806.3293]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  68. [68]

    de Rham and A

    C. de Rham and A. J. Tolley,Speed of gravity,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063518, [1909.00881]. – 44 –

    arXiv 2020