Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Extracting Unlearned Information from LLMs with Activation Steering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02631 v1 pith:ZN6VHYAA submitted 2024-11-04 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords informationsteeringactivationunlearnedllmsmodelsunlearningattacks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An unintended consequence of the vast pretraining of Large Language Models (LLMs) is the verbatim memorization of fragments of their training data, which may contain sensitive or copyrighted information. In recent years, unlearning has emerged as a solution to effectively remove sensitive knowledge from models after training. Yet, recent work has shown that supposedly deleted information can still be extracted by malicious actors through various attacks. Still, current attacks retrieve sets of possible candidate generations and are unable to pinpoint the output that contains the actual target information. We propose activation steering as a method for exact information retrieval from unlearned LLMs. We introduce a novel approach to generating steering vectors, named Anonymized Activation Steering. Additionally, we develop a simple word frequency method to pinpoint the correct answer among a set of candidates when retrieving unlearned information. Our evaluation across multiple unlearning techniques and datasets demonstrates that activation steering successfully recovers general knowledge (e.g., widely known fictional characters) while revealing limitations in retrieving specific information (e.g., details about non-public individuals). Overall, our results demonstrate that exact information retrieval from unlearned models is possible, highlighting a severe vulnerability of current unlearning techniques.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Safety Gap Toolkit: Evaluating Hidden Dangers of Open-Source Models

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On Llama-3 and Qwen-2.5, removing safety guardrails sharply raises compliance with dangerous bio, chem, and cyber requests, and the resulting safety gap grows with model scale.

Pith tools