Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Physically Grounded Vision-Language Models for Robotic Manipulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.02561 v4 pith:ZOZTGEE4 submitted 2023-09-05 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CV

Physically Grounded Vision-Language Models for Robotic Manipulation

classification cs.RO cs.AIcs.CV
keywords physicalconceptsgroundedphysicallyroboticmanipulationmodelsobjects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have led to improved performance on tasks such as visual question answering and image captioning. Consequently, these models are now well-positioned to reason about the physical world, particularly within domains such as robotic manipulation. However, current VLMs are limited in their understanding of the physical concepts (e.g., material, fragility) of common objects, which restricts their usefulness for robotic manipulation tasks that involve interaction and physical reasoning about such objects. To address this limitation, we propose PhysObjects, an object-centric dataset of 39.6K crowd-sourced and 417K automated physical concept annotations of common household objects. We demonstrate that fine-tuning a VLM on PhysObjects improves its understanding of physical object concepts, including generalization to held-out concepts, by capturing human priors of these concepts from visual appearance. We incorporate this physically grounded VLM in an interactive framework with a large language model-based robotic planner, and show improved planning performance on tasks that require reasoning about physical object concepts, compared to baselines that do not leverage physically grounded VLMs. We additionally illustrate the benefits of our physically grounded VLM on a real robot, where it improves task success rates. We release our dataset and provide further details and visualizations of our results at https://iliad.stanford.edu/pg-vlm/.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Reasoning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulation

    cs.RO 2024-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    ReKep encodes robotic tasks as optimizable Python functions over 3D keypoints that are generated automatically from language and RGB-D input, enabling real-time hierarchical planning on single- and dual-arm platforms ...

  2. Vision Language Models Cannot Reason About Physical Transformation

    cs.AI 2026-03 accept novelty 6.5

    Current VLMs cannot maintain transformation-invariant representations of number, length, volume or size and instead rely on textual invariance priors that reverse on matched non-conserving controls.