REVIEW 2 cited by
Validity Learning on Failures: Mitigating the Distribution Shift in Autonomous Vehicle Planning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The planning problem constitutes a fundamental aspect of the autonomous driving framework. Recent strides in representation learning have empowered vehicles to comprehend their surrounding environments, thereby facilitating the integration of learning-based planning strategies. Among these approaches, Imitation Learning stands out due to its notable training efficiency. However, traditional Imitation Learning methodologies encounter challenges associated with the co-variate shift phenomenon. We propose Validity Learning on Failures, VL(on failure), as a remedy to address this issue. The essence of our method lies in deploying a pre-trained planner across diverse scenarios. Instances where the planner deviates from its immediate objectives, such as maintaining a safe distance from obstacles or adhering to traffic rules, are flagged as failures. The states corresponding to these failures are compiled into a new dataset, termed the failure dataset. Notably, the absence of expert annotations for this data precludes the applicability of standard imitation learning approaches. To facilitate learning from the closed-loop mistakes, we introduce the VL objective which aims to discern valid trajectories within the current environmental context. Experimental evaluations conducted on both reactive CARLA simulation and non-reactive log-replay simulations reveal substantial enhancements in closed-loop metrics such as \textit{Score, Progress}, and Success Rate, underscoring the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. Further evaluations against the Bench2Drive benchmark demonstrate that VL(on failure) outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ETA: Efficiency through Thinking Ahead, A Dual Approach to Self-Driving with Large Models
An asynchronous dual-system architecture forecasts large-model features into the current frame and adds a small-model update to drive in near real time, scoring 69.53 on Bench2Drive at 50 ms.
-
Generating Out-Of-Distribution Scenarios Using Language Models
The paper generates rare driving scenarios via an LLM-built tree, simulates them in CARLA, but its OOD-ness metric is interpreted in a way that contradicts its equation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.