Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey on Group Fairness in Federated Learning: Challenges, Taxonomy of Solutions and Directions for Future Research

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03855 v2 pith:ZPDQ5OOR submitted 2024-10-04 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fairnessgrouplearningfederatedresearchachievingacrossanalyze
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Group fairness in machine learning is an important area of research focused on achieving equitable outcomes across different groups defined by sensitive attributes such as race or gender. Federated Learning, a decentralized approach to training machine learning models across multiple clients, amplifies the need for fairness methodologies due to its inherent heterogeneous data distributions that can exacerbate biases. The intersection of Federated Learning and group fairness has attracted significant interest, with 48 research works specifically dedicated to addressing this issue. However, no comprehensive survey has specifically focused on group fairness in Federated Learning. In this work, we analyze the key challenges of this topic, propose practices for its identification and benchmarking, and create a novel taxonomy based on criteria such as data partitioning, location, and strategy. Furthermore, we analyze broader concerns, review how different approaches handle the complexities of various sensitive attributes, examine common datasets and applications, and discuss the ethical, legal, and policy implications of group fairness in FL. We conclude by highlighting key areas for future research, emphasizing the need for more methods to address the complexities of achieving group fairness in federated systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fairness in Federated Learning: Fairness for Whom?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A critical review of 121 federated learning fairness papers identifies five recurring pitfalls and proposes a harm-centered, lifecycle-based framework.

  2. Towards Group Fairness with Multiple Sensitive Attributes in Federated Foundation Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    EFF-DVP extends FF-DVP to multiple sensitive attributes with parallel demographic prompts and claims that larger causal effects of an attribute on the label predict smaller fairness improvements.

Pith tools