Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

SEEDS: Emulation of Weather Forecast Ensembles with Diffusion Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.14066 v3 pith:ZPOARR4E submitted 2023-06-24 cs.LG physics.ao-ph

SEEDS: Emulation of Weather Forecast Ensembles with Diffusion Models

classification cs.LG physics.ao-ph
keywords weatherensemblesforecastingforecastsclimateforecastmodelsuncertainty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Uncertainty quantification is crucial to decision-making. A prominent example is probabilistic forecasting in numerical weather prediction. The dominant approach to representing uncertainty in weather forecasting is to generate an ensemble of forecasts. This is done by running many physics-based simulations under different conditions, which is a computationally costly process. We propose to amortize the computational cost by emulating these forecasts with deep generative diffusion models learned from historical data. The learned models are highly scalable with respect to high-performance computing accelerators and can sample hundreds to tens of thousands of realistic weather forecasts at low cost. When designed to emulate operational ensemble forecasts, the generated ones are similar to physics-based ensembles in important statistical properties and predictive skill. When designed to correct biases present in the operational forecasting system, the generated ensembles show improved probabilistic forecast metrics. They are more reliable and forecast probabilities of extreme weather events more accurately. While this work demonstrates the utility of the methodology by focusing on weather forecasting, the generative artificial intelligence methodology can be extended for uncertainty quantification in climate modeling, where we believe the generation of very large ensembles of climate projections will play an increasingly important role in climate risk assessment.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geospatial Diffusion-based Evolution Synthesis (GeoDES) for Storm-Centered Weather Augmentation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    GeoDES generates realistic synthetic cyclone evolutions via 2D-pretrained, temporally-inflated diffusion with correlated noise, beating weather foundation models on storm-kinetics and energy-spectrum metrics.

  2. Mechanisms of Misgeneralization in Physical Sequence Modeling

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Generative sequence models for physical tasks exhibit physical misgeneralization where local prediction errors propagate through physical measurements to distort aggregate distributions over quantities like distance o...

  3. Earth System Foundation Model (ESFM): A unified framework for heterogeneous data integration and forecasting

    physics.ao-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ESFM is a single open foundation model that unifies heterogeneous Earth data sources and forecasts missing regions while preserving inter-variable physical relationships.

  4. Flow Learners for PDEs: Toward a Physics-to-Physics Paradigm for Scientific Computing

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Flow learners parameterize transport vector fields to generate PDE trajectories through integration, offering a physics-to-physics organizing principle for learned solvers.

  5. Flow Learners for PDEs: Toward a Physics-to-Physics Paradigm for Scientific Computing

    cs.LG 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Learned PDE solving should target transport over admissible futures via flow learners, not snapshot state regression.