Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mind the Error! Detection and Localization of Instruction Errors in Vision-and-Language Navigation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.10700 v2 pith:ZQHGHPB6 submitted 2024-03-15 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CL
keywords vln-cebenchmarkerrorsinstructionsdatasetdetectionerrorinstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environments (VLN-CE) is one of the most intuitive yet challenging embodied AI tasks. Agents are tasked to navigate towards a target goal by executing a set of low-level actions, following a series of natural language instructions. All VLN-CE methods in the literature assume that language instructions are exact. However, in practice, instructions given by humans can contain errors when describing a spatial environment due to inaccurate memory or confusion. Current VLN-CE benchmarks do not address this scenario, making the state-of-the-art methods in VLN-CE fragile in the presence of erroneous instructions from human users. For the first time, we propose a novel benchmark dataset that introduces various types of instruction errors considering potential human causes. This benchmark provides valuable insight into the robustness of VLN systems in continuous environments. We observe a noticeable performance drop (up to -25%) in Success Rate when evaluating the state-of-the-art VLN-CE methods on our benchmark. Moreover, we formally define the task of Instruction Error Detection and Localization, and establish an evaluation protocol on top of our benchmark dataset. We also propose an effective method, based on a cross-modal transformer architecture, that achieves the best performance in error detection and localization, compared to baselines. Surprisingly, our proposed method has revealed errors in the validation set of the two commonly used datasets for VLN-CE, i.e., R2R-CE and RxR-CE, demonstrating the utility of our technique in other tasks. Code and dataset available at https://intelligolabs.github.io/R2RIE-CE

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NoisyEQA: Benchmarking Embodied Question Answering Against Noisy Queries

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    NoisyEQA benchmarks embodied QA agents against four noise types and claims a self-correcting prompt (NACoT) markedly improves noisy-question accuracy as scored by GPT-4.

Pith tools