pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.03531 · v2 · pith:ZRQ6P47Jnew · submitted 2019-07-08 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Notes on Tensor Models and Tensor Field Theories

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 01:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords tensor modelstensor field theories1/N expansionmelonic limitlarge N limitconformal field theoriesrandom tensorsSYK models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tensor models admit a 1/N expansion whose melonic large-N limit yields analytically tractable strongly coupled quantum field theories and a new class of conformal field theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The notes establish that tensor models and tensor field theories possess a 1/N expansion in which melonic diagrams dominate at large N. This limit is simpler than the planar diagrams of random matrices and richer than the large-N behavior of vector models. The resulting theories remain non-trivial yet solvable, supplying concrete examples of strongly coupled quantum field theories that can be studied analytically. These constructions also generate a new family of conformal field theories. The review presents both the classical details of the expansion and selected recent developments.

Core claim

Tensor models and tensor field theories admit a 1/N expansion and a melonic large N limit which is simpler than the planar limit of random matrices and richer than the large N limit of vector models. They provide examples of analytically tractable but non trivial strongly coupled quantum field theories and lead to a new class of conformal field theories.

What carries the argument

The melonic large N limit, in which only melonic diagrams survive the 1/N expansion of tensor models.

If this is right

  • The models furnish concrete, solvable instances of strongly coupled quantum field theories.
  • The same limit produces a new family of conformal field theories.
  • The 1/N expansion supplies a systematic way to compute observables order by order.
  • The framework covers both classical results on the expansion and recent extensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The melonic limit may serve as a bridge between tensor models and SYK-type models for further analytic study.
  • The same expansion technique could be tested in higher-rank or colored tensor models to check universality of the melonic sector.
  • If the limit remains solvable in the presence of interactions, it offers a route to controlled calculations in regimes where perturbation theory fails.

Load-bearing premise

Melonic diagrams dominate the large-N limit and the resulting theories stay well-defined and non-trivial after the expansion is taken.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in which a non-melonic diagram contributes at the same leading order in 1/N as the melonic ones would disprove dominance of the melonic sector.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.03531 by Razvan Gurau.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Schwinger Dyson equation. ... PSfrag replacements = G G G Σ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The melonic truncation of the self energy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The vertex and the propagator of the colored tensor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Rooted graphs. where the reduced degree ωˆ(G) of a graph G is a non negative half integer. The properties of the degree are discussed in detail in Appendix A. The two point function (and all the other correlation functions) admits a 1/N expansion indexed by the degree: G = X ωˆ∈N/2 N −ωˆ ωˆ( X G)=ˆω G∈G (−λ) V (G)C D+1 2 V (G)+1 . (3.8) At leading order one obtains only the graphs with ˆω(G) = 0. The graph… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Colored and stranded representation of the vertex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Vertices and edges of the CTKT model We denote Vt(G), Vp(G) and Vd(G) the numbers of tetrahedral, pillow and double trace vertices of a CTKT graph G, and F(G) the number of faces of G. The number of pillow vertices splits as the sum of the numbers of pillow vertices of each kind. The edges are not colored, but the faces are colored with a color 1, 2 or 3. Using the same trick as before, we can compute the … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The melon-tadpole self energy. In the melon-tadpole truncation one includes two graphs. The first one is a tadpole graph whose vertex is either a pillow or the double trace such that the edge closes the maximal number of faces. The second is a melon with two tetrahedral vertices. At leading order we have: (G LO) −1 = C −1 − Σ LO , Σ LO = −(λp + λd)G LO + λ 2 (G LO) 3 . (3.26) 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Graphs contributing to the 2PI action at first order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: On the left: a two particle reducible contribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The four point Dyson equation. The second derivative of Γ is related to the four point kernel: δ 2Γ δGabδGxy = 1 2 G −1 aa′G −1 bb′  S − K  a ′b ′ ;xy . (4.11) 15It is sometimes useful to give a formal functional integral formula for Γ: e −Γ[G] = e − 1 2 Tr[C−1G] Z 2P I [dφ] e − 1 2 φ·G−1φ−S int[φ] . 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: On the left the correlation function hφx1 φx2Oµ¯;xi G;ǫ 2P I . On the right a contri￾bution which is two particle reducible in the channel (φφ) → O. The red dot represents the composite operator. The last correlation hφx1φx2Oµ¯;xi G;ǫ 2P I is represented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The bare series up to quartic order (the blue verti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Ladders, caps and double caps. Let us denote Ur, Sr, Tr the amplitude of the ladder, cap respectively double cap with 2r tetrahedral vertices, and let us define the generating functions: U(˜g) = X r≥1 g˜ 2rUr , S(˜g) = X r≥1 g˜ 2rSr , T(˜g) = X r≥0 g˜ 2rTr , (5.20) 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Bare and renormalized tetrahedral couplings (in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Flows in the (g1, g2) plane in the case of imaginary tetrahedral coupling. Comparison with ζ = 1, d = 4 − ǫ. The case ˜g real is very similar to the Wilson-Fisher like fixed point discussed in Eq. (5.2). In d = 4 − ǫ the tetrahedral coupling is not marginal (see Eq. (5.2)), but has a flow driven by the wave function. The flow has a fixed point for a real value of the tetrahedral coupling. The key point is… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Examples of ribbon graphs with 4 vertices, 6 edges [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Deletion of an edge. Let us delete iteratively a maximal set of edges in a connected graph such that at each step the edge we delete separates two different faces. This can not disconnect the graph. The number of edges deleted is F(G)−1. The remaining edges connect all the vertices, hence there are at least V (G) − 1 of them. It follows that the non orientable genus of a connected ribbon graph is a non ne… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: A triangle with twisted edges in a ribbon graph. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Melonic graphs at first orders Proposition 4. For D ≥ 3, a connected edge (D + 1)–colored graph G has reduced degree zero if and only if it is melonic. Proof. As the insertion of two vertices connected by D parallel edges brings D 2  new faces, it does not change the degree. It follows that melonic graphs have degree zero. For the converse statement, we proceed by induction on the number of vertices. The… view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Vertices and edges of the CTKT model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Resolution of the pillow and double trace vertice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: A melon-tadpole graph. Proposition 7. A CT KT graph has reduced degree zero if and only if it is a melon-tadpole graph. Proof. As ω(G) = ω(G˜), this comes to proving that G˜ has zero degree if and only if it is melonic. The proof follows the one of Proposition 4, but with some twists. The main difference is that faces can now have odd length. Assume that the connected graph G˜ with only tetrahedral vertic… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: The 1PI decomposition of a graph. These graphs can always be decomposed along one particle irreducibly edges (that is edges that, when cut, disconnect the graph), as depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_23.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Tensor models and tensor field theories admit a $1/N$ expansion and a melonic large $N$ limit which is simpler than the planar limit of random matrices and richer than the large $N$ limit of vector models. They provide examples of analytically tractable but non trivial strongly coupled quantum field theories and lead to a new class of conformal field theories. We present a compact introduction to the topic, covering both some of the classical results in the field, like the details of the $1/N$ expansion, as well as recent developments. These notes are loosely bases on four lectures given at the Journ\'ees de physique math\'ematique Lyon 2019: Random tensors and SYK models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript consists of lecture notes summarizing tensor models and tensor field theories. It states that these models admit a 1/N expansion whose melonic large-N limit is simpler than the planar limit of random matrices and richer than the large-N limit of vector models, yielding analytically tractable yet non-trivial strongly coupled QFTs and a new class of CFTs. The notes cover classical results on the 1/N expansion together with recent developments and are based on four lectures given at Journées de physique mathématique Lyon 2019.

Significance. The notes supply a compact, pedagogical overview of an established body of results on melonic dominance. By correctly positioning the tensor-model large-N limit as intermediate between vector and matrix models, the manuscript offers a useful entry point for researchers studying solvable strongly coupled theories and their conformal fixed points.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the clause 'These notes are loosely bases on four lectures' contains a grammatical error ('bases' should read 'based').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our lecture notes and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; introductory notes on established results

full rationale

This document consists of lecture notes summarizing classical and recent results on the 1/N expansion and melonic large-N limit in tensor models, without presenting any new derivation chain or first-principles claims. All central statements are explicitly framed as known facts from the literature rather than derived within the text, so no load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, fitted input, or self-citation chain. The presupposition of melonic dominance is treated as the standard result in the field and is not introduced as a novel assumption here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an expository review paper; it introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities of its own.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5636 in / 1007 out tokens · 17325 ms · 2026-05-25T01:22:17.954672+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · 72 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory and critical phenomena

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory and critical phenomena . Clarendon Press, 1996

  2. [2]

    Weinberg, A model of leptons , Phys

    S. Weinberg, A model of leptons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264–1266

  3. [3]

    Salam, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions , Conf

    A. Salam, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions , Conf. Proc. C680519 (1968) 367–377

  4. [4]

    S. L. Glashow, Partial symmetries of weak interactions , Nucl. Phys. 22 (1961) 579–588

  5. [5]

    Fritzsch and M

    H. Fritzsch and M. Gell-Mann, eds., 50 years of quarks . World Scientific, Hackensack, 2015

  6. [6]

    Ising, Contribution to the Theory of Ferromagnetism , Z

    E. Ising, Contribution to the Theory of Ferromagnetism , Z. Phys. 31 (1925) 253–258

  7. [7]

    Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems

    W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden and K. Sc honhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion syst ems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 299 [ arXiv:1105.5289]

  8. [8]

    K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher, Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 240–243

  9. [9]

    K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion , Phys. Rept. 12 (1974) 75–199

  10. [10]

    Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians , Nucl

    J. Polchinski, Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians , Nucl. Phys. B231 (1984) 269–295

  11. [11]

    Glimm and A

    J. Glimm and A. Jaffe, Quantum physics. A functional integral point of view . Springer, New York, 1987

  12. [12]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory . Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

  13. [13]

    Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simm ons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 025022 [arXiv:1203.6064]

  14. [14]

    Quantum Field Theory in the Large N Limit: a review

    M. Moshe and J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory in the large N limit: A Review , Phys. Rept. 385 (2003) 69–228 [ arXiv:hep-th/0306133]

  15. [15]

    ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions , Nucl. Phys. B72 (1974) 461

  16. [16]

    2D Gravity and Random Matrices

    P. Di Francesco, P. H. Ginsparg and J. Zinn-Justin, 2 − D Gravity and random matrices , Phys. Rept. 254 (1995) 1–133 [ arXiv:hep-th/9306153]

  17. [17]

    Gurau, Random Tensors

    R. Gurau, Random Tensors. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016

  18. [18]

    Analyticity results for the cumulants in a random matrix model

    R. Gurau and T. Krajewski, Analyticity results for the cumulants in a random matrix model, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Comb. Phys. Interact. 2 (2014) 169–228 [arXiv:1409.1705]

  19. [19]

    The 1/N Expansion of Tensor Models Beyond Perturbation Theory

    R. Gurau, The 1/N expansion of tensor models beyond perturbation theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 330 (2014) 973–1019 [ arXiv:1304.2666]. 44

  20. [20]

    Constructive Matrix Theory for Higher Order Interaction

    T. Krajewski, V. Rivasseau and V. Sazonov, Constructive Matrix Theory for Higher Order Interaction, arXiv:1712.05670

  21. [21]

    Brezin and V

    E. Brezin and V. A. Kazakov, Exactly solvable field theories of closed strings , Phys. Lett. B236 (1990) 144–150

  22. [22]

    M. R. Douglas and S. H. Shenker, Strings in less than one-dimension , Nucl. Phys. B335 (1990) 635

  23. [23]

    D. J. Gross and A. A. Migdal, Nonperturbative two-dimensional quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 127

  24. [24]

    Double Scaling in Tensor Models with a Quartic Interaction

    S. Dartois, R. Gurau and V. Rivasseau, Double scaling in tensor models with a quartic interaction, JHEP 1309 (2013) 088 [ arXiv:1307.5281]

  25. [25]

    Regular colored graphs of positive degree

    R. Gurau and G. Schaeffer, Regular colored graphs of positive degree , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Comb. Phys. Interact.3 (2016) 257–320 [ arXiv:1307.5279]

  26. [26]

    The double scaling limit of random tensor models

    V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, J. P. Ryan and A. Tanasa, The double scaling limit of random tensor models, JHEP 1409 (2014) 051 [ arXiv:1404.7517]

  27. [27]

    The double scaling limit of the multi-orientable tensor model

    R. Gurau, A. Tanasa and D. R. Youmans, The double scaling limit of the multi-orientable tensor model, Europhys. Lett. 111 (2015), no. 2 21002 [ arXiv:1505.00586]

  28. [28]

    Constructive tensor field theory: The $T^{4}_{4}$ model

    V. Rivasseau and F. Vignes-Tourneret, Constructive Tensor Field Theory: The T 4 4 Model, Commun. Math. Phys. 366 (2019), no. 2 567–646 [ arXiv:1703.06510]

  29. [29]

    T. H. Berlin and M. Kac, The Spherical Model of a Ferromagnet , Phys. Rev. 86 (1952) 821–835

  30. [30]

    H. E. Stanley, Spherical model as the limit of infinite spin dimensionality , Phys. Rev. 176 (1968) 718–722

  31. [31]

    Introduction to Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory

    J. Berges, Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory , AIP Conf. Proc. 739 (2005) 3–62 [ arXiv:hep-ph/0409233]. [,3(2004)]

  32. [32]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model , Phys. Lett. B550 (2002) 213–219 [ arXiv:hep-th/0210114]

  33. [33]

    M. A. Vasiliev, Higher spin gauge theories: Star product and AdS space , arXiv:hep-th/9910096

  34. [34]

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, Cubic Interaction in Extended Theories of Massless Higher Spin Fields , Nucl. Phys. B291 (1987) 141–171

  35. [35]

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, On the Gravitational Interaction of Massless Higher Spin Fields, Phys. Lett. B189 (1987) 89–95

  36. [36]

    Critical Exponents of the N-vector model

    R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, Critical exponents of the N vector model , J. Phys. A31 (1998) 8103–8121 [ arXiv:cond-mat/9803240]

  37. [37]

    Brezin, C

    E. Brezin, C. Itzykson, G. Parisi and J. B. Zuber, Planar diagrams, Commun. Math. Phys. 59 (1978) 35. 45

  38. [38]

    I. R. Klebanov, F. Popov and G. Tarnopolsky, TASI Lectures on Large N Tensor Models, PoS T ASI2017(2018) 004 [ arXiv:1808.09434]

  39. [39]

    Critical behavior of colored tensor models in the large N limit

    V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, A. Riello and V. Rivasseau, Critical behavior of colored tensor models in the large N limit, Nucl. Phys. B853 (2011) 174–195 [ arXiv:1105.3122]

  40. [40]

    Ferrari, The Large D Limit of Planar Diagrams , arXiv:1701.01171

    F. Ferrari, The Large D Limit of Planar Diagrams , arXiv:1701.01171

  41. [41]

    Phase Diagram of Planar Matrix Quantum Mechanics, Tensor, and Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Models

    T. Azeyanagi, F. Ferrari and F. I. Schaposnik Massolo, Phase Diagram of Planar Matrix Quantum Mechanics, Tensor, and Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Models , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 6 061602 [ arXiv:1707.03431]

  42. [42]

    A New Large N Expansion for General Matrix-Tensor Models

    F. Ferrari, V. Rivasseau and G. Valette, A New Large N Expansion for General Matrix-Tensor Models, arXiv:1709.07366

  43. [43]

    More on the New Large $D$ Limit of Matrix Models

    T. Azeyanagi, F. Ferrari, P. Gregori, L. Leduc and G. Val ette, More on the New Large D Limit of Matrix Models , Annals Phys. 393 (2018) 308–326 [ arXiv:1710.07263]

  44. [44]

    Ambjorn, B

    J. Ambjorn, B. Durhuus and T. Jonsson, Three-dimensional simplicial quantum gravity and generalized matrix models , Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 1133–1146

  45. [45]

    Sasakura, Tensor model for gravity and orientability of manifold , Mod

    N. Sasakura, Tensor model for gravity and orientability of manifold , Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 2613–2624

  46. [46]

    Colored Group Field Theory

    R. Gurau, Colored Group Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 304 (2011) 69–93 [arXiv:0907.2582]

  47. [47]

    Colored Tensor Models - a Review

    R. Gurau and J. P. Ryan, Colored tensor models - a review , SIGMA 8 (2012) 020 [arXiv:1109.4812]

  48. [48]

    A Renormalizable 4-Dimensional Tensor Field Theory

    J. Ben Geloun and V. Rivasseau, A renormalizable 4-Dimensional tensor field theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 318 (2013) 69–109 [ arXiv:1111.4997]

  49. [49]

    D. O. Samary, C. I. P´ erez-S´ anchez, F. Vignes-Tourneret and R. Wulkenhaar, Correlation functions of just renormalizable tensorial group field theo ry: The melonic approximation , arXiv:1411.7213

  50. [50]

    Pascalie, C

    R. Pascalie, C. I. P´ erez-S´ anchez, A. Tanasa and R. Wulkenhaar, On the large N limit of the Schwinger-Dyson equation of tensor field theory , arXiv:1810.09867

  51. [51]

    An SYK-Like Model Without Disorder

    E. Witten, An SYK-Like Model Without Disorder , arXiv:1610.09758

  52. [52]

    The complete $1/N$ expansion of a SYK--like tensor model

    R. Gurau, The complete 1/N expansion of a SYK–like tensor model , Nucl. Phys. B916 (2017) 386–401 [ arXiv:1611.04032]

  53. [53]

    I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, Uncolored Random Tensors, Melon Diagrams, and the SYK Models, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 4 046004 [ arXiv:1611.08915]

  54. [54]

    C. Peng, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich, A Supersymmetric SYK-like Tensor Model , JHEP 05 (2017) 062 [ arXiv:1612.03851]

  55. [55]

    Quantum Chaos and Holographic Tensor Models

    C. Krishnan, S. Sanyal and P. N. Bala Subramanian, Quantum Chaos and Holographic Tensor Models, JHEP 03 (2017) 056 [ arXiv:1612.06330]. 46

  56. [56]

    Contrasting SYK-like Models

    C. Krishnan, K. V. P. Kumar and D. Rosa, Contrasting SYK-like Models , arXiv:1709.06498

  57. [57]

    Spectra of Operators in Large $N$ Tensor Models

    K. Bulycheva, I. R. Klebanov, A. Milekhin and G. Tarnopo lsky, Spectra of Operators in LargeN Tensor Models, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 2 026016 [ arXiv:1707.09347]

  58. [58]

    Notes on Melonic $O(N)^{q-1}$ Tensor Models

    S. Choudhury, A. Dey, I. Halder, L. Janagal, S. Minwalla and R. Poojary, Notes on melonic O(N )q− 1 tensor models, JHEP 06 (2018) 094 [ arXiv:1707.09352]

  59. [59]

    Spectrum of Majorana Quantum Mechanics with $O(4)^3$ Symmetry

    K. Pakrouski, I. R. Klebanov, F. Popov and G. Tarnopolsk y, Spectrum of Majorana Quantum Mechanics with O(4)3 Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019), no. 1 011601 [arXiv:1808.07455]

  60. [60]

    I. R. Klebanov, A. Milekhin, F. Popov and G. Tarnopolsky , Spectra of eigenstates in fermionic tensor quantum mechanics , Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 10 106023 [arXiv:1802.10263]

  61. [61]

    J. Kim, I. R. Klebanov, G. Tarnopolsky and W. Zhao, Symmetry Breaking in Coupled SYK or Tensor Models , arXiv:1902.02287

  62. [62]

    SYK-like tensor quantum mechanics with $\mathrm{Sp}(N)$ symmetry

    S. Carrozza and V. Pozsgay, SYK-like tensor quantum mechanics with Sp(N ) symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B941 (2019) 28–52 [ arXiv:1809.07753]

  63. [63]

    I. R. Klebanov, P. N. Pallegar and F. K. Popov, Majorana Fermion Quantum Mechanics for Higher Rank Tensors , arXiv:1905.06264

  64. [64]

    Gapless Spin-Fluid Ground State in a Random Quantum Heisenberg Magnet

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenbe rg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339 [ arXiv:cond-mat/9212030]

  65. [65]

    Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography , KITP strings seminar and Entanglement 2015 (Feb

    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography , KITP strings seminar and Entanglement 2015 (Feb. 12, April 7, and May 27, 2015)

  66. [66]

    Comments on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 10 106002 [ arXiv:1604.07818]

  67. [67]

    The Spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model

    J. Polchinski and V. Rosenhaus, The Spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model , JHEP 04 (2016) 001 [ arXiv:1601.06768]

  68. [68]

    D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, A Generalization of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev , JHEP 02 (2017) 093 [ arXiv:1610.01569]

  69. [69]

    D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, All point correlation functions in SYK , JHEP 12 (2017) 148 [ arXiv:1710.08113]

  70. [70]

    D. J. Gross and V. Rosenhaus, The Bulk Dual of SYK: Cubic Couplings , JHEP 05 (2017) 092 [ arXiv:1702.08016]

  71. [71]

    Phases Of Melonic Quantum Mechanics

    F. Ferrari and F. I. Schaposnik Massolo, Phases Of Melonic Quantum Mechanics , arXiv:1903.06633

  72. [72]

    Towards a Finite-$N$ Hologram

    C. Krishnan and K. V. P. Kumar, Towards a Finite-N Hologram, JHEP 10 (2017) 099 [arXiv:1706.05364]

  73. [73]

    Exact Solution of a Strongly Coupled Gauge Theory in 0+1 Dimensions

    C. Krishnan and K. V. Pavan Kumar, Exact Solution of a Strongly Coupled Gauge Theory in 0+1 Dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 20 201603 [ arXiv:1802.02502]. 47

  74. [74]

    Bosonic Tensor Models at Large $N$ and Small $\epsilon$

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, Bosonic tensor models at large N and small ǫ, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 10 106014 [ arXiv:1707.03866]

  75. [75]

    A Complex Fermionic Tensor Model in $d$ Dimensions

    S. Prakash and R. Sinha, A Complex Fermionic Tensor Model in d Dimensions, JHEP 02 (2018) 086 [ arXiv:1710.09357]

  76. [76]

    Tensorial Gross-Neveu models

    D. Benedetti, S. Carrozza, R. Gurau and A. Sfondrini, Tensorial Gross-Neveu models , JHEP 01 (2018) 003 [ arXiv:1710.10253]

  77. [77]

    Giombi, I

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, F. Popov, S. Prakash and G. Tar nopolsky, Prismatic Large N Models for Bosonic Tensors , Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 10 105005 [ arXiv:1808.04344]

  78. [78]

    Phase diagram and fixed points of tensorial Gross-Neveu models in three dimensions

    D. Benedetti and N. Delporte, Phase diagram and fixed points of tensorial Gross-Neveu models in three dimensions , JHEP 01 (2019) 218 [ arXiv:1810.04583]

  79. [79]

    F. K. Popov, Supersymmetric Tensor Model at Large N and Small ǫ, arXiv:1907.02440

  80. [80]

    J. Liu, E. Perlmutter, V. Rosenhaus and D. Simmons-Duffin ,d-dimensional SYK, AdS Loops, and 6j Symbols, JHEP 03 (2019) 052 [ arXiv:1808.00612]

Showing first 80 references.