Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.05035 v1 pith:ZSTGOBZW submitted 2025-06-05 cs.LG cs.AI

TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords seriestimetimingpointsassessattributionconventionalevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods for time series primarily estimate point-wise attribution magnitudes, while overlooking the directional impact on predictions, leading to suboptimal identification of significant points. Our analysis shows that conventional Integrated Gradients (IG) effectively capture critical points with both positive and negative impacts on predictions. However, current evaluation metrics fail to assess this capability, as they inadvertently cancel out opposing feature contributions. To address this limitation, we propose novel evaluation metrics-Cumulative Prediction Difference (CPD) and Cumulative Prediction Preservation (CPP)-to systematically assess whether attribution methods accurately identify significant positive and negative points in time series XAI. Under these metrics, conventional IG outperforms recent counterparts. However, directly applying IG to time series data may lead to suboptimal outcomes, as generated paths ignore temporal relationships and introduce out-of-distribution samples. To overcome these challenges, we introduce TIMING, which enhances IG by incorporating temporal awareness while maintaining its theoretical properties. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world time series benchmarks demonstrate that TIMING outperforms existing time series XAI baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/drumpt/TIMING.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TimeSAE: Causal Sparse Decoding for Faithful Explanations of Black-Box Time Series Models

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    TimeSAE trains a sparse autoencoder with counterfactual and consistency losses to explain black-box time series predictions, claiming better faithfulness and out-of-distribution robustness than eight baselines.

  2. Attribution and Uncertainty Behavior of Learned Residual Gyro Correction for Gyro-Stellar Estimation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    In learned residual gyro correction, ensemble epistemic uncertainty separates nominal from structured sensor perturbations more clearly than heteroscedastic aleatoric uncertainty, while attributions stay gyro-dominate...