Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The two-way knowledge interaction interface between humans and neural networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.05461 v1 pith:ZVFKDVHV submitted 2024-01-10 cs.HC cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.LG
keywords humansknowledgeinteractioninterfacereasoningc-scgconceptsdirect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite neural networks (NN) have been widely applied in various fields and generally outperforms humans, they still lack interpretability to a certain extent, and humans are unable to intuitively understand the decision logic of NN. This also hinders the knowledge interaction between humans and NN, preventing humans from getting involved to give direct guidance when NN's decisions go wrong. While recent research in explainable AI has achieved interpretability of NN from various perspectives, it has not yet provided effective methods for knowledge exchange between humans and NN. To address this problem, we constructed a two-way interaction interface that uses structured representations of visual concepts and their relationships as the "language" for knowledge exchange between humans and NN. Specifically, NN provide intuitive reasoning explanations to humans based on the class-specific structural concepts graph (C-SCG). On the other hand, humans can modify the biases present in the C-SCG through their prior knowledge and reasoning ability, and thus provide direct knowledge guidance to NN through this interface. Through experimental validation, based on this interaction interface, NN can provide humans with easily understandable explanations of the reasoning process. Furthermore, human involvement and prior knowledge can directly and effectively contribute to enhancing the performance of NN.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Discovery Engine: A Framework for AI-Driven Synthesis and Navigation of Scientific Knowledge Landscapes

    cond-mat.soft 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The Discovery Engine is a proposed AI framework for distilling entire scientific literatures into a 'Conceptual Tensor' and knowledge graph to enable automated gap analysis and hypothesis generation.

Pith tools