Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The paper argues that the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in the d→2 limit contains the Ising CFT only as a subsector, because Virasoro symmetry forces extra operators that must cancel out of Ising correlation functions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 07:31 UTC pith:ZWT2WRGZ

load-bearing objection A real paradox, an exact toy model where the proposed resolution works, and a plausible but unproven scenario for the Wilson-Fisher fixed point itself. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.19977 v3 pith:ZWT2WRGZ submitted 2026-01-27 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mech

On the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in the limit of integer spacetime dimensions

Bernardo Zan This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Wilson-Fisher fixed pointIsing modelconformal field theoryVirasoro symmetrynegative multiplicity representationsepsilon expansionO(n) modelmultiplet recombination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the common identification of the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in d=2 with the Ising conformal field theory cannot hold as a full equivalence. The reason is Virasoro symmetry: in two dimensions the Ising CFT has infinitely many conserved currents, and analytically continuing the Wilson-Fisher theory to d→2 forces descendant operators, such as a spin-3 operator of dimension 5, that simply do not exist in the Ising spectrum. The proposed resolution is that the Ising model appears only as a unitary subsector of the limiting theory, while the full Wilson-Fisher spectrum contains additional operators that cancel out of Ising correlation functions. Support comes from the exactly solvable two-dimensional O(n) model, whose n→1 limit reproduces Ising correlators while retaining a larger set of observables, including operators with zero or negative multiplicity. If correct, this changes what one can learn about the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in d=2+ε from exact two-dimensional or three-dimensional Ising data.

Core claim

The central discovery is a consistency puzzle and its proposed mechanism. Literal equality between the d→2 Wilson-Fisher fixed point and the 2d Ising CFT fails because multiplet recombination near d=2 would leave behind a global primary W with Δ=5 and spin ℓ=3 (and analogues at higher spin), an operator absent from the Ising spectrum. The paper proposes that W and its relatives are canceled by operators transforming in O(d) representations whose multiplicities become negative at d=2, such as the (2,2) and (3,2) Young tableaux, so that Ising correlators emerge from cancellations between non-Ising operators. This scenario is modeled explicitly in the 2d O(n) CFT, where the n→1 limit has an exa

What carries the argument

The argument runs on multiplet recombination: as d→2, a conserved current of the two-dimensional Virasoro short multiplet must recombine into a long multiplet for d>2, forcing a descendant W of dimension 5 and spin 3 to become an independent operator. To remove W from the Ising subsector, the paper invokes operators in O(d) representations with negative multiplicity at integer d, computed from Young-tableau dimension formulas: for example, the (2,2) representation has multiplicity −2 at d=2, and (k,2) representations give −2 for all allowed k. In the toy O(n) model, analogous zero- or negative-multiplicity operators have nonvanishing correlators with the energy operator in the n→1 limit but

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the assumption that Wilson-Fisher operators in O(d) representations with negative multiplicity at d=2 genuinely exist for non-integer d and acquire scaling dimensions that exactly match the unwanted operators such as the spin-3 W (Δ=5) at d=2; the paper's one-loop check gives Δ≈5.56 for the lightest (2,2) operator, so the exact match is not yet demonstrated.

What would settle it

Compute the scaling dimension of the lightest Z2-even operator in the (2,2) representation of O(d) to sufficiently high order in the 4−ε expansion and evaluate at d=2. If its limit is not 5 (or, for the (3,2) candidate, does not match the other unwanted operators' dimensions), the proposed cancellation fails. Alternatively, compute a four-point function with four spin-2 operators at d=2+ε and check whether the W exchange is canceled by the negative-multiplicity operator.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The exact conformal data of the 2d Ising model cannot by itself determine the Wilson-Fisher CFT at d=2+ε; new operators enter with O(1) OPE coefficients.
  • Integer-dimension limits of Wilson-Fisher contain extra non-Ising operators, so matching the lightest scaling dimensions with Ising exponents is necessary but not sufficient evidence of full equivalence.
  • The same negative-multiplicity cancellation mechanism is predicted to operate at d→3, with extra operators associated with three-row Young tableaux dropping out of the 3d Ising subsector.
  • If the (2,2) or (3,2) operator dimension flows to exactly 5 at d=2, correlation functions of four spin-2 operators (or two spin-2 with spin-3 operators) should show the cancellation explicitly.
  • Attempts to continue Ising data from d=2 or d=3 via numerical bootstrap must account for non-Ising operators, consistent with the absence of a successful d=2+ε bootstrap.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper is right, the full d→2 Wilson-Fisher limit is likely a non-unitary logarithmic CFT whose Ising subsector is the unitary physical theory; the V/Y pairing in the O(n) model suggests that logarithmic multiplets also form at d=2.
  • A natural extension is that any conformal bootstrap in fractional dimensions that assumes unitarity is effectively probing only the unitary subsector, which may explain observed decoupling or level repulsion near d=2 in spinful correlators.
  • The scenario predicts that at d=2+ε the spectrum contains operators with no analogue in the d=2 Ising spectrum whose dimensions are tied to negative-multiplicity partners; these could be searched for in large-N or epsilon-expansion data.
  • One could test the toy-model analogy in the O(n) Wilson-Fisher fixed point at n→1 rather than d→2, using the same O(n)-representation negativity mechanism as a second perturbatively controlled laboratory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the standard identification of the Wilson-Fisher (WF) fixed point at integer dimensions with the critical Ising CFT. It argues that in the d→2 limit a literal equality is incompatible with the emergence of Virasoro symmetry: the spin-4 operator T4 would need to recombine with a spin-3, Δ=5 operator W that is absent from the 2d Ising spectrum. The proposed resolution is that the 2d Ising CFT arises only as a unitary subsector of the larger d→2 limit of WF, with non-Ising operators cancelling out in Ising correlators. The evidence is an exact toy model, the 2d O(n) CFT as n→1, where such cancellations are demonstrated at the level of OPE coefficients, and a preliminary one-loop analysis of operators in O(d) representations with negative multiplicity at d=2 (the (k,2) representations). The paper also draws consequences for attempts to construct a d=2+ε expansion from exact 2d data.

Significance. If the proposed scenario is correct, it resolves a genuine paradox and has substantial implications: the d→2 WF limit is larger than the 2d Ising CFT, and the exact Ising data alone cannot seed a d=2+ε bootstrap. The O(n) toy model is a strong piece of supporting evidence: the exact partition function and BPZ-based OPE coefficients show explicit cancellations between positive- and negative-multiplicity operators in the n→1 limit, and the non-factorization of correlators like ⟨εεJJ⟩ is a concrete existence proof of the mechanism. The statement of the paradox in Sec. 1.1 is clear and, under the stated analyticity assumption, logically sound. The weak point is the direct WF application: the negative-multiplicity operators are identified only through one-loop dimensions, and the required Δ=5, ℓ=3 cancellations are not demonstrated. Thus the paper is more convincing as a proposal with a solvable analogue than as a derivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.6), Table 1] The proposed cancellation of W requires an operator in a negative-multiplicity O(d) representation with scaling dimension exactly Δ=5 at d=2, and with the same quantum numbers and OPE couplings as W. The one-loop evidence does not provide this: the lightest (2,2) operator extrapolates to Δ≈5.56 (Eq. (3.6)), and the (3,2) candidates in Table 1 have Δ≈6.26 and 7.39. Calling these values 'the right ballpark' is not sufficient for an exact cancellation; higher orders would have to shift the dimension by a finite amount and land precisely on 5. In the O(n) toy model the cancellation is demonstrated at the level of OPE coefficients and four-point functions (Sec. 2.1.1, Appendix A), not just by comparing dimensions. No analogous computation is provided for the WF fixed point.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.3)] The paper identifies negative-multiplicity O(d) representations, but the cancellation with W (ℓ=3, Δ=5) requires the specific spin-3 component in the d→2 decomposition of, say, the (2,2) representation to have the right dimension and to couple to T4 with the right OPE coefficient. At d=2 an O(d) irrep with a Young tableau splits into infinitely many SO(2) spins; negative total multiplicity does not by itself locate a spin-3 operator. The paper states that such a cancellation 'should be observed in correlation functions' (Sec. 3.2) but no correlation function is computed. Without a direct check in ⟨TTTT⟩ or an analogous correlator, one cannot conclude that the negative-multiplicity operators decouple from the Ising subsector; they might equally fail to cancel W.
  3. [Sec. 1.1, assumption 2] The paradox and the proposed resolution both rely on the assumption that the conformal data of the WF fixed point is analytic in d for 2<d<4 and that the limit d→2 is taken through generic non-integer d. This is stated as an assumption, not proved. Since the O(n) toy model actually develops logarithmic behavior and non-factorized correlators at n→1, a reader could worry that WF similarly has non-analyticities that make the d→2 limit ambiguous. A concrete test would be to check for logarithmic terms or level splitting in the d→2 limit of the spin-4 multiplet; the paper should address this possibility explicitly, or at least state more carefully what would falsify the analyticity assumption.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.20)-(2.24)] The notation λ^2 for squared OPE coefficients and the squared coefficients C^2 in Eq. (2.24) could be defined more explicitly; the sign conventions for the imaginary values of λ_{εεε'} are not explained.
  2. [Table 1] The caption lists O(d) irreps but the rows are labeled by so(4) ≅ su(2)×su(2) representations. Clarify the mapping between these labels and the O(d) Young tableaux used in the text, especially for the (2,2) and (3,2) cases.
  3. [Sec. 2.1.1] The inequalities in Eqs. (2.15) and (2.17) use correlators of the form ⟨εεJJ⟩; the right-hand side is written as a product of two two-point functions. This is fine informally, but should be stated as a schematic factorization check, since the OPE normalization may introduce additional factors.
  4. [Sec. 1.1, Eq. (1.5)] The sentence 'The operator W is a spin-3 descendant of T4, whose scaling dimension is fixed...' is ambiguous: it is W's dimension that is fixed in terms of Δ_T4, not T4's dimension.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the WF subsector scenario is a deferred conjecture, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is largely self-contained. The paradox argument (Sec. 1.1) is a self-contained reductio: using the external Ising spectrum (no Δ=5, ℓ=3 operator) and the explicitly stated analyticity assumptions (Assumptions 1–2), the multiplet-recombination requirement (Eq. 1.5) forces an unwanted operator, ruling out literal equality between the d→2 WF limit and the 2d Ising CFT. No quantity here is defined in terms of the conclusion. The O(n) toy model (Sec. 2) is solved in-paper: the partition function is taken from di Francesco–Saleur–Zuber and Read–Saleur, Virasoro blocks from BPZ equations, and OPE coefficients from Dotsenko–Fateev, with explicit verification that the n→1 limit of ⟨εεεε⟩ reduces to the Ising four-point function (Eq. 2.13) and that the ε′/ψ cancellation in the global-block expansion is computed rather than imposed (Eqs. 2.20–2.25). The author's prior work [22] (Gorbenko–Zan) supplies the null-operator criterion and the logarithmic-CFT characterization of the O(n) model; this is a self-citation with author overlap, but it is not load-bearing in a circular way because the present paper independently reproduces the key correlation functions and the criterion's output is verified by the explicit Ising-limit computation, while [32] (Nivesvivat–Ribault) independently supports the log-CFT structure. The WF-resident test (Sec. 3.2) is honestly preliminary: the (2,2) candidate extrapolates to Δ≈5.56 rather than the required Δ=5 (Eq. 3.6), the spin-3 component is never exhibited, and no OPE coefficient confirming decoupling from Ising correlators is computed; Secs. 3.1, 3.2 and 4 explicitly defer the decisive higher-order checks to future work. That is an evidence gap — a conjecture whose test is pending — not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and the 'right ballpark' language candidly acknowledges a numerical near-miss rather than a forced match. The score reflects the presence of one minor, non-load-bearing self-citation ([22]); the central derivation itself has independent content and external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper contributes an interpretation over known exact data and perturbation theory; it adds no fitted constants, so the free-parameter count is zero. The load-bearing assumptions are analyticity of Wilson-Fisher data in d and the validity of Deligne-category representation theory. No new physical entity with independent evidence is introduced; the 'Ising subsector' and 'negative-multiplicity operators' are internal constructions.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Wilson-Fisher fixed point exists and obeys Euclidean CFT axioms (locality, OPE, crossing) for all d in [2,4], despite being non-unitary.
    Stated as Assumption 1 in Sec. 1.1; not proven, but standard in the fractional-dimension CFT literature.
  • domain assumption Conformal data (dimensions, multiplicities, OPE coefficients) depends analytically on d for 2<d<4.
    Assumption 2 in Sec. 1.1; load-bearing for the multiplet-recombination argument that the operator W must survive at d=2.
  • domain assumption O(d) representation theory can be continued to non-integer d via Deligne categories, and representation dimensions can become negative at integer d.
    Sec. 3.1 relies on refs. [43,30] to make sense of negative-multiplicity operators in the Wilson-Fisher CFT.
  • domain assumption The exact O(n) torus partition function (2.1) and OPE coefficients from generalized minimal models are correct inputs.
    The toy model rests on exact results from [29,31] and [65]; used as ground truth for the n→1 limit.
  • standard math The 2d Ising spectrum is exactly known and contains no operator with holomorphic/antiholomorphic weights (4,1) or (1,4).
    Follows from Virasoro null states; used to establish the paradox in Sec. 1.1.
invented entities (2)
  • Unitary Ising subsector of the Wilson-Fisher fixed point at integer d no independent evidence
    purpose: Reconcile exact Ising correlation functions with the presence of non-Ising operators required by multiplet recombination.
    Proposed scenario, not directly observed; the paper argues it is the minimal resolution of the paradox.
  • Negative-multiplicity O(d) operators (e.g., (2,2), (3,2)) in the Wilson-Fisher CFT at d=2 no independent evidence
    purpose: Cancel the unwanted non-Ising operators in all Ising-subsector correlation functions.
    Only one-loop scaling dimensions are given (in the 'right ballpark'), and no exact cancellation is demonstrated.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20670 in / 15805 out tokens · 179813 ms · 2026-08-03T07:31:26.994746+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Wilson-Fisher fixed point defines a continuous family of interacting conformal field theories in non-integer dimensions. In integer dimensions, it is widely believed to lie in the same universality class as the critical Ising model. In this work, we revisit the identification between the Wilson-Fisher fixed point at integer dimensions and the Ising CFT. We argue that a literal equality between the two theories is incompatible with the emergence of Virasoro symmetry in two dimensions. Instead, we propose that the Ising model emerges only as a subsector of the Wilson-Fisher fixed point. We support this scenario through a detailed study of the two-dimensional $O(n)$ model and by examining operators transforming in irreducible representations of the orthogonal group whose multiplicities become negative for integer values of the spacetime dimension. Finally, we comment on the implications of these results for attempts to construct a $d=2+\epsilon$ expansion starting from exact two-dimensional data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Local CFTs extremise $F$

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Local CFTs lie at the extrema of the sphere free energy tilde F for nonlocal CFT lines, and maximize it when unitary.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions,

    K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher, “Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 28(1972) 240–243

    1972

  2. [2]

    ϕ 4 theory at seven loops,

    O. Schnetz, “ϕ 4 theory at seven loops,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 3, (2023) 036002, arXiv:2212.03663 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Minimally subtracted six loop renormalization of O(n)-symmetricϕ 4 theory and critical exponents,

    M. V. Kompaniets and E. Panzer, “Minimally subtracted six loop renormalization of O(n)-symmetricϕ 4 theory and critical exponents,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 3, (2017) 036016, arXiv:1705.06483 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Benchmarking the Ising universality class in 3≤d <4 dimensions,

    C. Bonanno, A. Cappelli, M. Kompaniets, S. Okuda, and K. J. Wiese, “Benchmarking the Ising universality class in 3≤d <4 dimensions,”SciPost Phys.14no. 5, (2023) 135, arXiv:2210.03051 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Conformal Field Theories in Fractional Dimensions,

    S. El-Showk, M. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Conformal Field Theories in Fractional Dimensions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 141601,arXiv:1309.5089 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Precision Islands in the Ising and O(N) Models,

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Precision Islands in the Ising and O(N) Models,”JHEP08(2016) 036,arXiv:1603.04436 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor,

    C.-H. Chang, V. Dommes, R. S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M. S. Mitchell, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor,” JHEP03(2025) 136,arXiv:2411.15300 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Crystal statistics. i. a two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition,

    L. Onsager, “Crystal statistics. i. a two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition,”Phys. Rev.65(Feb, 1944) 117–149. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.65.117

    doi:10.1103/physrev.65.117 1944

  9. [9]

    The Spontaneous Magnetization of a Two-Dimensional Ising Model,

    C. N. Yang, “The Spontaneous Magnetization of a Two-Dimensional Ising Model,”Phys. Rev.85(1952) 808–816

    1952

  10. [10]

    Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B241(1984) 333–380

    1984

  11. [11]

    Goldenfeld,Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group

    N. Goldenfeld,Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group. 1992

    1992

  12. [12]

    DROPLET THEORY OF LOW DIMENSIONAL ISING MODELS,

    A. D. Bruce and D. J. Wallace, “DROPLET THEORY OF LOW DIMENSIONAL ISING MODELS,”Phys. Rev. Lett.47(1981) 1743. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 48, 446 (1982)]. 20

    1981

  13. [13]

    No unitary bootstrap for the fractal Ising model,

    J. Golden and M. F. Paulos, “No unitary bootstrap for the fractal Ising model,”JHEP03 (2015) 167,arXiv:1411.7932 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Truncated conformal space approach in d dimensions: A cheap alternative to lattice field theory?,

    M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov, and B. C. van Rees, “Truncated conformal space approach in d dimensions: A cheap alternative to lattice field theory?,”Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 025005,arXiv:1409.1581 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Unitarity violation at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in 4-ϵdimensions,

    M. Hogervorst, S. Rychkov, and B. C. van Rees, “Unitarity violation at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in 4-ϵdimensions,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 12, (2016) 125025,arXiv:1512.00013 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Theϵ-expansion from conformal field theory,

    S. Rychkov and Z. M. Tan, “Theϵ-expansion from conformal field theory,”J. Phys. A48 no. 29, (2015) 29FT01,arXiv:1505.00963 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Slightly broken higher-spin current in bosonic and fermionic QED in the large-Nlimit,

    Z. Zhou and Y.-C. He, “Slightly broken higher-spin current in bosonic and fermionic QED in the large-Nlimit,”SciPost Phys.15no. 2, (2023) 072,arXiv:2205.07897 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Long-range critical exponents near the short-range crossover,

    C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “Long-range critical exponents near the short-range crossover,”Phys. Rev. Lett.118no. 24, (2017) 241601,arXiv:1703.03430 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality,

    C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality,”J. Phys. A50no. 35, (2017) 354002, arXiv:1703.05325 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Bootstrapping the long-range Ising model in three dimensions,

    C. Behan, “Bootstrapping the long-range Ising model in three dimensions,”J. Phys. A52 no. 7, (2019) 075401,arXiv:1810.07199 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Long-range minimal models,

    C. Behan, D. Benedetti, F. Eustachon, and E. Lauria, “Long-range minimal models,” arXiv:2509.26372 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    Two-dimensional O(n) models and logarithmic CFTs,

    V. Gorbenko and B. Zan, “Two-dimensional O(n) models and logarithmic CFTs,”JHEP 10(2020) 099,arXiv:2005.07708 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Quantum groups as global symmetries,

    B. Gabai, V. Gorbenko, J. Qiao, B. Zan, and A. Zhabin, “Quantum groups as global symmetries,”JHEP08(2025) 087,arXiv:2410.24142 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Logarithmic conformal field theories as limits of ordinary CFTs and some physical applications,

    J. Cardy, “Logarithmic conformal field theories as limits of ordinary CFTs and some physical applications,”J. Phys. A46(2013) 494001,arXiv:1302.4279 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    The tricritical Ising CFT and conformal bootstrap,

    J. Henriksson, “The tricritical Ising CFT and conformal bootstrap,”JHEP08(2025) 031, arXiv:2501.18711 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Dependence of critical properties on dimensionality of spins,

    H. E. Stanley, “Dependence of critical properties on dimensionality of spins,”Phys. Rev. Lett.20(1968) 589

    1968

  27. [27]

    Duality Relations and Equivalences for Models With O(N) and Cubic Symmetry,

    E. Domany, D. Mukamel, B. Nienhuis, and A. Schwimmer, “Duality Relations and Equivalences for Models With O(N) and Cubic Symmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B190(1981) 279–287

    1981

  28. [28]

    Exact critical point and critical exponents of O(n) models in two-dimensions,

    B. Nienhuis, “Exact critical point and critical exponents of O(n) models in two-dimensions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1062

    1982

  29. [29]

    Relations between the Coulomb gas picture and conformal invariance of two-dimensional critical models,

    P. di Francesco, H. Saleur, and J. B. Zuber, “Relations between the Coulomb gas picture and conformal invariance of two-dimensional critical models,”J. Statist. Phys.49no. 1, (1987) 57–79. 21

    1987

  30. [30]

    Deligne Categories in Lattice Models and Quantum Field Theory, or Making Sense ofO(N) Symmetry with Non-integerN,

    D. J. Binder and S. Rychkov, “Deligne Categories in Lattice Models and Quantum Field Theory, or Making Sense ofO(N) Symmetry with Non-integerN,”JHEP04(2020) 117, arXiv:1911.07895 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Exact spectra of conformal supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models in two-dimensions,

    N. Read and H. Saleur, “Exact spectra of conformal supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models in two-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B613(2001) 409,arXiv:hep-th/0106124

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  32. [32]

    Logarithmic CFT at generic central charge: from Liouville theory to theQ-state Potts model,

    R. Nivesvivat and S. Ribault, “Logarithmic CFT at generic central charge: from Liouville theory to theQ-state Potts model,”SciPost Phys.10no. 1, (2021) 021, arXiv:2007.04190 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

    1997

  34. [34]

    C = 1 Conformal Field Theories on Riemann Surfaces,

    R. Dijkgraaf, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “C = 1 Conformal Field Theories on Riemann Surfaces,”Commun. Math. Phys.115(1988) 649–690

    1988

  35. [35]

    Global symmetry and conformal bootstrap in the two-dimensionalO(n) model,

    L. Grans-Samuelsson, R. Nivesvivat, J. L. Jacobsen, S. Ribault, and H. Saleur, “Global symmetry and conformal bootstrap in the two-dimensionalO(n) model,”SciPost Phys. 12no. 5, (2022) 147,arXiv:2111.01106 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Critical loop models are exactly solvable,

    R. Nivesvivat, S. Ribault, and J. L. Jacobsen, “Critical loop models are exactly solvable,” SciPost Phys.17no. 2, (2024) 029,arXiv:2311.17558 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Moduli integrals and ground ring in minimal Liouville gravity,

    A. A. Belavin and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Moduli integrals and ground ring in minimal Liouville gravity,”JETP Lett.82(2005) 7–13

    2005

  38. [38]

    Three-point function in the minimal Liouville gravity,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Three-point function in the minimal Liouville gravity,”Theor. Math. Phys.142(2005) 183–196,arXiv:hep-th/0505063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  39. [39]

    Quantum Groups as Global Symmetries II. Coulomb Gas Construction,

    B. Gabai, V. Gorbenko, J. Qiao, B. Zan, and A. Zhabin, “Quantum Groups as Global Symmetries II. Coulomb Gas Construction,”SciPost Phys.19(2025) 070, arXiv:2410.24143 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Constraints on the spectrum of field theories with non-integerO(N) symmetry from quantum evanescence,

    W. Cao, X. Lu, and T. Melia, “Constraints on the spectrum of field theories with non-integerO(N) symmetry from quantum evanescence,”SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 055,arXiv:2312.10139 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Coupled minimal models revisited II: Constraints from permutation symmetry,

    A. Antunes and C. Behan, “Coupled minimal models revisited II: Constraints from permutation symmetry,”SciPost Phys.18no. 4, (2025) 132,arXiv:2412.21107 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion,

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion,”Nucl. Phys. B599(2001) 459–496,arXiv:hep-th/0011040

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  43. [43]

    La cat´ egorie des repr´ esentations du groupe sym´ etrique st, lorsque t n’est pas un entier naturel,

    P. Deligne, “La cat´ egorie des repr´ esentations du groupe sym´ etrique st, lorsque t n’est pas un entier naturel,” inProceedings of the International Colloquium on Algebraic Groups and Homogeneous Spaces: Mumbai 2004. 2007

    2004

  44. [44]

    The dimensions of irreducible tensor representations of the orthogonal and symplectic groups,

    R. C. King, “The dimensions of irreducible tensor representations of the orthogonal and symplectic groups,”Canadian Journal of Mathematics23no. 1, (1971) 176–188

    1971

  45. [45]

    The unitary representations of the Poincar\’e group in any spacetime dimension,

    X. Bekaert and N. Boulanger, “The unitary representations of the Poincar\’e group in any spacetime dimension,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes30(2021) 1,arXiv:hep-th/0611263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    The Structure of the spectrum of anomalous dimensions in the N vector model in (4-epsilon)-dimensions,

    S. K. Kehrein and F. Wegner, “The Structure of the spectrum of anomalous dimensions in the N vector model in (4-epsilon)-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B424(1994) 521–546, arXiv:hep-th/9405123. 22

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  47. [47]

    The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data,

    J. Henriksson, “The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data,”Phys. Rept.1002 (2023) 1–72,arXiv:2201.09520 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space,

    R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha, “Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space,”Phys. Rev. Lett.118no. 8, (2017) 081601,arXiv:1609.00572 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap,

    R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha, “A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap,”JHEP05(2017) 027,arXiv:1611.08407 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Interaction of Goldstone Particles in Two-Dimensions. Applications to Ferromagnets and Massive Yang-Mills Fields,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Interaction of Goldstone Particles in Two-Dimensions. Applications to Ferromagnets and Massive Yang-Mills Fields,”Phys. Lett. B59(1975) 79–81

    1975

  51. [51]

    Three Loop Calculations in the Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Sigma Model,

    S. Hikami and E. Brezin, “Three Loop Calculations in the Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Sigma Model,”J. Phys. A11(1978) 1141–1150

    1978

  52. [52]

    R. A. Jones,Explorations in two dimensional strongly correlated quantum matter: from exactly solvable models to conformal bootstrap. PhD thesis, MIT, 2024

    2024

  53. [53]

    Disturbing news about thed= 2 +εexpansion,

    F. De Cesare and S. Rychkov, “Disturbing news about thed= 2 +εexpansion,”PTEP 2025no. 09, (2025) 093B02,arXiv:2505.21611 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    On calculation of (2+epsilon) RG functions in the Gross-Neveu model from large N expansions of critical exponents,

    N. A. Kivel, A. S. Stepanenko, and A. N. Vasiliev, “On calculation of (2+epsilon) RG functions in the Gross-Neveu model from large N expansions of critical exponents,”Nucl. Phys. B424(1994) 619–627,arXiv:hep-th/9308073

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  55. [55]

    The Random-Bond Ising Model in 2.01 and 3 Dimensions,

    Z. Komargodski and D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Random-Bond Ising Model in 2.01 and 3 Dimensions,”J. Phys. A50no. 15, (2017) 154001,arXiv:1603.04444 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    Ising model close to d=2,

    W. Li, “Ising model close to d=2,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 9, (2022) L091902, arXiv:2107.13679 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Critical Ising Model in Varying Dimension by Conformal Bootstrap,

    A. Cappelli, L. Maffi, and S. Okuda, “Critical Ising Model in Varying Dimension by Conformal Bootstrap,”JHEP01(2019) 161,arXiv:1811.07751 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Spectrum continuity and level repulsion: the Ising CFT from infinitesimal to finiteε,

    J. Henriksson, S. R. Kousvos, and M. Reehorst, “Spectrum continuity and level repulsion: the Ising CFT from infinitesimal to finiteε,”JHEP02(2023) 218,arXiv:2207.10118 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  59. [60]

    Nonabelian Bosonization and Multiflavor QED and QCD in Two-dimensions,

    D. Gepner, “Nonabelian Bosonization and Multiflavor QED and QCD in Two-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 481–507

    1985

  60. [61]

    On the Realization of Chiral Symmetry in (1+1)-dimensions,

    I. Affleck, “On the Realization of Chiral Symmetry in (1+1)-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B 265(1986) 448–468

    1986

  61. [62]

    Phase Diagram of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model at Zero Temperature,

    R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, B. T. Søgaard, and B. Zan, “Phase Diagram of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model at Zero Temperature,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 3, (2024) 031603,arXiv:2305.04437 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [63]

    Phases of 2d Gauge Theories and Symmetric Mass Generation,

    R. Mouland, D. Tong, and B. Zan, “Phases of 2d Gauge Theories and Symmetric Mass Generation,”arXiv:2509.12305 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [64]

    EFT meets CFT: Multiloop renormalization of higher-dimensional operators in generalϕ 4 theories,

    J. Henriksson, S. R. Kousvos, and J. Roosmale Nepveu, “EFT meets CFT: Multiloop renormalization of higher-dimensional operators in generalϕ 4 theories,” arXiv:2511.16740 [hep-th]. 23

    arXiv

  64. [65]

    Four Point Correlation Functions and the Operator Algebra in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Invariant Theories with the Central Charge c <1,

    V. S. Dotsenko and V. A. Fateev, “Four Point Correlation Functions and the Operator Algebra in the Two-Dimensional Conformal Invariant Theories with the Central Charge c <1,”Nucl. Phys. B251(1985) 691–734

    1985

  65. [66]

    Two Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows in Next to Leading Order,

    R. Poghossian, “Two Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows in Next to Leading Order,”JHEP01(2014) 167,arXiv:1303.3015 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [67]

    Indecomposable fusion products,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and H. G. Kausch, “Indecomposable fusion products,”Nucl. Phys. B 477(1996) 293–318,arXiv:hep-th/9604026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  67. [68]

    On reducible but indecomposable representations of the Virasoro algebra,

    F. Rohsiepe, “On reducible but indecomposable representations of the Virasoro algebra,” arXiv:hep-th/9611160. 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv