REVIEW 2 cited by
Discovering and Explaining the Representation Bottleneck of DNNs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper explores the bottleneck of feature representations of deep neural networks (DNNs), from the perspective of the complexity of interactions between input variables encoded in DNNs. To this end, we focus on the multi-order interaction between input variables, where the order represents the complexity of interactions. We discover that a DNN is more likely to encode both too simple interactions and too complex interactions, but usually fails to learn interactions of intermediate complexity. Such a phenomenon is widely shared by different DNNs for different tasks. This phenomenon indicates a cognition gap between DNNs and human beings, and we call it a representation bottleneck. We theoretically prove the underlying reason for the representation bottleneck. Furthermore, we propose a loss to encourage/penalize the learning of interactions of specific complexities, and analyze the representation capacities of interactions of different complexities.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Conceptualizing Multi-scale Wavelet Attention and Ray-based Encoding for Human-Object Interaction Detection
A wavelet backbone with ray-origin attention encoding improves efficiency and self-comparison accuracy for human-object interaction detection, but remains below the FGAHOI baseline in accuracy despite fewer parameters.
-
INTER: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models by Interaction Guidance Sampling
INTER is a training-free logit-correction method that adds Harsanyi interaction scores to selected keyword tokens, lowering hallucination on six LVLM benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.