REVIEW 8 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Learning From Mistakes Makes LLM Better Reasoner
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) recently exhibited remarkable reasoning capabilities on solving math problems. To further improve their reasoning capabilities, this work explores whether LLMs can LEarn from MistAkes (LEMA), akin to the human learning process. Consider a human student who failed to solve a math problem, he will learn from what mistake he has made and how to correct it. Mimicking this error-driven learning process, LEMA incorporates mistake-correction data pairs during fine-tuning LLMs. Specifically, we first collect inaccurate reasoning paths from various LLMs, and then employ GPT-4 as a ''corrector'' to identify the mistake step, explain the reason for the mistake, correct the mistake and generate the final answer. In addition, we apply a correction-centric evolution strategy that effectively expands the question set for generating correction data. Experiments across various LLMs and reasoning tasks show that LEMA effectively improves CoT-alone fine-tuning. Our further ablations shed light on the non-homogeneous effectiveness between CoT data and correction data. These results suggest a significant potential for LLMs to improve through learning from their mistakes. Our code, models and prompts are publicly available at https://github.com/microsoft/LEMA.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
SWE-Review: Closing the Loop on Issue Resolution with Agentic Code Review
An agentic code reviewer that explores repositories to judge and diagnose AI-generated pull requests improves resolve rates from 27.5% to 56.9% and outperforms single-turn review baselines.
-
Learning from Failures: Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization with Verifiable Rewards
CIPO jointly optimizes standard RLVR rewards with correction samples derived from the model's own failed attempts, yielding better reasoning and self-correction on math and code benchmarks.
-
Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive
DPOP is a new loss function that prevents DPO from lowering preferred response likelihoods and outperforms standard DPO on diverse datasets, MT-Bench, and enables Smaug-72B to exceed 80% on the Open LLM Leaderboard.
-
Improving Factuality in LLMs via Inference-Time Knowledge Graph Construction
A framework for inference-time knowledge graph construction and expansion improves factual accuracy in LLMs on three QA benchmarks by combining internal LLM knowledge with selective external retrieval.
-
Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models
The paper unifies perspectives on Long CoT in reasoning LLMs by introducing a taxonomy, detailing characteristics of deep reasoning and reflection, and discussing emergence phenomena and future directions.
-
AdaSwitch: Adaptive Switching between Small and Large Agents for Effective Cloud-Local Collaborative Learning
AdaSwitch improves small local LLM performance on reasoning tasks by adaptively switching to a large cloud LLM upon detected errors, sometimes matching cloud results with far less overhead.
-
Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey
A survey that provides a taxonomy of methods for improving planning in LLM-based agents across task decomposition, plan selection, external modules, reflection, and memory.
-
From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models
The survey organizes the shift of LLMs toward deliberate System 2 reasoning, covering model construction techniques, performance on math and coding benchmarks, and future research directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.