Repulsive Dark Matter

Jeremy Goodman

REVIEW

Repulsive Dark Matter

Jeremy Goodman

Astrophysics · Submitted 2 Mar 2000 · 10 references

Pith's verdict: A clean, honest theory proposal: a repulsive BEC gives a density-independent minimum core radius and superfluidity, but the condensate itself is postulated, not derived.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 9 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDastro-ph/0003018 (version 1)

Pith ID5U2M6SRM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationJeremy Goodman. "Repulsive Dark Matter." arXiv:astro-ph/0003018 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/5U2M6SRM

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Goodman's paper is a short, clean theory proposal that has aged into a foundational reference for superfluid and BEC dark matter. The central result is correct and derived from scratch: an n=1 polytrope with a = sqrt(K/2πG) and r_c,min = 3a, independent of halo mass or central density. The superfluid critical-velocity argument (Eq. 5) is physically transparent and new for its time. The relativistic section is the most elegant part — the adiabatic-invariant quadrature (Eq. 9) yields both the nonrelativistic limit and the high-density p = ρ/3 result in one stroke, and the ΔN_ν estimate is a real, checkable constraint that comes out comfortably small. The derivations I can check all hold up: Eq. 3 follows from hydrostatic equilibrium, Ũ(0) = 3κ/m² follows from the perturbation-theory matrix element, and the ρ ∝ κ^{1/3} n^{4/3} limit is the standard φ⁴ result. The paper is also honest about its own weaknesses, which is rarer than it should be. The soft spots are real but mostly acknowledged. The biggest is that the condensate is postulated, not derived. The abstract says so ('I postulate a condensate'), and §2 notes that not all the dark matter will be in the condensate, but the paper never quantifies the fraction or its effect on the core radius. The stress-test note is right on the physics: for the implied m ~ 10 eV, thermal equilibrium at galactic virial temperatures gives a negligible condensate fraction, so the model needs a non-thermal formation channel like axion misalignment. The paper gestures at the axion analogy but doesn't adapt it. That said, the stress test slightly overreaches by calling the abstract's claim unconditional — the abstract explicitly postulates the condensate, so the floor is a floor for the condensate, not for every halo. The gap is real but it's the gap of the whole class. Second, the 'satisfying coincidence' z_rel ~ z_eq is tuning, not prediction, and the paper says as much. I'd push back on the reader's circularity score of 3: the paper doesn't present it as a prediction, so it isn't circular, just a coincidence noted honestly. Third, the claim that subgalactic structure is suppressed is argued, not computed. Peebles (2000) does the calculation and finds marginal over-suppression unless r_c,min ≤ 0.5 kpc; Goodman cites this and concedes it. The superfluid consequences for galactic dynamics are sketched and explicitly flagged as needing quantitative work. Who it's for: anyone working on BEC or superfluid dark matter, self-interacting dark matter, or the cusp-core problem. The derivations are worth reproducing. It deserves a serious referee — the physics is sound, the presentation is honest, and the gaps are the right ones to flag.

Referee report

Major objections (3)

[§2, Eq. (5); Abstract] The abstract claims that the model leads 'to superfluidity,' and §2 argues that the condensate is superfluid up to v_crit (Eq. 5). This requires a large condensate fraction, which the paper does not demonstrate. For the boson mass implied by Eq. (12) (m ≈ 10.7 κ^{1/4} r_{c,kpc}^{-1/2} eV, so m ~ 10 eV for r_c ~ 1 kpc and κ ~ 1), the thermal BEC critical temperature at n ~ 74 cm^-3 (Eq. 13) is ~10^-5 K, far below the virial temperature, so thermal condensation is negligible. The paper acknowledges at the end of §2 that 'not all of the dark matter will be in the condensate' but does not quantify the fraction or its effect. The minimum-core claim is more robust, because the mean-field pressure p = Kρ² is present for any momentum distribution (as the paper itself notes: 'since (2) gives the minimum pressure, (3) is the most compact possible equilibrium'), but the superfluidity and dynamical-friction claims require coherence. The paper should either justify a large non-thermal condensate fraction or soften the superfluidity claim.
[§3-4, Eq. (13)] The relic abundance is assumed, not derived. The paper postulates that the particles constitute Ω and derives n̄(z) from that (Eq. 13), but does not show that a scalar field with m ~ 10 eV and κ ~ 1 produces the right abundance. For m ~ 10 eV, the field oscillates at T ~ m ~ 10 eV, very early, and the naive misalignment abundance is enormous unless the initial displacement is tuned. The paper should state explicitly that the relic abundance is an assumption and discuss whether a plausible production mechanism exists.
[§4, point (ii) and footnote 1] The paper's numerical coincidence (r_c,min ~ kpc, z_rel ~ z_eq) is in tension with the cited Peebles (2000) constraint that the quartic model requires r_c,min ≤ 0.5 kpc. The paper acknowledges this ('marginally inconsistent') but does not quantify the allowed range or explore the consequences. Since the 'kpc' coincidence is one of the paper's main selling points, the tension should be addressed more quantitatively.

Minor objections (9)

[Eq. (14)] My own evaluation gives a coefficient ≈0.06 rather than 0.14; please check. The conclusion (ΔN_ν < 1) is unaffected.
[Abstract and §4] The statement that the energy density was 'comparable to that of photons at early times' overstates Eq. (14): ΔN_ν ≈ 0.14 corresponds to ρ/ρ_γ ≈ 3%, not 'comparable.' Please rephrase.
[Eq. (5)] The Landau critical velocity for a weakly interacting Bose gas is c_s = sqrt(nŨ(0)/m), a factor sqrt(2) smaller than the heuristic estimate given. Please check.
[§2, Eq. (1)] The derivation assumes all bosons in the same momentum state, but the mean-field pressure p = Kρ² is more general. The paper could state this explicitly to clarify that the minimum-core result does not require condensation.
[§2, last paragraph] The dynamical friction / bar drag argument is speculative and not quantified; the paper appropriately flags this ('will require a quantitative analysis'), but the reader would benefit from a brief estimate of the condensate fraction needed for the effect.
[§4, first paragraph] 'I are not aware of a strong particle-physics motivation' should read 'I am not aware.'
[§2, third paragraph] 'via by their gravitational interaction' has an extra 'by'; 'parts parts' is duplicated.
[References] Frieman et al. (1995) is listed in the references but does not appear to be cited in the text; please check. The text cites 'Swaters, Madore, & Trewhella 1999' but the reference list gives 2000; please reconcile.
[Eq. (4)] The definition 'Ω ≡ Ω/0.3' is self-referential; please use a different symbol (e.g., Ω_{0.3}).

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

A repulsive Bose-Einstein condensate of dark matter would give every galaxy halo a minimum core size, suppressing small-scale structure without warm or collisional particles.

The reading

Goodman asks whether the small-scale troubles of cold dark matter, namely cuspy halo centers and a surplus of satellite clumps, can be cured without making the dark matter warm or strongly self-colliding. His answer is a Bose-Einstein condensate of massive bosons that repel one another through a short-range potential, on top of gravity. Because the repulsive pressure grows as the square of the density, the self-gravitating equilibrium has a radius fixed by particle physics alone: $a = (K/2G)^{1/2}$ with $K = U(0)/2m^2$, so a halo core cannot shrink below $r_{c,min} = 3a$ no matter how much mass sits inside it. If that scale is about a kiloparsec, the same particles were relativistic until near matter-radiation equality, added a small amount of extra radiation at nucleosynthesis, and make the dark matter a superfluid whose resistance to stirring may spare galactic disks and bars.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the index-2 polytrope and its exact Lane-Emden solution: a density profile $sin(r/a)/(r/a)$ whose outer radius $a$ is independent of central density. That independence is what turns a galactic-scale observation, the core size, into a particle-physics number, and it is what makes the model predictive rather than descriptive. The second piece of machinery is the condensate's critical velocity, $v_{crit} = (2n U(0)/m)^{1/2}$, which sets the boundary between superfluid, coherent, non-dissipative behavior and normal behavior, and carries the paper's claims about dynamical friction and galactic bars.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a gas of massive bosons with a finite-range repulsive interaction has a pressure-density relation $p = K ho^2$, a polytrope of index 2, and that the self-gravitating spherical equilibrium of such a gas has the analytic profile $ho(r) = ho(0) sin(r/a)/(r/a)$ with $a = (K/2 pi G)^{1/2}$. The radius $a$ does not depend on the central density, so the core radius has a floor $r_{c,min} = 3a$ set only by the particle mass and coupling, while the central density fixes the total mass. The same interaction makes the condensate a superfluid: extracting a particle from the condensate costs an energy of order $n U(0)$, so an obstacle moving slower than $v_{crit} = (2n U(0)/m)^{1/2}$ cannot scatter particles out of it. The particles are realized as quanta of a scalar field with potential $V(phi) = m^2 phi^2/2 + kappa phi^4$, which gives $U(0) = 3 kappa/m^2$ and hence $m c^2$ of about $10.7 kappa^{1/4} r_{c,kpc}^{-1/2}$ eV. At high density the same field has $ho$ proportional to $kappa^{1/3} n^{4/3}$ and $p = ho/3$, exactly the equation of state of a noninteracting relativistic gas, which adds about $0.14 r_{c,kpc}^{2/3} (Omega_{0.3} h_{50}^2)^{4/3}$ effective neutrinos, within nucleosynthesis limits.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the dark matter is a nearly pure Bose-Einstein condensate whose repulsion has a range short compared with a kiloparsec, so that an observed core scale can be identified with the minimum radius $3a$ rather than with some other physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every dark halo acquires a floor on its core radius, $r_{c,min} = 3a$, fixed by $m$ and $kappa$ alone and independent of halo mass or central density, so the cusp problem is addressed by construction rather than by baryonic feedback.
Below $v_{crit}$, a perturbing potential such as a rotating galactic bar interacts coherently with the condensate and cannot scatter particles out of it, so dynamical friction on bars may be far weaker than for collisionless dark matter.
The required particle mass and present mean density follow from the assumed core scale: $m c^2$ of about $10.7 kappa^{1/4} r_{c,kpc}^{-1/2}$ eV and mean number density of about $74 kappa^{-1/4} r_{c,kpc}^{1/2} Omega_{0.3} h_{50}^2 (1+z)^3$ per cubic centimeter.
At high density the equation of state becomes $p = ho/3$ despite the interaction, adding about $0.14 r_{c,kpc}^{2/3} (Omega_{0.3} h_{50}^2)^{4/3}$ to the effective neutrino number, which is compatible with primordial nucleosynthesis.
Linear density fluctuations on comoving scales below a few megaparsecs are suppressed relative to cold dark matter, which is the wanted effect on subgalactic scales.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The model converts a galactic-scale measurement into a particle-physics constraint: a measured distribution of core radii across halo masses would over-determine $m$ and $kappa$, while a spread in core size at fixed mass would point to a partial condensate fraction rather than to new particle parameters.
Because the condensate couples coherently to a rotating bar, the slow-bar argument against dense dark halos would lose its force for this dark matter while remaining for cold dark matter; a survey of bar pattern speeds in barred spirals is therefore a cleaner discriminant than rotation-curve core fitting alone.
The near-coincidence between the redshift at which the particles become nonrelativistic and the redshift of matter-radiation equality means the model's linear power suppression peaks just where small-scale matter-power measurements are most constraining, so modest improvements in those measurements would sharply narrow the allowed $r_{c,min}$ rather than merely confirm or exclude the scenario.
The same mechanism would apply to any bosonic component that condenses with a repulsive self-interaction, so an axion-like sector with repulsion would leave a similar, possibly smaller, floor on halo cores even if it is not the dominant dark matter.

Original abstract

It seems necessary to suppress, at least partially, the formation of structure on subgalactic scales. As an alternative to warm or collisional dark matter, I postulate a condensate of massive bosons interacting via a repulsive interparticle potential, plus gravity. This leads to a minimum lengthscale for bound objects, and to superfluidity. Galactic dynamics may differ significantly from that of more generic dark matter in not unwelcome ways, especially in the core. Such particles can be realized as quanta of a relativistic massive scalar field with a quartic self-interaction. At high densities, the equation of state has the same form as that of an ideal relativistic gas despite the interactions. If the nonrelativistic lengthscale is of order a kiloparsec, then the energy density in these particles was comparable to that of photons at early times, but small enough to avoid conflict with primordial nucleosynthesis.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,561 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.33 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.53 · compares with prior results 0.65 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

It seems necessary to suppress, at least partially, the formation of structure on subgalactic scales. As an alternative to warm or collisional dark matter, I postulate a condensate of massive bosons interacting via a repulsive interparticle potential, plus gravity. This leads to a minimum lengthscale for bound objects, and to superfluidity. Galactic dynamics may differ significantly from that of more generic dark matter in not unwelcome ways, especially in the core. Such particles can be realized as quanta of a relativistic massive scalar field with a quartic self-interaction. At high densities, the equation of state has the same form as that of an ideal relativistic gas despite the interactions. If the nonrelativistic lengthscale is of order a kiloparsec, then the energy density in these particles was comparable to that of photons at early times, but small enough to avoid conflict with primordial nucleosynthesis.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	It seems necessary to suppress, at least partially, the formation of structure on subgalactic scales.	background 0.96	0.09	0.18	hedged possibility 0.64
s1	As an alternative to warm or collisional dark matter, I postulate a condensate of massive bosons interacting via a repulsive interparticle potential, plus gravity.	contribution 0.98	0.72	0.36	speculative 0.87
s2	This leads to a minimum lengthscale for bound objects, and to superfluidity.	result 0.90	0.68	0.23	asserted 1.00
s3	Galactic dynamics may differ significantly from that of more generic dark matter in not unwelcome ways, especially in the core.	interpretation 0.90	0.23	0.16	hedged possibility 1.00
s4	Such particles can be realized as quanta of a relativistic massive scalar field with a quartic self-interaction.	contribution 0.46	0.34	0.06	asserted 0.66
s5	At high densities, the equation of state has the same form as that of an ideal relativistic gas despite the interactions.	result 0.99	0.69	0.06	asserted 1.00
s6	If the nonrelativistic lengthscale is of order a kiloparsec, then the energy density in these particles was comparable to that of photons at early times, but small enough to avoid conflict with primordial nucleosynthesis.	result 0.64	0.53	0.07	asserted 0.60

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.94 · evidence from argument 0.63.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (10)

[5]

Frieman, J. A., Hill, C. T., Stebbins, A. & Waga, I. 1995, Cosm ology with Ultralight Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (11),

View on Pith 1995
[10]

Swaters, R. A., Madore, B. A., & Trewhella, M. 2000, ApJ, in pr ess (astro-ph/0001277) Spergel, D. N. & Steinhardt, P. J. 1999, Observational evide nce for self-interacting cold dark matter. astro-ph/9909386. Tremaine, S. & Weinberg, M. D. 1984, Dynamical friction in sp herical systems. MNRAS, 209,

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[82]

Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., and White, S. D. M. 1996, The Stru cture of Cold Dark Matter Halos. MNRAS 462,

View on Pith 1996
[107]

Chandrasekhar, S. 1939, An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure. (New York: Dover, reprinted 1967). Debattista, V. P. & Sellwood, J. A. 1998, Dynamical Friction and the Distribution of Dark Matter in Barred Galaxies. ApJ, 493,

View on Pith 1939
[289]

Toth, G. & Ostriker, J. P. 1992, Galactic disks, infall, and t he global value of Omega. ApJ 389,

View on Pith 1992
[305]

– 8 – Tkach¨ ev, I. I. 1991 On the possibility of Bose-star formati on. Physics Letters B, 261(3),

View on Pith 1991
[563]

Navarro, J. F. & Steinmetz, M. 2000, The core density of dark m atter halos: a critical challenge to the ΛCDM Paradigm? ApJ, 528,

View on Pith 2000
[607]

Olive, K. A. & Thomas, D. 1999, Generalized limits to the numb er of light particle degrees of freedom from big bang nucleosynthesis. Astroparticle Phys ics, 11 (4), 403-411. Peebles, P. J. E. 1993, Principles of Physical Cosmology . (Princeton: Princeton University Press). Peebles, P. J. E. 1999, Dynamics of a Dark Matter Field with a Q uartic Self-Inter...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[1481]

Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 1987 Galactic Dynamics . (Princeton: Princeton University Press). Carignan, C. 1985, Surface photometry of the Sculptor Group Galaxies, ApJS, 58,

View on Pith 1987
[2077]

Hogan, C. J. & Dalcanton, J. J. 2000, New Dark Matter Physics: Clues from Halo Structure. astro-ph/0002330. Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. 1999 , Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites? ApJ, 522,

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

Forward citations

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 348 citations worldwide. Full citation record

Gravothermal Evolution of Self-Interacting Dark Matter Halos across Knudsen Numbers
astro-ph.CO 2026-10 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

For idealized NFW halos, the gravothermal collapse time depends only on the Knudsen number, with a simple formula that interpolates between the long- and short-mean-free-path regimes.
CosmoDyn: a semi-analytic post-processing framework for the dynamical evolution of compact stellar systems and black holes in cosmological simulations
astro-ph.GA 2026-09 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

A semi-analytic post-processing framework that reconstructs evolving gravitational potentials from cosmological simulations to integrate orbits of compact stellar systems and black holes.
A No-Go Theorem for the Mass-Radius Relation of Solitons
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

A no-go theorem excludes Gamma in [0,d] for typical non-topological non-relativistic spherically symmetric solitons, with the same exclusion for barotropic fluid compact objects, ruling out natural soliton explanation...
Coherence and Quantum Stability of Relativistic Superfluid States
hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A charged scalar condensate is quantum-stable to all perturbative orders when it is described by the interacting vacuum of fluctuations, a non-Gaussian dressed coherent state that is an eigenstate of H minus mu Q.
Theory of Dark Matter Superfluidity
astro-ph.CO 2015-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A single superfluid dark matter component, whose phonons are postulated to obey a MOND-like action, is argued to reproduce MOND on galactic scales and LambdaCDM on cosmological scales.

Show 17 more citing papers

Binary-lens amplification of starlight: from magnification flares to quasi-periodic tracking of orbital evolution
astro-ph.GA 2026-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Gravitational lensing by supermassive black hole binaries produces a zoo of stellar flares and quasi-periodic signals whose peak shapes, spacings, and Fourier spectra encode the binary's period, eccentricity, inclinat...
Vortex-reconnection energy bounds in Bose-Einstein-condensed and superfluid dark matter halos
astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Vortex reconnections in BEC/superfluid dark matter halos produce dark-sector heating at a rate that is secular but sub-virial for relaxed non-interacting soliton cores, with the dominant uncertainty being the true vor...
Dark Matter-Independent Orbital Decay Bounds on Ultralight Bosons from OJ287
hep-ph 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

OJ287 orbital timing excludes ultralight scalar bosons with masses around 0.85 to 2.2 x 10^-21 eV through superradiance-cloud dynamical friction, independent of dark matter assumptions.
Heterodyne Broadband Detection of Axion Dark Matter
hep-ph 2020-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A fixed-frequency, two-mode superconducting cavity converts axion dark matter into a readable signal, giving broadband sensitivity to axion-photon couplings across fifteen decades of axion mass without any tuning.
Dynamical Friction in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Universe
astro-ph.CO 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Fuzzy dark matter heavier than about 10^-21 eV fails to solve the Fornax globular cluster timing problem, and the wave regime where analytic friction theory breaks down is mapped by 780 simulations.
CMB-HD: An Ultra-Deep, High-Resolution Millimeter-Wave Survey Over Half the Sky
astro-ph.CO 2019-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A white paper proposes CMB-HD, a two-telescope 30-meter millimeter survey over half the sky, with published Fisher forecasts reaching sigma(N_eff)=0.014, sigma(f_NL)=0.26, and 8-sigma discrimination of suppressed smal...
Oscillons and Dark Matter
hep-ph 2019-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Oscillons in axion-monodromy and plateau potentials live up to 3.4x10^8 inverse scalar masses, long enough to survive past matter-radiation equality for scalar masses below about 10^-19 eV.
Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter
astro-ph.CO 2016-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A boson of mass near 10^-22 eV reproduces large-scale cosmology while naturally producing cored halos, suppressing low-mass sub-halos, and slowing dynamical friction enough to keep Fornax's globular clusters in orbit.
Halo Properties in Cosmological Simulations of Self-Interacting Cold Dark Matter
astro-ph 2000-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Self-interacting dark matter with a cross section of roughly 10^-23 to 10^-24 cm^2/GeV produces galaxy halos with flat cores, low central densities, and near-spherical shapes, matching observations that collisionless ...
Cosmological simulations of the same spiral galaxy: satellite properties, the role of baryonic physics and star formation history in shaping dark matter cores/cusps
astro-ph.GA 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Satellites that form most of their stars early keep dark matter cusps, while late or continuous star formers develop oscillating cores, so the dwarf diversity problem may be explained by feedback history and tides wit...
Black Hole Hair from Scalar Dark Matter
gr-qc 2019-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A black hole embedded in oscillating scalar dark matter develops a mass-dependent scalar hair profile, ranging from a 1/r tail at low mass to a 1/r^{3/4} pile-up near the horizon at high mass.
Ultralight Repulsive Dark Matter and BEC
hep-ph 2016-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A repulsive self-interaction for ultralight axion dark matter is possible if the axion is the Wilson loop of a 5D gauged U(1) with 5D matter charges tuned to satisfy two inequalities.
Cosmological Constraints on Bose-Einstein-Condensed Scalar Field Dark Matter
astro-ph.CO 2013-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Requiring the scalar-field dark matter to finish its stiff and radiation-like phases before big bang nucleosynthesis and matter-radiation equality yields m >= 2.4e-21 eV/c^2 and 9.5e-19 <= lambda/(mc^2)^2 <= 4e-17 eV^-1 cm^3.
Risk-based framework to determine climate-informed design storms for road drainage infrastructure
physics.geo-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

A risk-index method combining climate projections, physiographic hazard, and socioeconomic vulnerability scales future design storms for Ontario road drainage.
Gravitational probes of dark matter physics
astro-ph.CO 2017-12 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

The authors propose a two-dimensional parameter space, interaction strength versus characteristic halo mass, to organize dark matter models and locate where astrophysical anomalies might reveal new dark-sector physics.
Small-scale structure of fuzzy and axion-like dark matter
astro-ph.CO 2019-12 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

Axion-like dark matter produces distinctive small-scale structure (solitonic cores, suppressed small-scale power, miniclusters, axion stars), and current observations push the fuzzy dark matter mass above roughly 10^-21 eV.
Small scale problems of the $\Lambda$CDM model: a short review
astro-ph.CO 2016-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

A review concluding that most small-scale tensions in the standard cosmological model can be traced to baryonic physics rather than to a failure of cold dark matter, with satellite planes and the baryonic Tully-Fisher...

How the literature uses it

78 arXiv papers cite this in 109 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 61 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper

In this paper we have applied those results to condensates of axions forming FDM, providing corrections to similar calculations which neglect the self-interaction of axions [ref] .

Decay of Ultralight Axion Condensates · Conclusions · contest 0.81

Cites it as background 45 papers

A different sort of self-interacting DM was proposed at about the same time as [ref] : bosonic, like the axion, but with a repulsive interaction [ref] .

Chance and Chandra (and repulsive dark matter) · Repulsive dark matter: Overview · 0.83
As a result, there is increased focus on alternative viable scenarios, including warm dark matter (WDM), which is often associated with fermions of particle mass of a few keV (typically treated as collisionless), Peccei-Quinn axions [ref] which are bosons of mass $∼10^-5$–$10^-3 eV$, and the ultralight FDM of mass $m∼10^-22$ eV, which is described by a classical scalar field and exhibits wave phenomena on scales of the de Broglie wavelength $λ_dB∼few×kpc$ [ref] .

First star-forming structures in fuzzy cosmic filaments · Introduction · 0.93
This type of DM has been dubbed “fuzzy DM (FDM)" [ref] and can be naturally identified with an almost massless axion, see for instance [ref] .

Fuzzy Dark Matter from Infrared Confining Dynamics · Introduction · 0.80

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [5]

Frieman, J. A., Hill, C. T., Stebbins, A. & Waga, I. 1995, Cosm ology with Ultralight Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (11),

View on Pith 1995

[2] [10]

Swaters, R. A., Madore, B. A., & Trewhella, M. 2000, ApJ, in pr ess (astro-ph/0001277) Spergel, D. N. & Steinhardt, P. J. 1999, Observational evide nce for self-interacting cold dark matter. astro-ph/9909386. Tremaine, S. & Weinberg, M. D. 1984, Dynamical friction in sp herical systems. MNRAS, 209,

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[3] [82]

Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., and White, S. D. M. 1996, The Stru cture of Cold Dark Matter Halos. MNRAS 462,

View on Pith 1996

[4] [107]

Chandrasekhar, S. 1939, An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure. (New York: Dover, reprinted 1967). Debattista, V. P. & Sellwood, J. A. 1998, Dynamical Friction and the Distribution of Dark Matter in Barred Galaxies. ApJ, 493,

View on Pith 1939

[5] [289]

Toth, G. & Ostriker, J. P. 1992, Galactic disks, infall, and t he global value of Omega. ApJ 389,

View on Pith 1992

[6] [305]

– 8 – Tkach¨ ev, I. I. 1991 On the possibility of Bose-star formati on. Physics Letters B, 261(3),

View on Pith 1991

[7] [563]

Navarro, J. F. & Steinmetz, M. 2000, The core density of dark m atter halos: a critical challenge to the ΛCDM Paradigm? ApJ, 528,

View on Pith 2000

[8] [607]

Olive, K. A. & Thomas, D. 1999, Generalized limits to the numb er of light particle degrees of freedom from big bang nucleosynthesis. Astroparticle Phys ics, 11 (4), 403-411. Peebles, P. J. E. 1993, Principles of Physical Cosmology . (Princeton: Princeton University Press). Peebles, P. J. E. 1999, Dynamics of a Dark Matter Field with a Q uartic Self-Inter...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[9] [1481]

Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 1987 Galactic Dynamics . (Princeton: Princeton University Press). Carignan, C. 1985, Surface photometry of the Sculptor Group Galaxies, ApJS, 58,

View on Pith 1987

[10] [2077]

Hogan, C. J. & Dalcanton, J. J. 2000, New Dark Matter Physics: Clues from Halo Structure. astro-ph/0002330. Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., & Prada, F. 1999 , Where Are the Missing Galactic Satellites? ApJ, 522,

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000