RECORD
Nucleosynthesis in neutrino-driven winds: I. The physical conditions
Astrophysics · Submitted 12 Nov 1996
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The derived entropy typically falls short, by a factor of two to three, of the value required to produce a strong r-process.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
During the first 20 seconds of its life, the enormous neutrino luminosity of a neutron star drives appreciable mass loss from its surface. Previous investigations have shown that this neutrino-driven wind could be the site where the r-process occurs. The nucleosynthesis is sensitive to four physical parameters characterizing the wind: its mass loss rate, the entropy per baryon, the electron fraction, and the dynamic time scale. Different authors, using numerical models for supernovae, have arrived at qualitatively different values for these key parameters. Here we derive their values analytically and test our analytic results by numerical calculations using an implicit hydrodynamic code. Employing our analytic and numerical methods, we also investigate how various factors can affect our results. The derived entropy typically falls short, by a factor of two to three, of the value required to produce a strong r-process. Various factors that might give a higher entropy or a more rapid expansion in the wind are discussed.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | During the first 20 seconds of its life, the enormous neutrino luminosity of a neutron star drives appreciable mass loss from its surface. | background 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Previous investigations have shown that this neutrino-driven wind could be the site where the r-process occurs. | background 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.04 | hedged possibility 0.98 |
| s2 | The nucleosynthesis is sensitive to four physical parameters characterizing the wind: its mass loss rate, the entropy per baryon, the electron fraction, and the dynamic time scale. | background 0.97 | 0.13 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Different authors, using numerical models for supernovae, have arrived at qualitatively different values for these key parameters. | gap 0.55 | 0.04 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | Here we derive their values analytically and test our analytic results by numerical calculations using an implicit hydrodynamic code. | method 0.60 | 0.96 | 0.04 | asserted 0.98 |
| s5 | Employing our analytic and numerical methods, we also investigate how various factors can affect our results. | contribution 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.03 | asserted 0.86 |
| s6 | The derived entropy typically falls short, by a factor of two to three, of the value required to produce a strong r-process. | result 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.70 | asserted 0.98 |
| s7 | Various factors that might give a higher entropy or a more rapid expansion in the wind are discussed. | contribution 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.05 | speculative 0.75 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
During the first 20 seconds of its life, the enormous neutrino luminosity of a neutron star drives appreciable mass loss from its surface. Previous investigations have shown that this neutrino-driven wind could be the site where the r-process occurs. The nucleosynthesis is sensitive to four physical parameters characterizing the wind: its mass loss rate, the entropy per baryon, the electron fraction, and the dynamic time scale. Different authors, using numerical models for supernovae, have arrived at qualitatively different values for these key parameters. Here we derive their values analytically and test our analytic results by numerical calculations using an implicit hydrodynamic code. Employing our analytic and numerical methods, we also investigate how various factors can affect our results. The derived entropy typically falls short, by a factor of two to three, of the value required to produce a strong r-process. Various factors that might give a higher entropy or a more rapid expansion in the wind are discussed.
Human review
References
How later papers used it
129 later papers cite it
9 later papers by other authors are listed below: 8 used its method or tool and 1 used its data or values.
Uses its method or tool 8 of 19 papers with this label
-
Used the approximate analytic form of the general equation of state from this paper, containing non-relativistic baryons, relativistic electrons and positrons, and photons.
The early evolution of magnetar rotation -- II. Rapidly rotating magnetars: Implications for Gamma-Ray Bursts and Super Luminous Supernovae (2023) · 0.99 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
-
Ran its simulations using the approximate analytic form of the general equation of state from this paper, containing non-relativistic baryons, relativistic electrons and positrons, and photons.
Favorable conditions for heavy element nucleosynthesis in rotating proto-magnetar winds (2024) · 1.00 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
-
Evolved the electron fraction as a function of radius and time using this paper's rates of capture of electrons, positrons, and neutrinos on baryons.
Heavy element nucleosynthesis in rotating proto-magnetar winds (2025) · 0.99 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
-
Took its model for protomagnetar outflows primarily from this paper's neutrino-driven winds prescription.
Systematic exploration of heavy element nucleosynthesis in protomagnetar outflows (2022) · 0.92 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
-
Adopted this paper's analytical prescription to model the properties of neutrino-driven winds from proto-neutron stars.
High-energy neutrino emission from magnetised jets of rapidly rotating protomagnetars (2022) · 1.00 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
-
Included only charged-current reaction rates in its neutrino heating and cooling terms using this paper's approximations.
High-entropy ejections from magnetized proto-neutron star winds: implications for heavy element nucleosynthesis (2017) · 0.97 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
-
In order to estimate the reaction rate $λ_ν̅_e p$, we model the accretion disk as a neutrino `light bulb' that irradiates the outflows using the approximation [ref] [equation] where $L_$ is the antineutrino luminosity of the disk and $⟨E_⟩$ is the corresponding average antineutrino energy.
Accretion Regimes of Neutrino-Cooled Flows onto Black Holes (2025) · Disk outflow model · 0.99
-
Assumed a simplistic spherically expanding adiabatic outflow model from this paper for the outflow.
Nucleosynthesis in advective disc and outflow: possible explanation for overabundances in winds from X-ray binaries (2019) · 0.93 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Uses its data or values 1 of 2 papers with this label
-
Started from this paper's established mass-loss rate of a non-rotating, unmagnetised proto-neutron star.
Magnetar birth: rotation rates and gravitational-wave emission (2019) · 0.93 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
How the literature uses it
40 arXiv papers cite this in 62 sentences
Papers citing it · 44 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 3 papers
-
We model the wind and jet largely following Ref. [ref] (see also Refs. [ref] ) and consider PMs described by an initial rotation period $P_i$ and dipole field strength $B_dip$.
Gamma-ray emission from decays of boosted nuclei in protomagnetar jets · Jet mechanism and model · 0.98
-
In order to estimate the electron fraction, we can use a formula that is given in [ref] for the neutrino-driven wind: [equation] with the electron neutrino and electron anti-neutrino luminosities, mean energies $L_ν_e$, $L_ν_e$, $ϵ_ν_e$, $ϵ_ν_e$, and the neutron-proton mass difference $Δ= m_n-m_p = 1.293$ MeV.
Nucleosynthesis in 2D Core-Collapse Supernovae of 11.2 and 17.0 M$_{\odot}$ Progenitors: Implications for Mo and Ru Production · The high-$Y_e$ tracers in the 11.2 M$_⊙$ model · 1.00
-
We estimate this target value using Eq. ([ref]) [ref] .
Multipolar neutrino radiation in binary neutron star mergers: Angular structure, rotational variability, and implications for electron fraction · Implications for Electron Fraction · 0.84
Cites it as background 12 papers
-
The existence of this outflow at the late stages of the explosion is investigated in the seminal 1986 work by Duncan, Shapiro and Wasserman [ref] and has been elaborated on in [ref] .
Near-critical supernova outflows and their neutrino signatures · Introduction · 0.86
-
An immediate consequence of flavor conversion, e.g. due to neutrino self-interactions, is that the change in the abundances and mean energies of $ν_e$ and $$ neutrinos would lead to a modified value of the equilibrium electron fraction corresponding to neutrino absorption, $$ [ref] , as well as the timescale over which $Y_e$ approaches $$ in outflows exposed to neutrino irradiation [ref] .
Fast Neutrino Conversion in Hydrodynamic Simulations of Neutrino-Cooled Accretion Disks · Introduction · 0.84
-
For many years since [ref] the high entropy wind has been considered as the most promising (realistic?) environment, expelled from newly formed (hot) neutron stars in core-collapse supernovae, which continue to release neutrinos after the supernova shock wave is launched.
Massive Stars and their Supernovae · Explosive Burning off Stability · 0.95
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.