Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Statistical mechanical derivation of the second law of thermodynamics

Statistical Mechanics · Submitted 14 Sep 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Therefore the second law is a logical necessity once we accept equilibrium statistical mechanics.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDcond-mat/0009206 (version 2)
Pith IDG33IB33T, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHal Tasaki. "Statistical mechanical derivation of the second law of thermodynamics." arXiv:cond-mat/0009206 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/G33IB33T
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,302 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.63 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In a macroscopic (quantum or classical) Hamiltonian system, we prove the second law of thermodynamics in the forms of the minimum work principle and the law of entropy increase, under the assumption that the initial state is described by a general equilibrium distribution. Therefore the second law is a logical necessity once we accept equilibrium statistical mechanics.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In a macroscopic (quantum or classical) Hamiltonian system, we prove the second law of thermodynamics in the forms of the minimum work principle and the law of entropy increase, under the assumption that the initial state is described by a general equilibrium distribution. contribution 0.55 0.93 0.60 asserted 1.00
s1 Therefore the second law is a logical necessity once we accept equilibrium statistical mechanics. interpretation 1.00 0.50 0.81 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In a macroscopic (quantum or classical) Hamiltonian system, we prove the second law of thermodynamics in the forms of the minimum work principle and the law of entropy increase, under the assumption that the initial state is described by a general equilibrium distribution. Therefore the second law is a logical necessity once we accept equilibrium statistical mechanics.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

15 arXiv papers cite this in 32 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 23 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Compares with it 2 papers
  • [ref] already proposed the quantum entropy operator in the form $𝒮 = ln𝒩$, but the connection with the Generalized Helmholtz Theorem (which has been introduced later [ref] ) was not made, neither the importance of the volume entropy as a good mechanical analogue of thermodynamic entropy for possibly low dimensional systems was recognized.

    Mechanical Proof of the Second Law of Thermodynamics Based on Volume Entropy · Thomson's formulation and the Minimal Work Principle · 0.88

  • For processes identical to the ones analyzed in Secs. [ref] and [ref] of the present paper – that is, canonically sampled initial conditions[ In fact, Tasaki and Campisi require only the weaker assumption that initial conditions be sampled from a distribution that is a monotonically non-increasing function of $H_A$. ] followed by Hamiltonian or unitary evolution – Tasaki [ref] and Campisi [ref] have derived inequalities that are expressed in our notation as follows (see Eq. 9 of Ref. [ref] and Eqs. 16 and 36 of Ref. [ref] ):

    Fluctuation relations and strong inequalities for thermally isolated systems · Discussion · 0.92

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Very recently it has been also proved that non-adiabatic transformations occurring in isolated systems which are initially in a state of thermal equilibrium always result in an increase of the expectation value of the volume entropy [ref] .

    Microcanonical phase transitions in small systems · Why volume entropy · 0.96

Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.