Pith.

Superconductivity · arXiv:cond-mat/0404005 v1 · submitted 1 Apr 2004

Homogenous nodal superconductivity coexisting with inhomogeneous charge order in strongly underdoped Bi-2212

K. McElroy, D.-H. Lee, J. E. Hoffman, K. M Lang, E. W. Hudson, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, J. Lee

show 1 more author

J.C. Davis

The paper says

“Surprisingly, this state coexists harmoniously with the low energy nodal quasi-particles.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We use novel STM techniques in concert to study the doping dependence of electronic structure in Bi-2212. At all dopings, the low energy states are relatively homogenous except for dispersive density-of-states modulations whose properties are used to elucidate the momentum-space characteristics of quasi-particles. The superconductive coherence-peaks, ubiquitous in near-optimal tunneling spectra, are destroyed with strong underdoping. A new spectral type, likely characteristic of the zero temperature pseudogap regime, appears in these samples. Exclusively in regions exhibiting this new spectrum, we find a quasi periodic modulations in dI/dV as well as in topograph with Q(2pi/4.5a,0) and (0,2pi/4.5a)+-15%. This is consistent with the existence of a local charge density modulation at these wave vectors. Surprisingly, this state coexists harmoniously with the low energy nodal quasi-particles. We discuss the relevance of these findings to the cuprate phase diagram and to the relationship between the pseudogap and superconductivity.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.78 · compares with prior results 0.17 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We use novel STM techniques in concert to study the doping dependence of electronic structure in Bi-2212. method 0.71 0.95 0.02 asserted 0.91
At all dopings, the low energy states are relatively homogenous except for dispersive density-of-states modulations whose properties are used to elucidate the momentum-space characteristics of quasi-particles. result 1.00 0.86 0.08 asserted 1.00
The superconductive coherence-peaks, ubiquitous in near-optimal tunneling spectra, are destroyed with strong underdoping. result 1.00 0.87 0.08 asserted 1.00
A new spectral type, likely characteristic of the zero temperature pseudogap regime, appears in these samples. result 0.99 0.86 0.09 hedged possibility 0.99
Exclusively in regions exhibiting this new spectrum, we find a quasi periodic modulations in dI/dV as well as in topograph with Q(2pi/4.5a,0) and (0,2pi/4.5a)+-15%. result 1.00 0.96 0.13 asserted 0.99
This is consistent with the existence of a local charge density modulation at these wave vectors. interpretation 0.98 0.78 0.11 hedged possibility 0.99
Surprisingly, this state coexists harmoniously with the low energy nodal quasi-particles. result 0.83 0.87 0.61 asserted 1.00
We discuss the relevance of these findings to the cuprate phase diagram and to the relationship between the pseudogap and superconductivity. interpretation 0.89 0.32 0.05 unclear 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,286 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 4 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

How each label was checked · JSON

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment