Superconductivity in two-band non-adiabatic systems

M.E. Palistrant; V.A. Ursu

REVIEW

Superconductivity in two-band non-adiabatic systems

M.E. Palistrant, V.A. Ursu

Superconductivity · Submitted 23 Feb 2006 · 37 references

Pith's verdict: A competent two-band non-adiabatic formalism whose central numerical claim runs outside the stated validity of its own vertex approximation.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDcond-mat/0602551 (version 3)

Pith IDRYWAULFG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationM.E. Palistrant, V.A. Ursu. "Superconductivity in two-band non-adiabatic systems." arXiv:cond-mat/0602551 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/RYWAULFG

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

This paper does something genuinely new: it extends the non-adiabatic vertex-correction program of Pietronero–Grimaldi to the Moskalenko two-band model and obtains a closed-form Tc that reduces to the known one-band limits. The clean structural result is that vertex and crossing corrections renormalize only the intraband couplings (Eq. 28), leaving interband couplings untouched. That is worth knowing.

The derivation is detailed and internally coherent in its own frame. The authors are also honest about the approximation (33), and the sqrt(e) compensation is flagged. No code or data is shipped, which is normal for a 2006 theory paper.

The soft spot is serious. The compact vertex formulas (26) are derived under the condition theta_c << omega0/mu_n. In the numerical section, half-filling gives m = omega0/mu_n, and Qc = theta_c/2, so the condition reads 2Qc << m. The headline results use Qc = 0.1 and m = 0.1, which violates this. The positive vertex values in Table 1 and the Tc enhancement in Fig. 1 are therefore outside the domain of the angular integration that produced them. This is an internal consistency problem, not just a disagreement about the physical premise. The small-momentum assumption of Eq. (17) is also imported from refs. 9–10 rather than derived, and the high-Tc conclusion goes away if that premise fails.

None of this kills the formalism. The interband non-renormalization result and the two-band Tc structure may well survive a more careful treatment. But as presented, the numerical demonstration of high Tc is not supported; the paper needs to either restrict itself to the valid regime (Qc << m/2) or show that the vertex functions remain reliable beyond it.

I would send this to a serious referee. It is competent, contains a new structural result, and the numerical flaw is a fixable parameter-regime issue rather than a nonsense argument.

Best

Referee report

Major objections (3)

[Section 3, Eq. (26); Section 5, Table 1 and Fig. 1] The derivation of Eq. (26) is stated to be valid for theta_c << omega_0/mu_n. With the half-filling choice mu_n = W_n/2 and m = 2*omega_0/W_n used in Section 5, one has m = omega_0/mu_n, and for small transferred momentum Q_c = q_c/(2p_F) ~ theta_c/2, so the validity condition becomes 2*Q_c << m. The headline parameters Q_c = 0.1 and m = 0.1 give 2*Q_c = 0.2, which is not small compared with m = 0.1; even m = 0.3 gives only marginal separation. Thus the positive vertex values PV1 = 0.679 and PC1 = 0.656 in Table 1 at m = 0.1, and the resulting upward renormalization of couplings and the high-Tc curve in Fig. 1, are computed outside the stated domain of the small-angle expansion. Since the claimed Tc enhancement and the isotope-effect drop below 1/2 both rely on these positive vertex corrections, the numerical demonstration of high Tc is not supported as it stands; the authors should either recompute in the parameter region satisfying 2*Q_c << m or provide an angular integration that is valid beyond this condition.
[Section 3, Eq. (17); Abstract and Section 5] The central conclusion is conditional on the small-momentum assumption in Eq. (17), g^2_mn(p,p') = g^2_mn * eta * theta(q_c - |p-p'|), which is cited to References [9,10] but not derived or quantitatively justified. Table 1 shows that the sign of the vertex functions changes with Q_c: at Q_c = 0.9 and m = 0.1 both PV1 and PC1 are negative, and Fig. 1 shows Tc suppression rather than enhancement. Therefore the high-Tc outcome is an implication of the input Q_c << 1, not an independent consequence of two-band physics plus non-adiabaticity. The abstract's formulation, which presents high Tc as a demonstrated result, should be made explicitly conditional on the small-q premise, and the authors should provide either a microscopic estimate or derivation of q_c from the cited strong-correlation models, or a systematic scan over Q_c to locate the enhancement/suppression crossover.
[Section 4, Eq. (33) and Fig. 1] The replacement in Eq. (33) is a McMillan-type factorization of the two phonon propagators, and the text states that the results in Fig. 1 are multiplied by sqrt(e) to compensate for the factor e^{-1/2} introduced by this approximation. This compensation is an ad hoc prefactor outside the derived expression for Tc in Eq. (43). While it does not change the qualitative parameter dependence, the absolute values of Tc/omega_0 in Fig. 1 depend on this unproven correction. The authors should state explicitly which curves use the sqrt(e) factor and ideally justify the correction by comparing with an unfactorized numerical evaluation of the gap equation in a simpler limit.

Minor objections (6)

[Section 3, Eq. (17)] The definition of eta in the sentence containing Eq. (17) is not readable as printed: 'eta is determined by relation eta <<theta(...)>>_FS = 1' does not parse. The authors should define eta explicitly, for example eta = 1/<theta(q_c - |p-p'|)>_FS, so that the Fermi-surface average of g^2_mn(p,p') reproduces the bare constant g^2_mn.
[Section 3, Eq. (28)] The displayed definition 'lambda_12 = V_12 N_2 ~lambda^z_nn = lambda_nn [1 + lambda_nn PV_n]' mixes the interband coupling lambda_12 with the band-diagonal renormalization and is confusing. Separate definitions for lambda_12 and for ~lambda_nn should be given on distinct lines, especially because the text states that the vertex functions affect only intraband couplings.
[Section 3, Eq. (26)] The notation E = 2*epsilon_F is introduced without comment, and E may be confused with the energy/frequency variables in the same formula. Use a distinct symbol such as E_F or 2*mu_n throughout.
[Section 5] Figures 1-3 are not included in the manuscript text I received; the captions and the text should state all parameter values and the precise definition of the plotted quantities, including whether the sqrt(e) correction is applied, so that the curves can be reproduced.
[Section 4, Eq. (43)] The choice of sign in the quadratic-form solution for xi_c is explained in words, but the corresponding branch selection should be stated explicitly in Eq. (43) and used consistently in Eq. (47), since the two roots can give very different Tc values.
[Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors and infelicities, including 'capter', 'trasmitted', and inconsistent comma/period formatting in tables. A careful proofreading pass is needed.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

In two-band systems with small phonon momentum transfer, non-adiabatic vertex corrections renormalize intraband couplings upward and raise the superconducting transition temperature even for weak coupling.

The reading

The paper aims to show that two-band superconductors can reach high transition temperatures even when electron-phonon coupling is weak, provided the phonons transfer very little momentum ($q \ll 2p_F$). It goes beyond the Migdal theorem by adding vertex and "intersecting" diagrams that correct the intraband coupling constants. In the small-momentum regime these corrections are positive and renormalize the effective couplings upward; at $Q_c = 0.1$ they raise $T_c$ substantially at small Migdal parameter $m$, while at $Q_c = 0.9$ they become negative and suppress $T_c$. The same corrections can drive the isotope coefficient below $1/2$, matching features seen in some high-temperature superconductors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the vertex functions $P_{V n}$ and $P_{C n}$ (plus $P'_{V n}$), which arise from diagrams with two intersecting electron-phonon interaction lines beyond the Migdal theorem. They are defined in Eq. (20) with a step-function cutoff $\theta(q_c - |\mathbf{p} - \mathbf{p}'|)$ on transferred momentum, and their Fermi-surface averages enter the renormalized couplings in Eq. (28): $\tilde{\lambda}_{11} = \lambda_{11} + \lambda_{11}^2 [2P_{V1}(Q_c,\omega_0) + P_{C1}(Q_c,\omega_0)]$. Their sign depends on $Q_c$; positivity at small $Q_c$ is what converts a weakly coupled two-band system into a high-$T_c$ one.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a two-band system with weak electron-phonon interaction, the non-adiabatic vertex functions $P_{V n}$ and intersecting functions $P_{C n}$ are positive when the cutoff momentum satisfies $Q_c = q_c/2p_F \ll 1$, and they renormalize the intraband couplings upward according to Eq. (28). This produces a superconducting transition temperature $T_c = (2\omega_0\gamma/\pi)e^{-\xi_c}$ with $\xi_c$ from Eq. (41), in which the effective couplings $\tilde{\lambda}_{11}$ and $\tilde{\lambda}_{22}$ are enhanced while the interband couplings remain unrenormalized. Numerical results at $Q_c = 0.1$ show a large increase of $T_c$ relative to the adiabatic two-band result, largest for small $m$ ($m \sim 0.1$), while at $Q_c = 0.9$ the vertex corrections are negative and $T_c$ is suppressed. The isotope coefficient $\alpha$ drops to about $0.2$ in this regime, in contrast to the BCS value $1/2$.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the assumption in Eq. (17), taken from refs. [9,10], that strong electron correlations restrict electron-phonon momentum transfers to $q_c \ll 2p_F$, because the vertex functions are positive only in this regime; the paper does not derive or test that premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For materials where strong correlations or quasi-one-dimensional dispersion make $q_c \ll 2p_F$, weak electron-phonon coupling no longer rules out high $T_c$.
Two-band overlap plus non-adiabaticity can produce $T_c$ values comparable to those of high-temperature oxides while keeping the isotope effect anomalously small ($\alpha \sim 0.2$).
The interband coupling constants $\lambda_{12}$, $\lambda_{21}$ are not renormalized by vertex corrections, so pure interband pairing without intraband coupling is unaffected by this mechanism.
At large transferred momentum ($Q_c \sim 1$), vertex corrections are negative and the two-band non-adiabatic correction suppresses $T_c$, consistent with earlier one-band studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Since the enhancement grows as $m \to 0$, the mechanism predicts the strongest relative gains in systems with very small Fermi energies or stiff phonons, and suggests that materials with small $\omega_0/\varepsilon_F$ merit focused experimental attention.
The same sign dependence on $Q_c$ implies a testable crossover: if an experimental probe or ab initio calculation could tune $q_c$ in a two-band material, $T_c$ should rise sharply as $Q_c$ decreases below roughly $0.3$ and fall as $Q_c$ approaches $1$.
The paper's reliance on the step-function cutoff in Eq. (17) means the quantitative size of the enhancement depends on how sharply correlations restrict the phonon momentum; a smoother cutoff may soften but not erase the effect.

Original abstract

Theory of superconductivity in two-band non-adiabatic systems with strong electron correlations in the linear approximation over non-adiabaticity is built in the article. Having assumed weak electron-phonon interaction analytical expressions for the vertex functions and "intersecting " functions for each energy band are obtained. Mass operators of Green functions with account of diagrams with intersection of two lines of electron- phonon interaction (exceeding the frameworks of Migdal theorem) are derived as well as main equations of theory of superconductivity in two-band systems. Analytical formulas for the temperature of superconducting transition Tc are obtained as well as renormalization of the quantities which enter these formulas because of effects of non-adiabaticity and strong electron correlations. Dependence of Tc and coefficient of isotope effect on Migdal parameter m is studied. Overlapping of energy bands on Fermi surface with effects of non-adiabaticity at low values of transferred momentum is shown to obtain high values of Tc even assuming weak electron-phonon interaction.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,057 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.45 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.12 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Theory of superconductivity in two-band non-adiabatic systems with strong electron correlations in the linear approximation over non-adiabaticity is built in the article. Having assumed weak electron-phonon interaction analytical expressions for the vertex functions and "intersecting " functions for each energy band are obtained. Mass operators of Green functions with account of diagrams with intersection of two lines of electron- phonon interaction (exceeding the frameworks of Migdal theorem) are derived as well as main equations of theory of superconductivity in two-band systems. Analytical formulas for the temperature of superconducting transition Tc are obtained as well as renormalization of the quantities which enter these formulas because of effects of non-adiabaticity and strong electron correlations. Dependence of Tc and coefficient of isotope effect on Migdal parameter m is studied. Overlapping of energy bands on Fermi surface with effects of non-adiabaticity at low values of transferred momentum is shown to obtain high values of Tc even assuming weak electron-phonon interaction.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Theory of superconductivity in two-band non-adiabatic systems with strong electron correlations in the linear approximation over non-adiabaticity is built in the article.	contribution 0.99	0.92	0.07	asserted 1.00
s1	Having assumed weak electron-phonon interaction analytical expressions for the vertex functions and "intersecting " functions for each energy band are obtained.	method 0.49	0.92	0.05	asserted 1.00
s2	Mass operators of Green functions with account of diagrams with intersection of two lines of electron- phonon interaction (exceeding the frameworks of Migdal theorem) are derived as well as main equations of theory of superconductivity in two-band systems.	contribution 0.53	0.94	0.08	asserted 1.00
s3	Analytical formulas for the temperature of superconducting transition Tc are obtained as well as renormalization of the quantities which enter these formulas because of effects of non-adiabaticity and strong electron correlations.	result 0.85	0.94	0.18	asserted 1.00
s4	Dependence of Tc and coefficient of isotope effect on Migdal parameter m is studied.	contribution 0.78	0.89	0.07	asserted 0.94
s5	Overlapping of energy bands on Fermi surface with effects of non-adiabaticity at low values of transferred momentum is shown to obtain high values of Tc even assuming weak electron-phonon interaction.	result 0.96	0.88	0.70	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v3

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (37)

[1]

J. G. Berdnorz and K. A. Miiller, Z. Phys. B, 64, 189 (1986). 15

View on Pith 1986
[2]

V. A. Moskalenko, Fiz. Met.Metalloved ; 8, 503 (1959); Phys. Met. and Metallog. 8, 25 (1959)

View on Pith 1959
[3]

H. Suhl, B. T. Matthias, and L. R. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 552 (1959)

View on Pith 1959
[4]

M. E. Palistrant, arXiv: cond - mat / 0305491 (2003); Moldavian J ournal of the Physical Sciences, 3 N2 (2004)

View on Pith 2003
[5]

L. Z. Kon, arXiv: cond - mat /0309707 (2003)

View on Pith 2003
[6]

V. A. Moskalenko, M. E. Palistrant and V. M. Vakalyuk, Usp. Fiz. Nauk , 161, 155 (1991); Sov. Phys. Usp. 34, 717 (1991); arXiv: cond - mat/03099671

View on Pith arXiv 1991
[7]

A. B. Migdal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , 34,1438 (1958)

View on Pith 1958
[8]

O. V. Danilenko and O. V. Dolgov, Preprint cond - mat 0007189

View on Pith
[9]

M. L. Kulic and R. Zeyher, Phys. Rev. B , 49, 4395 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[10]

R. Zeyher and M. L. Kulic , Phys. Rev. B , 53, 2850 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[11]

L. Pietronero, S. Strassler and S. Grimaldi, Phys. Rev. B , 52, 10516 (1995)

View on Pith 1995
[12]

S. Grimaldi, L. Pietronero and Strassler, Phys. Rev. B , 52, 10530 (1995)

View on Pith 1995
[13]

M. E. Palistrant, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. , 500 (2005); Low Temperature Physics , 31, 738 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[14]

A. A. Abrikosov, Y. C. Campuzano and K. Gofron, Physica C, 214, 73 (1993)

View on Pith 1993
[15]

M. E. Palistrant and F. G. Kochorbe, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. , 26 557 (2000); J. of Su- perconductivity: Incoparating Novel Magnetizm , 15, 113 (2002); J. Phys. Condens Matter, 15, 3267 (2003); Low Temp. Phys. , 29, 1173 (2003); International Journal of Modern Physics B , 17, 2545 (2003)

View on Pith 2000
[16]

M. E. Palistrant, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. , 28 157 (2002); Teoret. i Mat. Fizika , 135, 137 (2003); Theoret. Mathem. Phys. , 135, 566 (2003)

View on Pith 2002
[17]

J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagawa, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani and J. Akimistu, Nature (London), 463, 401 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[18]

P. C. Conﬁeld, S. L. Bud’ko and D. K. Finemore, Physica C, 385, 1 (2003). 16

View on Pith 2003
[19]

F. Bouquet, J. Wang, I. Sheikin et al., Physica C , 385, 192 (2003)

View on Pith 2003
[20]

T. Mishonov, S. L. Drechsler and E. Penev, Modern Physics Letters B, 17, 755 (2003); arXiv: cond - mat/0209192

View on Pith arXiv 2003
[21]

T. Mishonov, E. Penev, J. O. Indekeu and V. I. Pokrovsky, ar Xiv: cond - mat/0209342 ; Phys. Rev. B , 68 104517 (2003)

View on Pith arXiv 2003
[22]

O. V. Dolgov, R. K. Kremer at al., Phys. Rev. B , 72 024504 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[23]

A. S. Aleksandrov, Preprint cond - mat/0102189

View on Pith arXiv
[24]

H. Krakauer and E. Pickett, Z. Phys. , 60, 1665 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[25]

J. F. Herman, R. V. Kasowski and W. G. Hsu, Phys. Rev. B , 36, 6904 (1987)

View on Pith 1987
[26]

J. Kortus, I. I. Mazin, K. D. Belashchenko, V. P. Antropov an d L. L. Boyer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 4656 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[27]

J. M. An and W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 4366 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[28]

A. A. Abricosov, L. P. Gor’kov and I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, Quantum Field Theoretical Methods in Statistical Physics Moscow, Nauka (1962); Prentice - Hall, Englewood Cliﬀs , N7 (1963)

View on Pith 1962
[29]

F. G. Kochorbe and M. E. Palistrant, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , 104, 3084 (1993); [ JETP 77, 442 (1993)]; Teoret. Mathem. Phis. 96, 459 (1993); [ Theoret. Mathem. Phys. 96, 1083 (1993)]

View on Pith 1993
[30]

M. E. Palistrant, Intern. Joyrnal of Modern Physics B 19, 929 - 970 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[31]

W. L. Mc Millan, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968)

View on Pith 1968
[32]

V. A. Moskalenko, L. Z. Kon and M. E. Palistrant, Low - Temperature Properties of Metals with Band - Spectrum singularities [in Russian], Shtiintsa, Kishinev (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[33]

M. E. Palistrant and F. G. Kochorbe , Physica C, 351 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[34]

R. Combescot, Phys. Rev. B 42, 7810 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[35]

J. H. Kim and Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4218 (1993)

View on Pith 1993
[36]

A. Lanzara, P. V. Bogdanov, X. I.Zhow at al. Nature 412, 510 (2001). 17

View on Pith 2001
[37]

V. A. Moskalenko, P. Entil, M. Marinaro, D. F. Digor, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 124, 700 (2003) [ JETP 97, 632 (2003)]. 18 This figure "fig1.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/cond-mat/0602551v3 This figure "fig2.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/cond-mat/0602551v3 This figure "fig3.jpg" is available in "jpg" ...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

J. G. Berdnorz and K. A. Miiller, Z. Phys. B, 64, 189 (1986). 15

View on Pith 1986

[2] [2]

V. A. Moskalenko, Fiz. Met.Metalloved ; 8, 503 (1959); Phys. Met. and Metallog. 8, 25 (1959)

View on Pith 1959

[3] [3]

H. Suhl, B. T. Matthias, and L. R. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 552 (1959)

View on Pith 1959

[4] [4]

M. E. Palistrant, arXiv: cond - mat / 0305491 (2003); Moldavian J ournal of the Physical Sciences, 3 N2 (2004)

View on Pith 2003

[5] [5]

L. Z. Kon, arXiv: cond - mat /0309707 (2003)

View on Pith 2003

[6] [6]

V. A. Moskalenko, M. E. Palistrant and V. M. Vakalyuk, Usp. Fiz. Nauk , 161, 155 (1991); Sov. Phys. Usp. 34, 717 (1991); arXiv: cond - mat/03099671

View on Pith arXiv 1991

[7] [7]

A. B. Migdal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , 34,1438 (1958)

View on Pith 1958

[8] [8]

O. V. Danilenko and O. V. Dolgov, Preprint cond - mat 0007189

View on Pith

[9] [9]

M. L. Kulic and R. Zeyher, Phys. Rev. B , 49, 4395 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[10] [10]

R. Zeyher and M. L. Kulic , Phys. Rev. B , 53, 2850 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[11] [11]

L. Pietronero, S. Strassler and S. Grimaldi, Phys. Rev. B , 52, 10516 (1995)

View on Pith 1995

[12] [12]

S. Grimaldi, L. Pietronero and Strassler, Phys. Rev. B , 52, 10530 (1995)

View on Pith 1995

[13] [13]

M. E. Palistrant, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. , 500 (2005); Low Temperature Physics , 31, 738 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[14] [14]

A. A. Abrikosov, Y. C. Campuzano and K. Gofron, Physica C, 214, 73 (1993)

View on Pith 1993

[15] [15]

M. E. Palistrant and F. G. Kochorbe, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. , 26 557 (2000); J. of Su- perconductivity: Incoparating Novel Magnetizm , 15, 113 (2002); J. Phys. Condens Matter, 15, 3267 (2003); Low Temp. Phys. , 29, 1173 (2003); International Journal of Modern Physics B , 17, 2545 (2003)

View on Pith 2000

[16] [16]

M. E. Palistrant, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. , 28 157 (2002); Teoret. i Mat. Fizika , 135, 137 (2003); Theoret. Mathem. Phys. , 135, 566 (2003)

View on Pith 2002

[17] [17]

J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagawa, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani and J. Akimistu, Nature (London), 463, 401 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[18] [18]

P. C. Conﬁeld, S. L. Bud’ko and D. K. Finemore, Physica C, 385, 1 (2003). 16

View on Pith 2003

[19] [19]

F. Bouquet, J. Wang, I. Sheikin et al., Physica C , 385, 192 (2003)

View on Pith 2003

[20] [20]

T. Mishonov, S. L. Drechsler and E. Penev, Modern Physics Letters B, 17, 755 (2003); arXiv: cond - mat/0209192

View on Pith arXiv 2003

[21] [21]

T. Mishonov, E. Penev, J. O. Indekeu and V. I. Pokrovsky, ar Xiv: cond - mat/0209342 ; Phys. Rev. B , 68 104517 (2003)

View on Pith arXiv 2003

[22] [22]

O. V. Dolgov, R. K. Kremer at al., Phys. Rev. B , 72 024504 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[23] [23]

A. S. Aleksandrov, Preprint cond - mat/0102189

View on Pith arXiv

[24] [24]

H. Krakauer and E. Pickett, Z. Phys. , 60, 1665 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[25] [25]

J. F. Herman, R. V. Kasowski and W. G. Hsu, Phys. Rev. B , 36, 6904 (1987)

View on Pith 1987

[26] [26]

J. Kortus, I. I. Mazin, K. D. Belashchenko, V. P. Antropov an d L. L. Boyer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 4656 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[27] [27]

J. M. An and W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 4366 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[28] [28]

A. A. Abricosov, L. P. Gor’kov and I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, Quantum Field Theoretical Methods in Statistical Physics Moscow, Nauka (1962); Prentice - Hall, Englewood Cliﬀs , N7 (1963)

View on Pith 1962

[29] [29]

F. G. Kochorbe and M. E. Palistrant, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. , 104, 3084 (1993); [ JETP 77, 442 (1993)]; Teoret. Mathem. Phis. 96, 459 (1993); [ Theoret. Mathem. Phys. 96, 1083 (1993)]

View on Pith 1993

[30] [30]

M. E. Palistrant, Intern. Joyrnal of Modern Physics B 19, 929 - 970 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[31] [31]

W. L. Mc Millan, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968)

View on Pith 1968

[32] [32]

V. A. Moskalenko, L. Z. Kon and M. E. Palistrant, Low - Temperature Properties of Metals with Band - Spectrum singularities [in Russian], Shtiintsa, Kishinev (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[33] [33]

M. E. Palistrant and F. G. Kochorbe , Physica C, 351 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[34] [34]

R. Combescot, Phys. Rev. B 42, 7810 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[35] [35]

J. H. Kim and Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4218 (1993)

View on Pith 1993

[36] [36]

A. Lanzara, P. V. Bogdanov, X. I.Zhow at al. Nature 412, 510 (2001). 17

View on Pith 2001

[37] [37]

V. A. Moskalenko, P. Entil, M. Marinaro, D. F. Digor, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 124, 700 (2003) [ JETP 97, 632 (2003)]. 18 This figure "fig1.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/cond-mat/0602551v3 This figure "fig2.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/cond-mat/0602551v3 This figure "fig3.jpg" is available in "jpg" ...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003