Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Classical and Quantum Gravity in 1+1 Dimensions, Part II: The Universal Coverings

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 30 Nov 1995

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim A set of simple rules for constructing the maximal (e.g. analytic) extensions for any metric with a Killing field in an (effectively) two-dimensional spacetime is formulated.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/9511081 (version 3)
Pith IDPDGVRAJY, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationT. Kloesch, T. Strobl. "Classical and Quantum Gravity in 1+1 Dimensions, Part II: The Universal Coverings." arXiv:gr-qc/9511081 (1995). https://pith.science/paper/PDGVRAJY
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,765 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.84 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.75 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A set of simple rules for constructing the maximal (e.g. analytic) extensions for any metric with a Killing field in an (effectively) two-dimensional spacetime is formulated. The application of these rules is extremely straightforward, as is demonstrated at various examples and illustrated with numerous figures. Despite the resulting simplicity we also comment on some subtleties concerning the concept of Penrose diagrams. Most noteworthy among these, maybe, is that (smooth) spacetimes which have both degenerate and non-degenerate (Killing) horizons do not allow for globally smooth Penrose diagrams. Physically speaking this obstruction corresponds to an infinite relative red/blueshift between observers moving across the two horizons. -- The present work provides a further step in the classification of all global solutions of the general class of two-dimensional gravity-Yang-Mills systems introduced in Part I, comprising, e.g., all generalized (linear and nonlinear) dilaton theories. In Part I we constructed the local solutions, which were found to always have a Killing field; in this paper we provide all universal covering solutions (the simply connected maximally extended spacetimes). A subsequent Part III will treat the diffeomorphism inequivalent solutions for all other spacetime topologies. -- Part II is kept entirely self-contained; a prior reading of Part I is not necessary.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A set of simple rules for constructing the maximal (e.g. analytic) extensions for any metric with a Killing field in an (effectively) two-dimensional spacetime is formulated. contribution 0.92 0.94 0.50 asserted 1.00
s1 The application of these rules is extremely straightforward, as is demonstrated at various examples and illustrated with numerous figures. contribution 0.38 0.81 0.06 asserted 1.00
s2 Despite the resulting simplicity we also comment on some subtleties concerning the concept of Penrose diagrams. limitation 0.50 0.70 0.05 asserted 0.82
s3 Most noteworthy among these, maybe, is that (smooth) spacetimes which have both degenerate and non-degenerate (Killing) horizons do not allow for globally smooth Penrose diagrams. result 0.94 0.76 0.27 asserted 0.69
s4 Physically speaking this obstruction corresponds to an infinite relative red/blueshift between observers moving across the two horizons. -- The present work provides a further step in the classification of all global solutions of the general class of two-dimensional gravity-Yang-Mills systems introduced in Part I, comprising, e.g., all generalized (linear and nonlinear) dilaton theories. interpretation 0.57 0.76 0.24 asserted 0.93
s5 In Part I we constructed the local solutions, which were found to always have a Killing field; in this paper we provide all universal covering solutions (the simply connected maximally extended spacetimes). contribution 0.61 0.91 0.29 asserted 1.00
s6 A subsequent Part III will treat the diffeomorphism inequivalent solutions for all other spacetime topologies. -- Part II is kept entirely self-contained; a prior reading of Part I is not necessary. future work 0.96 0.40 0.06 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.87 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A set of simple rules for constructing the maximal (e.g. analytic) extensions for any metric with a Killing field in an (effectively) two-dimensional spacetime is formulated. The application of these rules is extremely straightforward, as is demonstrated at various examples and illustrated with numerous figures. Despite the resulting simplicity we also comment on some subtleties concerning the concept of Penrose diagrams. Most noteworthy among these, maybe, is that (smooth) spacetimes which have both degenerate and non-degenerate (Killing) horizons do not allow for globally smooth Penrose diagrams. Physically speaking this obstruction corresponds to an infinite relative red/blueshift between observers moving across the two horizons. -- The present work provides a further step in the classification of all global solutions of the general class of two-dimensional gravity-Yang-Mills systems introduced in Part I, comprising, e.g., all generalized (linear and nonlinear) dilaton theories. In Part I we constructed the local solutions, which were found to always have a Killing field; in this paper we provide all universal covering solutions (the simply connected maximally extended spacetimes). A subsequent Part III will treat the diffeomorphism inequivalent solutions for all other spacetime topologies. -- Part II is kept entirely self-contained; a prior reading of Part I is not necessary.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • Lower dimensional – both (2+1)- and (1+1)-dimensional – theories for gravity have been formulated with a twofold purpose of clarifying the mathematical properties of the Einstein equations (since they are a system of coupled nonlinear partial derivative equations, their solution has been derived so far only in simplified cases requiring strong symmetry assumptions) in an analogue but formally simpler case, and for developing possible frameworks for a quantum formulation of the gravitational interaction [ref] .

    Curvature Invariants and Lower Dimensional Black Hole Horizons · Introduction: Locating the Event Horizon of a Black Hole · 0.99

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.