RECORD
Deformation of relativistic magnetized stars
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 12 Oct 1999
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We have found that the ellipticity becomes large with increase of a relativistic factor for the models with the same energy ratio of the magnetic energy to the gravitational energy.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We formulate deformation of relativistic stars due to the magnetic stress, considering the magnetic fields to be perturbations from spherical stars. The ellipticity for the dipole magnetic field is calculated for some stellar models. We have found that the ellipticity becomes large with increase of a relativistic factor for the models with the same energy ratio of the magnetic energy to the gravitational energy.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We formulate deformation of relativistic stars due to the magnetic stress, considering the magnetic fields to be perturbations from spherical stars. | contribution 0.65 | 0.91 | 0.05 | asserted 0.95 |
| s1 | The ellipticity for the dipole magnetic field is calculated for some stellar models. | method 0.52 | 0.92 | 0.06 | asserted 0.98 |
| s2 | We have found that the ellipticity becomes large with increase of a relativistic factor for the models with the same energy ratio of the magnetic energy to the gravitational energy. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.83 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We formulate deformation of relativistic stars due to the magnetic stress, considering the magnetic fields to be perturbations from spherical stars. The ellipticity for the dipole magnetic field is calculated for some stellar models. We have found that the ellipticity becomes large with increase of a relativistic factor for the models with the same energy ratio of the magnetic energy to the gravitational energy.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
10 arXiv papers cite this in 27 sentences
Papers citing it · 18 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 3 papers
-
Following Ref. [ref] , we expand $A_i$ and $J_i$ onto vector spherical harmonics and consider only a dipole magnetic field, $ℓ=1$.
Magnetized neutron stars: perturbative versus fully-numerical approaches · Magnetic field · 0.99
-
The relation between the vector potential and the radial component of the magnetic field at $θ=0$ is [Note that, as in [ref] , we use here the tetrad components of the magnetic field.] [ref] :
The gravitational Higgs mechanism and resulting smoking gun effects · Approach · 0.95
-
The resulting system of perturbation equation are then given by [ref]
Tidal deformability and gravitational-wave phase evolution of magnetised compact-star binaries · First-order magnetic-field perturbations · 0.88
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
Various approaches are possible here, with different assumptions and ansatz, going from semi-analytic models based on the perturbation of a spherically symmetric background star [ref] , to full numerical ones following first studies by e.g. [ref] .
Magnetized neutron stars: perturbative versus fully-numerical approaches · Introduction · 0.86
-
Unlike black holes, neutron stars possess a finite surface and their shape can deviate from spherical symmetry as a result of rotation, tidal deformation, and extreme magnetic fields [ref] .
Shirokov and Shapiro Effects in the Hartle-Thorne Spacetime · Introduction · 0.86
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.