Pith. Sign in

RECORD

GNO Solar Neutrino Observations: Results for GNOI

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
GNO Collaboration: M.Altmann, M.Balata, P.Belli, E.Bellotti, R.Bernabei, E.Burkert, C.Cattadori, G.Cerichelli
show 22 more authors
M.Chiarini, M.Cribier, S.d'Angelo, G.Del Re, K.H.Ebert, F.v.Feilitzsch, N.Ferrari, W.Hampel, J.Handt, E.Henrich, G.Heusser, J.Kiko, T.Kirsten, T.Lachenmaier, J.Lanfranchi, M.Laubenstein, D.Motta, W.Rau, H.Richter, S.Waenninger, M.Wojcik, L.Zanotti

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 29 Jun 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim With counting completed for all but the last 3 runs (SR17 - SR19), the GNO I result is [65.8 +10.2 -9.6 (stat.) +3.4 -3.6 (syst.)]SNU (1sigma) or [65.8 + 10.7 -10.2 (incl. syst.)]SNU (1sigma) with errors combined.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/0006034 (version 1)
Pith ID4JAHRFAU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC.Cattadori, D.Motta, E.Bellotti, E.Burkert, E.Henrich, F.v.Feilitzsch, G.Cerichelli, G.Del Re, G.Heusser, GNO Collaboration: M.Altmann, H.Richter, J.Handt, J.Kiko, J.Lanfranchi, K.H.Ebert, L.Zanotti, M.Balata, M.Chiarini, M.Cribier, M.Laubenstein, M.Wojcik, N.Ferrari, P.Belli, R.Bernabei, S.d'Angelo, S.Waenninger, T.Kirsten, T.Lachenmaier, W.Hampel, W.Rau. "GNO Solar Neutrino Observations: Results for GNOI." arXiv:hep-ex/0006034 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/4JAHRFAU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,554 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.77 · states limitation 0.81 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.30 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We report the first GNO solar neutrino results for the measuring period GNOI, solar exposure time May 20, 1998 till January 12, 2000. In the present analysis, counting results for solar runs SR1 - SR19 were used till April 4, 2000. With counting completed for all but the last 3 runs (SR17 - SR19), the GNO I result is [65.8 +10.2 -9.6 (stat.) +3.4 -3.6 (syst.)]SNU (1sigma) or [65.8 + 10.7 -10.2 (incl. syst.)]SNU (1sigma) with errors combined. This may be compared to the result for Gallex(I-IV), which is [77.5 +7.6 -7.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma). A combined result from both GNOI and Gallex(I-IV) together is [74.1 + 6.7 -6.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We report the first GNO solar neutrino results for the measuring period GNOI, solar exposure time May 20, 1998 till January 12, 2000. contribution 1.00 0.95 0.07 asserted 0.99
s1 In the present analysis, counting results for solar runs SR1 - SR19 were used till April 4, 2000. method 0.95 0.84 0.02 asserted 0.99
s2 With counting completed for all but the last 3 runs (SR17 - SR19), the GNO I result is [65.8 +10.2 -9.6 (stat.) +3.4 -3.6 (syst.)]SNU (1sigma) or [65.8 + 10.7 -10.2 (incl. syst.)]SNU (1sigma) with errors combined. result 1.00 0.96 0.71 asserted 1.00
s3 This may be compared to the result for Gallex(I-IV), which is [77.5 +7.6 -7.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma). background 0.47 0.23 0.09 hedged possibility 0.69
s4 A combined result from both GNOI and Gallex(I-IV) together is [74.1 + 6.7 -6.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma). result 1.00 0.87 0.26 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We report the first GNO solar neutrino results for the measuring period GNOI, solar exposure time May 20, 1998 till January 12, 2000. In the present analysis, counting results for solar runs SR1 - SR19 were used till April 4, 2000. With counting completed for all but the last 3 runs (SR17 - SR19), the GNO I result is [65.8 +10.2 -9.6 (stat.) +3.4 -3.6 (syst.)]SNU (1sigma) or [65.8 + 10.7 -10.2 (incl. syst.)]SNU (1sigma) with errors combined. This may be compared to the result for Gallex(I-IV), which is [77.5 +7.6 -7.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma). A combined result from both GNOI and Gallex(I-IV) together is [74.1 + 6.7 -6.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma).

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

17 arXiv papers cite this in 17 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 2 papers
  • Starting from the observed values for the electron neutrino disappearance probabilities by Borexino [ref] [equation] and adding the spectral information on the $^8B$ neutrinos by SNO [ref] [Additional solar neutrino information from the dedicated pp experiments SAGE, GALEX, and GNO [ref] and $^8$B measurements Super-Kamiokande [ref] will add some additional information, but will not significantly enhance the constraint.], we then compute the $χ^2$ function defined as [equation] where $p$ are all the neutrino components already mentioned, $P_obs^p$ are the observed probabilities with their uncertainties $(σ^p_obs)^2$ in eq.

    Solar Neutrinos and the Strongest Oscillation Constraints on Scalar NSI · Solar data analysis in presence of diagonal scalar NSI parameters · 1.00

  • Recent real-time high-precision solar neutrino data from Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) [ref] and SuperKamiokande (SK) [ref] experiments combined with data from radiochemical Homestake [ref] , SAGE [ref] , Gallex [ref] , and Gallium Neutrino Observatory (GNO) [ref] experiments pinpointed neutrino parameters, especially the value of the mixing angle usually referred to as $θ_⊙$.

    Contrasting solar and reactor neutrinos with a non-zero value of theta13 · Introduction · 0.84

Cites it as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.