Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Neutrino-Nucleus Cross Sections for Oscillation Experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.07770 v1 pith:G2TYK4M6 submitted 2016-11-23 hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th

classification hep-phhep-exnucl-exnucl-th
keywords crossneutrinosectionsexperimentalexperimentsneutrino-nucleuschanneloscillation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Neutrino oscillations physics is entered in the precision era. In this context accelerator-based neutrino experiments need a reduction of systematic errors to the level of a few percent. Today one of the most important sources of systematic errors are neutrino-nucleus cross sections which in the hundreds-MeV to few-GeV energy region are known with a precision not exceeding 20%. In this article we review the present experimental and theoretical knowledge of the neutrino-nucleus interaction physics. After introducing neutrino oscillation physics and accelerator-based neutrino experiments, we overview general aspects of the neutrino-nucleus cross sections, both theoretical and experimental views. Then we focus on these quantities in different reaction channels. We start with the quasielastic and quasielastic-like cross section, putting a special emphasis on multinucleon emission channel which attracted a lot of attention in the last few years. We review the main aspects of the different microscopic models for this channel by discussing analogies and differences among them.The discussion is always driven by a comparison with the experimental data. We then consider the one pion production channel where data-theory agreement remains very unsatisfactory. We describe how to interpret pion data, then we analyze in particular the puzzle related to the impossibility of theoretical models and Monte Carlo to simultaneously describe MiniBooNE and MINERvA experimental results. Inclusive cross sections are also discussed, as well as the comparison between the $\nu_\mu$ and $\nu_e$ cross sections, relevant for the CP violation experiments. The impact of the nuclear effects on the reconstruction of neutrino energy and on the determination of the neutrino oscillation parameters is reviewed. A window to the future is finally opened by discussing projects and efforts in future detectors, beams, and analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Medium Characterization with Hard Probes: From Cherenkov Light in QED to Jet Drift in QCD

    nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The work presents a dispersive fit for the refractive index of liquid argon incorporating anomalous dispersion and proposes jet drift in simulations of heavy-ion collisions as a way to disentangle medium properties fr...

  2. What Cosine Similarity of Label Representations Can and Cannot Tell us

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    For softmax classifiers, cosine similarity of unembeddings is uninformative about model probabilities because it can be reset to ±1 while leaving all probabilities unchanged.

Pith tools