Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Weak form factors for heavy meson decays

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ph/0008261 v1 pith:NQGJQBKP submitted 2000-08-24 hep-ph

Weak form factors for heavy meson decays

classification hep-ph
keywords factorsformquarkmesonsapproachdecaysfunctionsheavy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We calculate the form factors for weak decays of $B_{(s)}$ and $D_{(s)}$ mesons to light pseudoscalar and vector mesons within a relativistic dispersion approach based on the constituent quark picture. This approach gives the form factors as relativistic double spectral representations in terms of the wave functions of the initial and final mesons. The form factors have the correct analytic properties and satisfy general requirements of nonperturbative QCD in the heavy quark limit. The effective quark masses and meson wave functions are determined by fitting the quark model parameters to lattice QCD results for the $B\to \rho$ transition form factors at large momentum transfers and to the measured $D\to (K,K^*)l\nu$ decay rates. This allows us to predict numerous form factors for all kinematically accessible $q^2$ values.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Systematic analysis of $D_{(s)}$ meson semi-leptonic decays in the covariant light-front quark model

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CLFQM calculations of D(s) to P/S/V/A form factors and branching ratios agree with data for most P and V channels but show notable discrepancies for several S and A channels.