Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0304246 v2 · submitted 25 Apr 2003

Resonant decay of flat directions

Marieke Postma, Anupam Mazumdar

The paper says

“The D-term quartic couplings do not generate an effective mass for the tachyonic modes, making it an efficient decay channel.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We study preheating, i.e., non-perturbative resonant decay, of flat direction fields, concentrating on MSSM flat directions and the right handed sneutrino. The difference between inflaton preheating and flaton preheating, is that the potential is more constraint in the latter case. The effects of a complex driving field, quartic couplings in the potential, and the presence of a thermal bath are important and cannot be neglected. Preheating of MSSM flat directions is typically delayed due to out-of-phase oscillations of the real and imaginary components and may be preceded by perturbative decay or Q-ball formation. Particle production due to the violation of adiabaticity is expected to be inefficient due to back reaction effects. For a small initial sneutrino VEV, < N > ≲ mN/h with mN the mass of the right handed sneutrino and h a yakawa coupling, there are tachyonic instabilities. The D-term quartic couplings do not generate an effective mass for the tachyonic modes, making it an efficient decay channel. It is unclear how thermal scattering affects the resonance.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.81 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.70 · compares with prior results 0.53 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We study preheating, i.e., non-perturbative resonant decay, of flat direction fields, concentrating on MSSM flat directions and the right handed sneutrino. contribution 1.00 0.89 0.07 asserted 0.91
The difference between inflaton preheating and flaton preheating, is that the potential is more constraint in the latter case. background 0.96 0.17 0.05 asserted 1.00
The effects of a complex driving field, quartic couplings in the potential, and the presence of a thermal bath are important and cannot be neglected. result 0.50 0.31 0.09 asserted 1.00
Preheating of MSSM flat directions is typically delayed due to out-of-phase oscillations of the real and imaginary components and may be preceded by perturbative decay or $Q$-ball formation. result 0.96 0.36 0.13 hedged possibility 0.83
Particle production due to the violation of adiabaticity is expected to be inefficient due to back reaction effects. result 0.92 0.30 0.07 hedged possibility 0.85
For a small initial sneutrino VEV, $<N > \lesssim m_N/h$ with $m_N$ the mass of the right handed sneutrino and $h$ a yakawa coupling, there are tachyonic instabilities. result 0.97 0.49 0.09 asserted 0.93
The $D$-term quartic couplings do not generate an effective mass for the tachyonic modes, making it an efficient decay channel. result 0.94 0.58 0.22 asserted 1.00
It is unclear how thermal scattering affects the resonance. limitation 0.54 0.12 0.03 unclear 0.82

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.84 · evidence from argument 0.44

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,274 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 3 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • The most important outcome is that the non adiabaticity in the evolution of the eigenmasses and the eigenvectors is not suppressed in the limit of $ϵ→0$, as was the case for the toy models considered in [ref] .

    The nonperturbative decay of SUSY flat directions · Discussion and Conclusions · contest 0.82

Cites it as background 2 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment