Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0311022 v2 · submitted 3 Nov 2003

Thermal leptogenesis in a model with mass varying neutrinos

Xiao-Jun Bi, Peihong Gu, Xiulian Wang, Xinmin Zhang

The paper says

“Our results show that it is possible to lower the reheating temperature in this scenario in comparison with the case that the neutrino masses are unchanged, which helps solve the gravitino problem.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

In this paper we consider the possibility of neutrino mass varying during the evolution of the Universe and study its implications on leptogenesis. Specifically, we take the minimal seesaw model of neutrino masses and introduce a coupling between the right-handed neutrinos and the dark energy scalar field, the Quintessence. In our model, the right-handed neutrino masses change as the Quintessence scalar evolves. We then examine in detail the parameter space of this model allowed by the observed baryon number asymmetry. Our results show that it is possible to lower the reheating temperature in this scenario in comparison with the case that the neutrino masses are unchanged, which helps solve the gravitino problem. Furthermore, a degenerate neutrino mass patten with mi larger than the upper limit given in the minimal leptogenesis scenario is permitted.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.75

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.66 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.16 · compares with prior results 0.88 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
In this paper we consider the possibility of neutrino mass varying during the evolution of the Universe and study its implications on leptogenesis. contribution 0.93 0.67 0.04 hedged possibility 0.78
Specifically, we take the minimal seesaw model of neutrino masses and introduce a coupling between the right-handed neutrinos and the dark energy scalar field, the Quintessence. method 0.75 0.84 0.03 asserted 0.98
In our model, the right-handed neutrino masses change as the Quintessence scalar evolves. method 0.76 0.49 0.05 asserted 1.00
We then examine in detail the parameter space of this model allowed by the observed baryon number asymmetry. method 0.68 0.92 0.05 asserted 0.60
Our results show that it is possible to lower the reheating temperature in this scenario in comparison with the case that the neutrino masses are unchanged, which helps solve the gravitino problem. result 0.85 0.94 0.50 asserted 0.75
Furthermore, a degenerate neutrino mass patten with $m_i$ larger than the upper limit given in the minimal leptogenesis scenario is permitted. result 1.00 0.90 0.19 asserted 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.74

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,931 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 6 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 17 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 10 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment