Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Hard probes in heavy ion collisions at the LHC: heavy flavour physics

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 4 Nov 2003

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This report gives benchmark heavy quark and quarkonium cross sections for $pp$ and $pA$ collisions at the LHC against which the $AA$ rates can be compared in the study of the quark-gluon plasma.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0311048 (version 1)
Pith IDH4OSGTCO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Dainese, A. Deandrea, A.D. Polosa, B. Cole, D. Blaschke, D. Kharzeev, E. Vercellin, G. Nardulli, G.T. Bodwin, H. Niemi, H. Satz, H. Takai, I.P. Lokhtin, Jungil Lee, M. Bedjidian, M. Mangano, M. Nardi, N. Carrer, N. Marchal, O.L. Kodolova, P. Crochet, P. Hoyer, P. Petreczky, R. Kvatadze, R.L. Thews, R. Vogt, S. Frixione, S. Peigne', S. Tapprogge. "Hard probes in heavy ion collisions at the LHC: heavy flavour physics." arXiv:hep-ph/0311048 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/H4OSGTCO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,531 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.31 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.65 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.44 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present the results from the heavy quarks and quarkonia working group. This report gives benchmark heavy quark and quarkonium cross sections for $pp$ and $pA$ collisions at the LHC against which the $AA$ rates can be compared in the study of the quark-gluon plasma. We also provide an assessment of the theoretical uncertainties in these benchmarks. We then discuss some of the cold matter effects on quarkonia production, including nuclear absorption, scattering by produced hadrons, and energy loss in the medium. Hot matter effects that could reduce the observed quarkonium rates such as color screening and thermal activation are then discussed. Possible quarkonium enhancement through coalescence of uncorrelated heavy quarks and antiquarks is also described. Finally, we discuss the capabilities of the LHC detectors to measure heavy quarks and quarkonia as well as the Monte Carlo generators used in the data analysis.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present the results from the heavy quarks and quarkonia working group. contribution 0.98 0.64 0.03 asserted 0.83
s1 This report gives benchmark heavy quark and quarkonium cross sections for $pp$ and $pA$ collisions at the LHC against which the $AA$ rates can be compared in the study of the quark-gluon plasma. contribution 0.97 0.80 0.18 asserted 0.99
s2 We also provide an assessment of the theoretical uncertainties in these benchmarks. contribution 0.94 0.87 0.04 asserted 0.95
s3 We then discuss some of the cold matter effects on quarkonia production, including nuclear absorption, scattering by produced hadrons, and energy loss in the medium. contribution 0.67 0.22 0.03 asserted 0.84
s4 Hot matter effects that could reduce the observed quarkonium rates such as color screening and thermal activation are then discussed. contribution 0.59 0.14 0.03 hedged possibility 1.00
s5 Possible quarkonium enhancement through coalescence of uncorrelated heavy quarks and antiquarks is also described. contribution 0.53 0.20 0.03 hedged possibility 0.98
s6 Finally, we discuss the capabilities of the LHC detectors to measure heavy quarks and quarkonia as well as the Monte Carlo generators used in the data analysis. method 0.92 0.40 0.03 asserted 0.87

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: dataset or benchmark 0.92 · evidence from literature 0.50.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present the results from the heavy quarks and quarkonia working group. This report gives benchmark heavy quark and quarkonium cross sections for $pp$ and $pA$ collisions at the LHC against which the $AA$ rates can be compared in the study of the quark-gluon plasma. We also provide an assessment of the theoretical uncertainties in these benchmarks. We then discuss some of the cold matter effects on quarkonia production, including nuclear absorption, scattering by produced hadrons, and energy loss in the medium. Hot matter effects that could reduce the observed quarkonium rates such as color screening and thermal activation are then discussed. Possible quarkonium enhancement through coalescence of uncorrelated heavy quarks and antiquarks is also described. Finally, we discuss the capabilities of the LHC detectors to measure heavy quarks and quarkonia as well as the Monte Carlo generators used in the data analysis.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

33 arXiv papers cite this in 61 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 36 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • Our calculations use the NLO $Q Q$ code of Mangano et al. [ref] with the $2m_H$ mass cut in Eq. ([ref]) and use the same parameters as in Refs. [ref] with the MRST parton densities [ref] , optimized to obtain agreement with the $Q Q$ cross section, as described in Ref. [ref] .

    Cold Nuclear Matter Effects on J/psi and Upsilon Production at the LHC · Baseline Total Cross Sections · 1.00

Uses its data or values 3 papers
Compares with it 6 papers
  • At larger energies, these results at 7 TeV (100 to 800 nb) and at 14 TeV (200 to 1400 nb) are in the same range as those of the Colour Evaporation Model [ref] with central (upper) values of 140 nb (400 nb) at 7 TeV and 200 nb (550 nb) at 14 TeV.

    Total J/Psi and Upsilon production cross section at the LHC: theory vs. experiment · Total $J/ψ$ and $Υ$ cross section at the LHC[Note that we have not depicted the systematic uncertainties attached the un · 0.96

  • At larger energies, these results at 7 TeV (100 to 800 nb) and at 14 TeV (200 to 1400 nb) are in the same range as those of the Colour Evaporation Model [ref] with central (upper) values of 140 nb (400 nb) at 7 TeV and 200 nb (550 nb) at 14 TeV.

    Total J/psi production cross section at the LHC · Total $J/ψ$ cross section at the LHC · 0.99

  • Reasonable agreement between this result and the Fixed-Order Next-To-Leading Logarithm and Color-Evaporation-Model (FONLL+CEM) [ref] calculations has been achieved.

    Energy dependent forward B $\rightarrow$ $J/\psi$ measurements in p+p collisions at PHENIX · The fraction of $J/ψ$ from $B$ meson decay in $√(s)$ = 510 and 200 GeV $p$+$p$ collisions · 1.00

Cites it as background 10 papers
  • In an event generator like PYTHIA or HERWIG, heavy flavor production is divided into three different categories: flavor or pair creation, flavor excitation, and gluon splitting [ref] .

    Heavy Flavor Azimuthal Correlations in Cold Nuclear Matter · Heavy flavor production in leading order event generators compared to NLO calculations · 0.92

  • In this review of predictions for the heavy-ion programme at the LHC[Similar efforts done for RHIC can found in [ref] .] I will classify them into different groups according to the following scheme: Those observables which characterize the produced medium itself, which I will call bulk observables (or soft probes, as they refer to particles with momentum scales of the order of the typical momentum scale of the medium - the temperature if thermalization were achieved); and those whose expectation in the absence of any medium can be calculated by perturbative methods in QCD (pQCD) (thus characterized by a momentum scale much larger than both $Λ_QCD$ and the 'temperature' of the medium), commonly referred to as hard probes [ref] .

    Predictions for the heavy-ion programme at the Large Hadron Collider · Introduction · 0.80

  • Heavy-quarkonium production mechanism has always been – and still is – a subject of debate (for reviews see [ref] ).

    Perspectives on heavy-quarkonium production at the LHC · Introduction · 0.99

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.