Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0402003 v1 · submitted 31 Jan 2004

Precision Calculations for Associated WH and ZH Production at Hadron Colliders

O.Brein, M.Ciccolini, S.Dittmaier, A.Djouadi, R.Harlander, M.Krämer

The paper says

“In this article the various corrections are briefly discussed and combined into state-of-the-art predictions for the cross sections.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

Recently the next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections and the electroweak O(alpha) corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes ppbar/pp -> WH/ZH + X have been calculated. Both types of corrections are of the order of 5-10%. In this article the various corrections are briefly discussed and combined into state-of-the-art predictions for the cross sections. The theoretical uncertainties from renormalization/factorization scales and from the parton distribution functions are discussed.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.98

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.34 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.87 · compares with prior results 0.32 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
Recently the next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections and the electroweak O(alpha) corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes ppbar/pp -> WH/ZH + X have been calculated. background 0.99 0.06 0.09 asserted 1.00
Both types of corrections are of the order of 5-10%. result 0.88 0.16 0.19 asserted 1.00
In this article the various corrections are briefly discussed and combined into state-of-the-art predictions for the cross sections. contribution 0.99 0.87 0.38 asserted 0.98
The theoretical uncertainties from renormalization/factorization scales and from the parton distribution functions are discussed. contribution 0.71 0.68 0.05 asserted 0.83

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.64 · evidence from literature 0.46

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,547 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 9 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

8 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Uses its data or values 2 papers
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 1 paper

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment