High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0402295 v5 · submitted 27 Feb 2004
Les Houches "Physics at TeV Colliders 2003" Beyond the Standard Model Working Group: Summary Report
The paper says
“The work contained herein constitutes a report of the “Beyond the Standard Model” working group for the Workshop "Physics at TeV Colliders", Les Houches, France, 26 May–6 June, 2003.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
The work contained herein constitutes a report of the “Beyond the Standard Model” working group for the Workshop "Physics at TeV Colliders", Les Houches, France, 26 May–6 June, 2003. The research presented is original, and was performed specifically for the workshop. Tools for calculations in the minimal supersymmetric standard model are presented, including a comparison of the dark matter relic density predicted by public codes. Reconstruction of supersymmetric particle masses at the LHC and a future linear collider facility is examined. Less orthodox supersymmetric signals such as non-pointing photons and R-parity violating signals are studied. Features of extra dimensional models are examined next, including measurement strategies for radions and Higgs', as well as the virtual effects of Kaluza Klein modes of gluons. An LHC search strategy for a heavy top found in many little Higgs model is presented and finally, there is an update on LHC Z′ studies.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.99
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.73 · mentions code or data availability 0.06
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v5). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The work contained herein constitutes a report of the ``Beyond the Standard Model'' working group for the Workshop "Physics at TeV Colliders", Les Houches, France, 26 May--6 June, 2003. | background 0.80 | 0.34 | 0.02 | asserted 0.99 |
| The research presented is original, and was performed specifically for the workshop. | contribution 0.77 | 0.63 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| Tools for calculations in the minimal supersymmetric standard model are presented, including a comparison of the dark matter relic density predicted by public codes. | contribution 0.94 | 0.71 | 0.06 | asserted 0.99 |
| Reconstruction of supersymmetric particle masses at the LHC and a future linear collider facility is examined. | contribution 0.99 | 0.56 | 0.04 | asserted 0.94 |
| Less orthodox supersymmetric signals such as non-pointing photons and R-parity violating signals are studied. | contribution 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
| Features of extra dimensional models are examined next, including measurement strategies for radions and Higgs', as well as the virtual effects of Kaluza Klein modes of gluons. | contribution 0.99 | 0.42 | 0.04 | asserted 0.95 |
| An LHC search strategy for a heavy top found in many little Higgs model is presented and finally, there is an update on LHC $Z'$ studies. | contribution 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.06 | asserted 0.97 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.79 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.79
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v5
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,597 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
Cited by 12 Pith papers
Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record
- Neural Control Variates at LO and NLO hep-ph · Jul 2026
- Mass Determination in SUSY-like Events with Missing Energy hep-ph · Jun 2007
- Top Spin and CP from Equivariant Transformers hep-ph · Nov 2026
- Narrow-width approximation accuracy hep-ph · Jul 2008
- Accurate Mass Determinations in Decay Chains with Missing Energy hep-ph · Feb 2008
- A New SUSY mass reconstruction method at the CERN LHC hep-ph · Oct 2004
- Les Houches "Physics at TeV Colliders 2005'' Beyond the Standard Model working group: summary report hep-ph · Feb 2006
- Dark Matter Dynamics and Indirect Detection astro-ph · Apr 2005
- Physics Interplay of the LHC and the ILC hep-ph · Oct 2004
- Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints hep-ph · Apr 2004
- NuSTEC Review: Current Experimental and Theoretical Challenges of Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering hep-ex · Nov 2026
- A Review of the Mass Measurement Techniques proposed for the Large Hadron Collider hep-ph · Apr 2010
How the literature uses it
6 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences
Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
In recent years there have been numerous studies of how to measure the super-partner masses just based on kinematic information [ref] .
Mass Determination in SUSY-like Events with Missing Energy · Introduction · 0.97
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment