Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0403085 v1 · submitted 8 Mar 2004

The Gold-plated mode revisited: sin(2 beta) and B^0 to J/Psi K_S in the Standard Model

Heike Boos, Thomas Mannel, Jurgen Reuter

The paper says

“This means in turn that any deviation visible at the B factories will be a clear signal for new physics.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We study the corrections to the determination of sin(2 beta) from the time dependent CP asymmetry of B^0 to J/Psi K_S which arise in the standard model. Although a precise prediction of these corrections is not possible we find that they are indeed extremely small, of the order of less than a per mil of the observed value. This means in turn that any deviation visible at the B factories will be a clear signal for new physics.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.95

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.91 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.94 · compares with prior results 0.17 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We study the corrections to the determination of sin(2 beta) from the time dependent CP asymmetry of B^0 to J/Psi K_S which arise in the standard model. contribution 1.00 0.82 0.05 asserted 0.81
Although a precise prediction of these corrections is not possible we find that they are indeed extremely small, of the order of less than a per mil of the observed value. result 1.00 0.93 0.53 asserted 0.99
This means in turn that any deviation visible at the B factories will be a clear signal for new physics. interpretation 1.00 0.43 0.55 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.72

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,950 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 10 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

14 arXiv papers cite this in 19 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 2 papers
Uses its data or values 1 paper
  • HFLAV [ref] gives for the experimental values [equation] We introduce BSM effects to Eq. ([ref]) by adding to the SM expression in Eq. ([ref]) the double insertion of the effective Hamiltonian [equation] Following [ref] we evaluate the full combination at the scale $μ_c=m_c$, where the extra contribution to the SM $|ΔB|=2$ Hamiltonian in Eq. ([ref]) is given by [equation] with [equation]

    Model-independent bounds on new physics effects in non-leptonic tree-level decays of B-mesons · $sin(2β_d)$ and SM update of $ΔM_q$ · 0.91

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • The neglected amplitude is both CKM and $α_s(m_b)$ suppressed with respect to the dominant amplitude, so the corrections to this equation are below the percent (or even the per mil) level [ref] .

    Topics in Hadronic B Decays · The $B_d,s-B̅_d,s$ mixing angles and the $ΔM_d,s$ mass differences · 0.97

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment