Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A critique of the angular momentum sum rules and a new angular momentum sum rule

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ph/0406139 v2 pith:5QCDDJZD submitted 2004-06-11 hep-ph hep-thnucl-th

classification hep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords angularmomentumresultsrulestatecanonicalelementshelicity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a study of the tensorial structure of the hadronic matrix elements of the angular momentum operators $\bm{J}$. Well known results in the literature are shown to be incorrect, and we have taken pains to derive the correct expressions in three different ways, two involving explicit physical wave packets and the third, totally independent, based upon the rotational properties of the state vectors. Surprisingly it turns out that the results are very sensitive to the type of relativistic spin state used to describe the motion of the particle i.e. whether a canonical (i.e. boost) state or a helicity state is utilized. We present results for the matrix elements of the angular momentum operators, valid in an arbitrary Lorentz frame, both for helicity states and canonical states. These results are relevant for the construction of angular momentum sum rules, relating the angular momentum of a nucleon to the spin and orbital angular momentum of its constituents. It turns out that it is necessary to distinguish carefully whether the motion of the partons is characterized via canonical or helicity spin states. Fortunately, for the simple parton model interpretation, when the proton moves along $OZ$, our results for the sum rule based upon the matrix elements of $J_z$ agree with the often used sum rule found in the literature. But for the components $J_x, J_y$ the results are different and lead to a new and very intuitive sum rule for transverse polarization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transverse energy-momentum tensor distributions in polarized nucleons

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Transverse EMT distributions in polarized nucleons are derived in the quantum phase-space formalism; they reduce to standard light-front densities (including bad components) in the infinite-momentum frame.

  2. Mapping the transverse spin sum rule in position space

    hep-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Derives relativistic spatial distributions of transverse orbital angular momentum, intrinsic spin, and total angular momentum in the transverse plane for spin-0 and spin-1/2 targets via quantum phase-space formalism a...

  3. Relativistic energy-momentum tensor distributions in a polarized nucleon

    hep-ph 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Relativistic EMT distributions in polarized nucleons recover good and bad light-front components in the IMF after including polarization effects.

  4. Gluon contribution to the angular momentum distribution of a dressed quark state

    hep-ph 2024-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gluon angular momentum densities in a dressed quark model are computed for canonical, kinetic, and Belinfante decompositions, and the spin sum rule is verified.

Pith tools