Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0409224 v1 · submitted 19 Sep 2004

Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillation

Srubabati Goswami, Abhijit Bandyopadhyay, Sandhya Choubey

The paper says

“We present the constraints on neutrino oscillation parameters Δm2⊙ and θ⊙ governing the solar neutrino oscillations from two generation analysis of solar and KamLAND data.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We present the constraints on neutrino oscillation parameters Δm2⊙ and θ⊙ governing the solar neutrino oscillations from two generation analysis of solar and KamLAND data. We include the latest 766.3 ton year KamLAND data in our analysis. We also present the allowed values of parameters Δm2atm and sin2θatm from two generation oscillation analysis of SuperKamiokande atmospheric and K2K data. For both cases we discuss the precision achieved in the present set of experiments and also how the precision can be improved in future. We also obtain the bounds on θ13 from three generation analysis of global oscillation data. We emphasise on the roles played by different data sets in constraining the allowed parameter ranges.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.44 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We present the constraints on neutrino oscillation parameters $\Delta m^2_{\odot}$ and $\theta_{\odot}$ governing the solar neutrino oscillations from two generation analysis of solar and KamLAND data. contribution 0.79 0.92 0.26 asserted 1.00
We include the latest 766.3 ton year KamLAND data in our analysis. method 0.93 0.75 0.03 asserted 0.98
We also present the allowed values of parameters $\Delta m^2_{atm}$ and $\sin^2\theta_{atm}$ from two generation oscillation analysis of SuperKamiokande atmospheric and K2K data. contribution 0.52 0.90 0.09 asserted 1.00
For both cases we discuss the precision achieved in the present set of experiments and also how the precision can be improved in future. future work 0.53 0.67 0.11 asserted 0.91
We also obtain the bounds on $\theta_{13}$ from three generation analysis of global oscillation data. result 0.85 0.94 0.12 asserted 1.00
We emphasise on the roles played by different data sets in constraining the allowed parameter ranges. interpretation 0.81 0.56 0.10 asserted 0.88

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.81 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,926 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 3 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses its data or values 3 papers
  • The atmospheric neutrino data restrict the deviation of $θ_23$ from maximality to be $<0.15$ rad [ref] , and the CHOOZ data [ref] combined with solar, atmospheric and KamLAND experiments constrain $θ_13$ to be less than 0.2 rad [ref] .

    Signatures of heavy sterile neutrinos at long baseline experiments · Analytic computation of neutrino flavor conversion probabilities · 0.90

  • The mass-squared difference and the mixing angle are determined to be [ref] : [equation] where we have shown the errors bars in the 1$σ$ (3$σ$) range.

    Results from MiniBooNE · The Standard Picture of three neutrino oscillations · 0.85

  • This corresponds to $n=-3$ and $k=C·10^31$ in Eq. ([ref]), then we have [equation] For very small $θ_13$, $P_H$ has a simpler expression: [equation] Since $θ_13$ is small, we need only to consider the $m=0$ term in Eq. ([ref]), then [equation] In addition, since $Δm^2_21≪|Δm^2_31|$, we can set [equation] Then we obtain [equation] In the $2σ$ allowed ranges [ref] [ref] [ref] [ref] [equation] and we will use $2.6×10^-3eV^2$ for $|Δm^2_32|$ in the following calculation.

    Realistic Earth matter effects and a method to acquire information about small \theta_{13} in the detection of supernova neutrinos · A possible method to acquire information about $θ_13$ smaller than $1.5^∘$ · 0.96

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment