High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0410063 v1 · submitted 5 Oct 2004
Measuring the MSSM Lagrangean
The paper says
“We make the case that a proper treatment of the error propagation is crucial for any analysis of this kind.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
At the LHC, it will be possible to investigate scenarios for physics beyond the Standard Model in detail. We present precise total and differential cross section predictions, based on Prospino2.0 and SMadGraph. We also show to what degree the structure of the weak–scale supersymmetric Lagrangean can be studied, based on LHC data alone or based on combined LHC and linear collider. Using Sfitter we correctly take into account experimental and theoretical errors. We make the case that a proper treatment of the error propagation is crucial for any analysis of this kind.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.39 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.15 · mentions code or data availability 0.04
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At the LHC, it will be possible to investigate scenarios for physics beyond the Standard Model in detail. | background 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.04 | hedged possibility 0.99 |
| We present precise total and differential cross section predictions, based on Prospino2.0 and SMadGraph. | contribution 0.49 | 0.89 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| We also show to what degree the structure of the weak--scale supersymmetric Lagrangean can be studied, based on LHC data alone or based on combined LHC and linear collider. | contribution 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.32 | asserted 0.95 |
| Using Sfitter we correctly take into account experimental and theoretical errors. | method 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.08 | asserted 1.00 |
| We make the case that a proper treatment of the error propagation is crucial for any analysis of this kind. | interpretation 0.93 | 0.39 | 0.38 | asserted 1.00 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.81 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.98
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v1
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,162 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
Cited by 4 Pith papers
Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record
- Neural Control Variates at LO and NLO hep-ph · Jul 2026
- Top Spin and CP from Equivariant Transformers hep-ph · Nov 2026
- CheckMATE 2: From the model to the limit hep-ph · Nov 2016
- Fittino, a program for determining MSSM parameters from collider observables using an iterative method hep-ph · Dec 2004
How the literature uses it
8 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences
Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 4 papers
-
The values are obtained using the PROSPINO [ref] v2.1 program.
Constraint from recent ATLAS results on non-universal sfermion mass models and naturalness · Viable parameter space, cross sections and branching ratios · 1.00
-
Next, the NLO cross sections for the $∼85$ SUSY production processes we considered were computed using a modified version of PROSPINOv.2.1 [ref] that avoided potentially negative K-factors due to sign issues associated with the neutralino masses.
Supersymmetry Without Prejudice at the LHC · Generation of the Signal Events · 0.98
-
In addition, Prospino2.0 [ref] is used to take into account the next-to-leading order (NLO) cross-sections for the gluino pair production.
Prospects of Gluino searches in multi-lepton channels in the light of ongoing LHC RUN-III · The Simulation · 0.98
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
Current codes that can evaluate a broad collection of MSSM cross-sections at NLO include [ref] and [ref] .
$\textsf{Xsec}$: the cross-section evaluation code · Introduction · 0.86
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment